Menu

Global Policy

ASIC opens consultation on crypto exchange rules ahead of 2027 licensing deadline

ASIC opens consultation on crypto exchange rules ahead of 2027 licensing deadline

, , , , , , ,

Australia’s financial regulator has opened a consultation on strict new rules for crypto exchanges and digital asset platforms, marking the country’s shift toward treating cryptocurrency businesses like traditional financial firms. The rules take effect April 8, 2027, with a licensing deadline of October 7, 2027 for existing operators.

  • ASIC opened consultation on Thursday on proposed standards requiring crypto exchanges to safeguard customer funds, ensure trading transparency and meet financial requirements.
  • Existing crypto firms have until October 7, 2027 to apply for a license and can continue operating while regulators review their applications.
  • The consultation closes November 27, with final guidance expected in March 2027, as Australia aligns with EU, Singapore and Hong Kong regulatory approaches.
  • April 8, 2027 Effective date when new digital asset framework laws take effect in Australia
  • 140+ Digital asset business applications ASIC has recorded seeking authorization to provide services
  • Nov 27 Deadline for stakeholder submissions on proposed standards and guidance
  • Oct 7, 2027 Final licensing application deadline for existing crypto operators

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) on Thursday commenced consultation on guidance and standards to implement the country’s new digital asset framework, setting mandatory requirements for how cryptocurrency exchanges and tokenised custody platforms must operate. CoinDesk reported the regulator’s proposals cover asset safeguarding, trading procedures and financial resource requirements ahead of the April 8, 2027 effective date. Parliament passed the underlying legislation in April 2026, joining the European Union, Singapore and Hong Kong in establishing dedicated crypto regulatory frameworks.

ASIC proposes standards covering asset separation, trading transparency and financial resources

Consultation Paper 392 outlines how digital asset platforms must apply for or update their regulatory license, provide customer disclosure documents and comply with asset-holding standards. The proposals require platforms to segregate and safeguard customer assets, implement transparent settlement procedures and maintain adequate financial resources. Trading rules address market manipulation, conflicts of interest and how exchanges handle customer orders.

ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland said the regulator’s approach recognizes the rapid evolution of global markets. “Our approach is based on the principle of ‘same activity, same risk, same regulatory outcome’ to align Australia with the approach of comparable overseas jurisdictions,” Kirkland stated in the consultation announcement.

Bringing digital asset platforms and tokenised custody platforms into the financial services regulatory framework means consumers can have greater confidence when trading digital assets.

Alan Kirkland, ASIC Commissioner

Over 140 firms seek authorization as ASIC extends transition period

ASIC has recorded more than 140 applications from businesses seeking to provide digital asset-related financial services, including over 110 applications received during the sector-wide no-action period that ran from October 2025 to September 30, 2026. The regulator extended that transition deadline in June 2026 as a pragmatic response to industry transition challenges. Existing crypto operators can now continue business while ASIC reviews their license applications, provided they submit by October 7, 2027.

Stablecoins used for payments are being addressed separately through Australia’s payment services reforms, according to the regulator’s announcement.

Consultation closes in six weeks; final rules come in March 2027

The consultation period closes November 27, 2026, at 5pm AEDT.

ASIC engaged early with industry through its Digital Asset Advisory Group and fintech liaison meetings in developing the proposals and will continue direct stakeholder engagement through consultation events and roundtables. The regulator published a consultation user guide to help stakeholders navigate the full package and provide feedback, with submissions sent to fintech@asic.gov.au. Final guidance and standards are expected in March 2027, giving platforms three weeks to prepare before the April 8 effective date.

The rules follow the 2022 FTX collapse, which left approximately 30,000 Australian customers unable to access their funds, and underscore the regulatory response to industry failures affecting domestic investors.

The BlockWest read. These rules reshape how Australian crypto operators manage capital and conduct business, but the six-month window between final guidance and the April 2027 effective date compresses significantly for the 140-plus firms waiting on approval. Exchanges must now embed compliance costs before rules take effect, while ASIC’s capacity to process 140-plus applications by October 2027 remains untested.

Stakeholders have until November 27, 2026 to submit feedback on the consultation paper. The critical test comes in March 2027 when ASIC publishes final guidance; any material changes to the proposed standards could force platforms to redesign systems with less than six weeks’ notice before the April 8 effective date.

Dutch central bank grants Qivalis e-money license for euro token

Dutch central bank grants Qivalis e-money license for euro token

, , , , ,

Europe’s largest banking consortium has cleared a crucial regulatory hurdle to launch a blockchain-native euro token under strict EU rules that prohibit interest payments and require redemption at face value. This moves a systemic financial settlement tool closer to production, testing whether traditional finance will adopt tokenized currency at scale.

  • The Bank of the Netherlands approved Qivalis, a 37-bank consortium, as an electronic money institution under MiCA regulations.
  • Qivalis must publish a white paper and meet remaining EU requirements before issuing its euro-denominated electronic money token in coming months.
  • The token will distribute through banks, exchanges and payment providers rather than to retail customers, targeting institutional settlement flows.
  • 37 Major European banks backing Qivalis since its founding in September 2025
  • €1 Value peg for Qivalis tokens under MiCA requirements, no interest allowed

CoinDesk reported that the Bank of the Netherlands (DNB) granted Qivalis an electronic money institution license, moving the Amsterdam-based consortium toward issuing euro-denominated electronic money tokens, a regulated class of stablecoin. Qivalis, founded in September 2025 and now backed by 37 major European banks including BBVA, BNP Paribas, ING and DZ Bank, must still meet remaining European Union requirements under the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation before launch. The consortium plans to distribute its token through banks, cryptocurrency exchanges and payment providers rather than directly to consumers, positioning it as a settlement tool for institutional use.

Dutch approval clears the path for a regulated euro token under MiCA

The electronic money institution license from the DNB represents the final major regulatory gate before Qivalis can issue its token. Under MiCA, electronic money tokens must be pegged to a single official currency, such as the euro, and holders retain a legal claim against the issuer with the right to redeem tokens at face value at any time. The regulation prohibits EMTs from paying interest, distinguishing them from other stablecoins that may link to multiple currencies or assets.

Qivalis CEO Jan-Oliver Sell stated in a company communication that “Europe’s currency deserves Europe’s rules, onchain,” adding: “We believe Europe should have a euro-denominated onchain settlement asset issued under European law and subject to European regulatory standards.”

Europe’s currency deserves Europe’s rules, onchain. We believe Europe should have a euro-denominated onchain settlement asset issued under European law and subject to European regulatory standards.

Jan-Oliver Sell, Qivalis CEO

Remaining EU compliance steps before the token reaches market

Although Qivalis holds its electronic money institution license, the consortium must publish a white paper and satisfy all remaining MiCA requirements before launching its token. The timeline remains unspecified beyond “coming months,” and Qivalis has not disclosed which consortium members will actually use the token or what transaction volumes it expects to move through electronic money tokens.

The consortium selected Fireblocks to provide digital asset infrastructure, giving it institutional-grade custody and settlement capabilities. Dollar-backed stablecoins such as USDC can also qualify as EMTs under MiCA if they meet EU requirements, but issuers that do not meet applicable rules cannot lawfully offer their tokens to the public in the EU.

A test of institutional blockchain adoption at scale

The Qivalis token will function as a blockchain-native settlement asset for banks and payment providers, bypassing retail channels entirely.

This structure differs from consumer-facing stablecoin models and focuses on whether 37 of Europe’s largest financial institutions will actually route material volumes of euros through a tokenized form. The scale of the consortium gives Qivalis access to an extensive banking network, but the actual usage by member banks remains unknown.

The BlockWest read. We see institutional adoption as the test Qivalis must pass. A license proves regulatory compliance; usage proves market need. The consortium’s size is irrelevant if member banks decline to migrate settlement flows onchain. Watch whether the white paper and launch disclosures name which major banks will route euros through the token and in what volumes.

Qivalis has committed to publishing its white paper and launching the token in the coming months. The real measure of success will be the announcement of which consortium members begin using it for settlement and the first reported transaction flows across the network.

France approves 31.4% tax on regulated stablecoin conversions from January 2027

France approves 31.4% tax on regulated stablecoin conversions from January 2027

, , , , , ,

France’s lawmakers are advancing a tax framework that would treat conversions to regulated stablecoins as taxable events, potentially reshaping crypto trading behavior across the EU. The proposal highlights an emerging tension between regulatory compliance and tax avoidance, as policymakers attempt to widen their tax base while inadvertently creating incentives to use less transparent alternatives.

  • France’s finance committee approved an amendment on October 7 taxing swaps from cryptocurrencies into EU-regulated stablecoins at 31.4% beginning January 1, 2027.
  • A second amendment approved October 9 would require disclosure of self-hosted wallets holding €100,000 or more, with fines up to $11,600 for non-compliance.
  • The full National Assembly must resubmit and vote on these measures by October 20, as the finance committee rejected the revenue section of the 2027 budget 31 votes to 3.
  • 31.4% France’s capital gains tax rate on crypto transactions
  • €100,000 Minimum wallet size requiring disclosure to French tax authorities
  • 33 Physical attacks on crypto holders in France through July 2026
  • 10% Capital gains tax Greece is preparing to impose on crypto

France’s National Assembly is advancing a series of cryptocurrency tax measures as part of the country’s 2027 budget deliberations, according to reporting by CoinDesk. The most significant proposal would classify conversions from cryptocurrencies into stablecoins regulated under the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework as taxable events, subjecting them to France’s standard 31.4% capital gains rate starting January 1, 2027. Currently, swapping one cryptocurrency for another does not trigger capital gains tax in France, and the measure would specifically target so-called electronic money tokens that fall under MiCA’s scope following the regulation’s full implementation on July 1.

Regulated stablecoins face targeted tax treatment starting 2027

The amendment, adopted by the National Assembly’s finance committee on October 7, creates a narrow but significant distinction in how France treats digital asset conversions. By taxing only swaps into EU-regulated stablecoins and not other cryptocurrency-to-cryptocurrency trades, the framework effectively penalizes the use of compliant financial instruments while leaving unregulated alternatives untaxed.

Francois Volpoet, Chainalysis’ CEO for France, cautioned that the approach risks undermining regulatory objectives. “Do we want more taxpayers to declare their assets, or a higher tax rate applied to a base that is increasingly evaded?” he said in comments to CoinDesk. Volpoet noted that authorities can more readily track regulated stablecoin transactions than trades conducted through decentralized finance platforms or self-hosted wallets, suggesting that the tax structure may inadvertently incentivize traders to migrate toward less transparent channels.

Disclosure requirements and physical security concerns

A second amendment approved on October 9 mandates that French taxpayers disclose self-hosted cryptocurrency wallets holding at least €100,000 in assets, with penalties of up to $11,600 for violations.

Volpoet raised security objections to the disclosure mandate, pointing to a sharp rise in physical attacks targeting cryptocurrency holders in France. Through July 2026, Europe experienced 39 of 52 recorded global incidents of this type, with France alone accounting for 33 attacks or 63.5% of the worldwide total. The concentration of attacks in France underscores potential risks associated with mandated asset disclosure, as public records of large holdings could make individuals targets for theft or coercion.

The legislative package also includes an amendment adopted October 7 that would allow investors to carry forward cryptocurrency losses for up to 10 years, aligning the tax treatment of digital assets more closely with equities. A separate measure would extend France’s exit tax, which applies to wealthy individuals relocating abroad, to cryptocurrency holdings worth approximately $900,000.

Budget deadlock forces resubmission to full assembly

The finance committee rejected the revenue section of the government’s 2027 budget by a vote of 31 to 3, requiring all crypto-related amendments to be resubmitted to the full National Assembly for debate.

Lawmakers are scheduled to vote on the revenue section on October 20 (Tuesday). None of the proposed measures have become law. The outcome remains uncertain, as the broad rejection of the budget’s revenue framework suggests deeper fiscal disagreements that could reshape or eliminate individual provisions during full assembly proceedings.

France’s push for expanded crypto taxation contrasts sharply with regulatory approaches elsewhere in the EU. Greece is preparing to impose a 10% capital gains tax on cryptocurrency, making it among the bloc’s lowest-taxed jurisdictions on digital assets. Germany, Italy, and France are all setting or planning capital gains rates exceeding 25%, fragmenting the EU’s tax treatment of crypto across member states.

The BlockWest read. The proposals reveal a fundamental mismatch in regulatory design: lawmakers want both compliance and revenue, but the tax structure punishes compliance. If traders migrate to unregulated stablecoins and DeFi to avoid the 31.4% rate, France’s tax base shrinks while regulatory visibility into the market declines. The real cost is not the rate itself but the incentive structure it creates.

The October 20 (Tuesday) full assembly vote on the revenue section will determine whether these amendments advance to law or face further revision. France’s National Assembly must pass the entire 2027 budget by December 10, leaving narrow time for negotiation if the current measures face rejection or substantial amendments during plenary debate.

EU finance ministers centralize crypto exchange oversight under single watchdog

EU finance ministers centralize crypto exchange oversight under single watchdog

, , , , ,

European Union finance ministers have agreed to centralize oversight of the bloc’s largest crypto exchanges under a single watchdog, closing a regulatory gap that allowed firms licensed in one country to serve all 27 member states with minimal cross-border scrutiny. The shift marks the first major structural overhaul of MiCA supervision since the regulation took effect, though it will affect only a small fraction of the estimated 360 crypto service providers operating in Europe.

  • Only 10 to 15 of roughly 360 crypto providers would qualify for centralized ESMA supervision under the new framework.
  • Firms meeting at least 15 million active EU users or three of five additional criteria would face direct European Securities and Markets Authority oversight.
  • The Council’s agreement sets negotiating terms; final rules require European Parliament approval and formal interinstitutional talks.
  • 15 million Active EU users threshold for triggering centralized ESMA supervision
  • €1 billion Crypto assets under custody as one significance criterion
  • €4 billion Annual client transactions as another threshold measure
  • Over 18 Separate pieces of EU legislation amended in the Market Integration and Supervision Package

EU finance ministers reached a political agreement on Friday (October 9) to transfer direct supervision of the bloc’s most significant crypto-asset service providers to the European Securities and Markets Authority, addressing what regulators view as a fundamental weakness in the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation. According to reporting by CryptoSlate, the overhaul is considerably narrower than the European Commission’s original proposal to move all crypto providers under centralized control. The agreement forms part of a broader Market Integration and Supervision Package designed to strengthen European capital markets. Tánaiste and Minister for Finance of Ireland Simon Harris stated that the deal represents “a huge achievement for the Irish Presidency” and noted the package “will boost our competitiveness, contribute to improved living standards, and ensure that the EU remains a leading destination for global investment.”

The EU’s long-term prosperity will depend on our ability to innovate, invest, and compete. Open, well-functioning and integrated European capital markets are an essential pillar of the Single Market.

Tánaiste and Minister for Finance of Ireland Simon Harris

How MiCA’s passporting system exposed regulatory gaps across Europe

MiCA’s current framework permits a crypto firm licensed in any single member state to offer approved services throughout the entire European Union without establishing physical presence elsewhere. This “passporting” arrangement was designed to reduce compliance duplication for firms expanding across borders. However, it concentrates supervisory authority in a single national regulator whose approval can affect crypto customers and market infrastructure across all 27 member states, even when other regulators would apply different scrutiny standards.

A July 2025 peer review by ESMA exposed the practical consequences of this model. The review of Malta Financial Services Authority’s authorization of an unnamed crypto provider found insufficient evidence that the licensing assessment adequately addressed governance, conflicts of interest, technology infrastructure, custody arrangements and anti-money-laundering risks. ESMA’s assessment questioned why the company received approval while material issues remained unresolved.

Malta subsequently defended its regulatory process, arguing in September 2025 that MiCA was too new to justify an additional regulatory layer and warning that centralization could introduce bureaucracy and hamper competitiveness. The authority did credit the Maltese regulator with sector expertise and sufficient supervisory resources, while recommending improvements to its authorization process rather than wholesale transfer of authority.

New significance thresholds would capture only the largest cross-border operators

Under the Council’s draft framework, ESMA would assume direct supervision of crypto providers meeting either of two principal thresholds: at least 15 million active EU users, or three of five additional significance criteria. The supplementary measures include more than 1 million active users, over €1 billion in crypto assets under custody, more than €4 billion in annual client transactions, and broader measures of financial interconnectedness to the EU banking system. Together, these factors mean a provider’s overall scale and systemic connections, rather than its country of incorporation alone, would determine whether supervision moves to ESMA.

Officials estimate that only 10 to 15 of the roughly 360 current crypto service providers would cross these thresholds and require direct ESMA oversight. The remaining majority would continue operating under national regulators, though ESMA would coordinate through guidelines, peer reviews and coordinated investigations to address uneven enforcement across jurisdictions.

ESMA would gain powers to request information from directly supervised firms, conduct inspections, investigate breaches, and impose financial penalties. The agency could also restrict services or withdraw authorization where firms do not meet regulatory requirements. The agreement establishes a full-time ESMA executive board, including a chair and five independent members, to handle operational and company-specific decisions separate from broader policy coordination involving national regulators.

Transition timeline and remaining negotiations set implementation pace

The Council’s agreement sets the institution’s negotiating position ahead of formal talks with the European Parliament, which must now establish its own stance on the proposal. The Market Integration and Supervision Package amends over 18 separate pieces of EU legislation and will require interinstitutional negotiation before either body can formally vote. Existing MiCA licenses for companies brought under direct ESMA supervision would remain valid during a proposed two-year transition period, avoiding the need for firms to seek new authorization immediately.

Key open questions include the final thresholds that will trigger centralized oversight, ESMA’s available resources and staffing for the expanded mandate, and how crypto providers near the boundary between national and centralized supervision will be treated during transition.

The BlockWest read. The narrowing from the Commission’s original proposal to supervise all crypto providers down to 10-15 firms reflects a political compromise that preserves national regulatory authority for the fragmented market majority. Institutional investors and custody providers operating at scale should monitor how ESMA defines the five supplementary significance criteria in final negotiations, as minor threshold adjustments could determine whether their counterparties face unified or multi-jurisdictional oversight.

The European Parliament must now develop its negotiating position before the two institutions can begin formal trilogue negotiations. The outcome of those talks will determine whether the thresholds shift upward (capturing fewer firms and leaving more gaps) or downward (expanding ESMA’s direct caseload), and when the two-year transition to centralized supervision begins for firms that cross the line.

Financial Stability Board warns stablecoins pose untested cross-border risks

Financial Stability Board warns stablecoins pose untested cross-border risks

, , , , ,

The Financial Stability Board has identified critical gaps in global stablecoin regulation that could amplify financial stress during a market crisis. The FSB’s call for cross-border coordination comes as the sector has nearly doubled in size since the start of 2025, yet remains untested under severe conditions.

  • Stablecoin market capitalization grew from $206 billion at the start of 2025 to $306 billion today.
  • Multi-issuer stablecoins can trap reserves in one jurisdiction while redemption demands concentrate in another, complicating crisis response.
  • The FSB warns that national regulations develop at different speeds, leaving holders’ recovery uncertain if an issuer becomes insolvent.
  • $306B Current stablecoin market capitalization, up 49 percent since start of 2025
  • 24/7 Stablecoin trading frequency versus limited hours for underlying asset markets

CoinDesk reported that the Financial Stability Board, the G20’s primary financial watchdog, has warned that stablecoins and their national regulatory regimes remain untested in severe market crises and pose cross-border risks that existing financial rules may not address. In a report released as markets prepare for the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors’ October 15 (Thursday) meeting, the FSB identified structural vulnerabilities in how stablecoins operate globally while their regulatory frameworks develop unevenly across jurisdictions. The watchdog called for enhanced cross-border information sharing, monitoring protocols, and contingency planning for stablecoin distress or failure scenarios.

Multi-issuer structures create concentration risk during redemptions

The FSB highlighted particular dangers in multi-issuer stablecoin models, where affiliated companies issue the same token and share liability while maintaining reserve assets in separate jurisdictions. If stablecoin holders can redeem from any issuer within the group, redemption demand could accumulate at a single entity while the reserves needed to meet those demands sit in another jurisdiction, the report warned. During a crisis, moving those reserves across borders may become impossible or prohibitively costly, leaving an issuer unable to satisfy redemptions even if the group collectively holds sufficient assets.

The jurisdictional fragmentation also creates legal uncertainty. If an issuer becomes insolvent, it may be unclear which country’s insolvency rules apply, potentially leaving creditors competing across multiple legal systems.

24/7 trading creates timing mismatches with traditional asset markets

Stablecoins trade continuously while the markets for assets backing them operate on fixed schedules, a structural mismatch that could amplify instability during runs. If redemption demand accelerates faster than an issuer can liquidate backing assets during market closures, the stablecoin may lose its peg to its intended reference currency. When that happens, forced sales of reserves could cascade into traditional financial markets as investors scramble to recover liquidity, potentially spreading the shock beyond the crypto sector.

The FSB acknowledged that deep and liquid secondary markets could theoretically arrest a depeg through arbitrage, pulling the token back toward its intended value.

Weak data on stablecoin holders impedes coordinated crisis response

The pseudonymous nature of cryptocurrency transactions prevents regulators from identifying where stablecoin holders are based and which jurisdictions should apply their rules, the FSB said. This data gap makes cross-border coordination during a crisis harder to execute and leaves uncertainty over which authority bears responsibility for protecting which holders. Andrew Bailey, FSB Chair and Governor of the Bank of England, wrote in an accompanying letter that “global stablecoin arrangements are inherently cross-border, yet national regulations are taking shape at different speeds and cross-border cooperation in this area is still in its infancy.”

Global stablecoin arrangements are inherently cross-border, yet national regulations are taking shape at different speeds and cross-border cooperation in this area is still in its infancy.

Andrew Bailey, Chair of the Financial Stability Board and Governor of the Bank of England

The FSB’s recommendations are not legally binding, though FSB members typically commit to implementing agreed standards within their national frameworks. Bailey has previously warned that international stablecoin rulemaking has stalled, and the latest report signals renewed pressure from the financial establishment to establish coordinated rules before the sector encounters a stress event.

The BlockWest read. The FSB’s framing treats stablecoin crises as inevitable rather than hypothetical, yet offers no timeline for binding rules. Institutions holding stablecoins or exposed to their reserve assets should treat the current regulatory vacuum as a material risk rather than awaiting formal standards that may take years to harmonize across jurisdictions.

The FSB report precedes the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors’ October 15 meeting, where stablecoin coordination is expected to feature on the agenda. Watch whether the G20 commits to a deadline for national regulators to implement cross-border information-sharing protocols and whether Bailey’s Bank of England issues guidance on how UK-domiciled stablecoin issuers should report holder locations and reserve custody arrangements.

IMF validates demand for tokenized stocks despite volatility and illiquidity concerns

IMF validates demand for tokenized stocks despite volatility and illiquidity concerns

, , , , , , ,

The International Monetary Fund has identified genuine demand for tokenized stocks, validating a key use case for blockchain finance, but warns that fragmentation, volatility and illiquidity remain material obstacles to wider adoption. Regulators and market participants must establish interoperability standards and legal frameworks before the market scales beyond its current $2.3 billion size.

  • More than half of tokenized stock trades occur outside regular U.S. market hours, with approximately 80% of trades involving fractional shares.
  • Tokenized equities are roughly 1.5 times as volatile as traditional shares and significantly less liquid, according to IMF analysis.
  • The tokenized equity market represents $2.3 billion of a $65 billion real-world asset tokenization space, compared to $160 trillion in global equity market capitalization.
  • $2.3 billion Tokenized equities market share of total $65 billion RWA sector
  • 80% Share of tokenized stock trades involving fractional ownership, sub-one-share transactions
  • 85% Overnight price moves reflected in traditional shares within five minutes of market open
  • 1.5x Volatility of tokenized equities relative to traditional equivalent shares

CoinDesk reported that the International Monetary Fund’s latest Global Financial Stability Report examined the five most actively traded tokenized U.S. equities, including Tesla (TSLA), Nvidia (NVDA) and Alphabet (GOOG), as well as the Nasdaq 100 Index, across centralized and decentralized trading venues. The study found that tokenized stocks are delivering on two long-promised benefits of blockchain finance: round-the-clock trading and fractional ownership. Yet the IMF also documented significant trade-offs: tokenized equities remain markedly more volatile and substantially less liquid than their traditional counterparts.

Round-the-clock trading and fractional shares show real investor demand

The IMF’s analysis of trading patterns reveals that market participants are actively using tokenized equities for their practical advantages. More than half of all trades in tokenized stocks occurred outside regular U.S. market hours, demonstrating sustained demand for 24/7 access. About 80% of trades involved less than one share, showing that investors value the ability to purchase fractional ownership at lower entry points.

The overnight price discovery in tokenized markets also carries measurable information. More than 85% of overnight movement in tokenized shares was reflected in their traditional counterparts within five minutes of U.S. market open, according to the IMF. This price correlation suggests that tokenized venues are contributing to overall price efficiency rather than operating in isolation.

Volatility and illiquidity pose structural challenges to market growth

The IMF’s report found that tokenized equities are approximately 1.5 times as volatile as equivalent shares on traditional venues and significantly less liquid overall. The root cause is not simply the nascency of blockchain markets, the IMF argued, but rather fragmentation across incompatible systems. Today’s market is split across private platforms, public blockchains, custodians and settlement tools that frequently do not interoperate.

This fragmentation prevents the tokenized equity market from achieving the cost and time savings that the technology theoretically enables. The IMF noted that tokenization could eventually replace manual record reconciliation, automate dividend payments and speed up collateral transfers. However, realizing these benefits requires sufficient issuers, investors, trading venues and settlement assets operating on compatible infrastructure.

Market expansion requires legal clarity and interoperability standards before scaling

The tokenized real-world asset market has grown rapidly to approximately $65 billion as of July 31, with tokenized equities accounting for roughly $2.3 billion of that total. For context, global equity market capitalization reached just under $160 trillion in 2025, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. The IMF’s assessment is that while tokenized stocks show real use cases, the market remains too small and fragmented to present systemic risk today.

Multiple platforms are now entering the space. Bullish, a Gibraltar-based crypto company and CoinDesk’s parent, introduced tokenized equity trading in August. Earlier in October, OKX and Intercontinental Exchange, which owns and operates the New York Stock Exchange, filed plans for a venue offering round-the-clock trading in tokenized U.S. shares. Crypto exchanges Coinbase Global (COIN), Kraken and Binance also offer tokenized stock trading, as does Robinhood Markets (HOOD).

The IMF warned that automated margin calls, liquidations and collateral movement between platforms could make market shocks harder to contain as trading expands to 24 hours daily.

The fund stated that legal rules governing ownership, safeguards for liquidity, interoperability between systems and settlement arrangements must be developed before the market grows substantially larger. Bitget CEO Gracy Chen told the IMF that “moving assets onchain is only the first step. The bigger question is how efficiently that capital can work once it is there.”

Moving assets onchain is only the first step. The bigger question is how efficiently that capital can work once it is there.

Gracy Chen, CEO of Bitget

The BlockWest read. The IMF’s findings matter to institutional allocators and settlement infrastructure providers because they quantify what works in tokenization (pricing efficiency, access) and what remains broken (liquidity, volatility). Before capital flows meaningfully into tokenized equities, market participants need interoperable custody and settlement layers that today’s fragmented ecosystem does not yet provide.

Regulators and exchanges must clarify the legal ownership framework and liquidity safeguards for tokenized equities before material capital migration from traditional markets occurs. The interoperability standard that enables seamless settlement across multiple platforms will determine whether tokenized equity trading becomes a marginal feature or a meaningful share of overall equity trading volume.

G7 releases 100 million barrels to test inflation’s impact on Bitcoin

G7 releases 100 million barrels to test inflation’s impact on Bitcoin

, , , , , , , ,

The G7 agreed Friday (October 2) to accelerate emergency fuel reserve releases, betting that cheaper diesel can ease inflation pressure that has kept the Federal Reserve on a hawkish path. For Bitcoin traders, the 20-day window the group set now offers a dated test of whether a fix for energy supply can move rate expectations enough to matter for crypto markets.

  • G7 leaders agreed Friday (October 2) to release 100 million barrels through the IEA over four months, starting immediately.
  • The Federal Reserve raised its target rate by 25 basis points to 3.75% to 4% on Sept. 16, citing persistent inflation.
  • US on-highway diesel averaged $6.382 a gallon on Sept. 28, down 14.7 cents week-over-week but $2.628 above a year earlier.
  • 100M bbl IEA emergency oil release spread across four months
  • 3.75%-4% Fed’s target rate range after its Sept. 16 hike
  • $6.382 US average diesel price per gallon on Sept. 28
  • 20 days deadline for the frontloaded diesel release and IEA report

G7 leaders held a virtual meeting Friday (October 2) and agreed to speed up releases from emergency fuel reserves, aiming to contain diesel shortages and elevated prices that have fed into broader inflation, according to the G7 Leaders’ Statement on global energy security and market stability. The group said the International Energy Agency would make 100 million barrels available over four months beginning immediately, including a frontloaded, substantial diesel release within the first 20 days. For crypto markets, as CryptoSlate reported, what matters is not the barrel count itself but whether the release pushes refined-fuel costs down enough to shift the inflation and rate expectations that have weighed on Bitcoin.

G7 pledges refinery coordination and no new export bans

The statement treats refining capacity, not crude supply alone, as the binding constraint on diesel availability. Leaders said they would coordinate maintenance schedules across G7 refineries to prevent simultaneous shutdowns and temporarily raise utilization rates where feasible, while encouraging countries with significant refining capacity to boost diesel output.

The group also reaffirmed it would not impose export restrictions on energy products between G7 members and called on all producers to avoid bans that could worsen market tensions. It condemned Iran’s attacks on regional neighbors and disruption of trade, calling for restored navigational rights in the Strait of Hormuz, and said it would maintain sanctions on Russia while working with the IEA to limit spillover into fuel and gas markets.

March’s 400 million barrel pledge already covers most of the new volume

The October release is not 100 million new barrels layered on top of existing commitments. It implements pledges the IEA’s 32 member countries first made in March, when they agreed to make 400 million barrels available from emergency stocks following disruption tied to the Middle East conflict, according to the IEA. The G7 statement said the new release accounts for commitments “already been fulfilled,” meaning the October figure overlaps with, rather than fully adds to, the March pledge.

The incremental new supply is therefore unclear from the statement alone. The IEA has been asked to report on implementation and market impact within 20 days, including whether further diesel releases or eventual stock replenishment are warranted, per the statement.

Diesel’s next price test lands Tuesday, October 6

US diesel prices were already retreating before the G7 announcement. The Energy Information Administration put the national on-highway average at $6.382 a gallon on Sept. 28, down 14.7 cents from a week earlier, a decline that predates the Oct. 2 agreement and makes subsequent readings more useful for judging the intervention’s effect. Diesel remained $2.628 a gallon above its year-earlier level, keeping fuel costs elevated enough to matter for transportation and goods inflation.

Bitcoin remains sensitive to Treasury yields, dollar strength and broader liquidity conditions after the Fed lifted its target range by 25 basis points to 3.75% to 4% on Sept. 16, citing persistently elevated inflation. A sustained drop in energy costs could ease one source of that pressure, though the G7 plan alone gives investors little basis to expect a near-term reversal in monetary policy.

Investors will get the first US diesel price reading since the G7 agreement on Tuesday (October 6).

The BlockWest read. For allocators treating Bitcoin as a macro-liquidity trade, this is a data-dependent setup rather than a catalyst to position around now. The transmission chain runs from barr

IMF releases $138 million to El Salvador despite Bitcoin accumulation waiver

IMF releases $138 million to El Salvador despite Bitcoin accumulation waiver

, , , , , , ,

The International Monetary Fund has released $138 million to El Salvador despite the government missing a key pledge to stop buying Bitcoin, a sign the Fund is prioritizing broader fiscal progress over strict compliance with its crypto conditions. The waiver keeps El Salvador’s $1.4 billion loan program intact even as President Nayib Bukele’s administration continues to hold Bitcoin on its balance sheet.

  • The IMF Executive Board completed the second and third reviews of El Salvador’s Extended Fund Facility on October 1.
  • The disbursement equals SDR 101.96 million, or roughly $138 million, part of a $1.4 billion program agreed in February 2025.
  • Majority ownership and control of the government’s Chivo Bitcoin wallet has shifted to a private operator.
  • $138M latest IMF disbursement approved after the Bitcoin waiver
  • $1.4B total financing available under the 40-month EFF program
  • Oct. 1 date IMF board completed second and third program reviews
  • 40 mo. length of program El Salvador entered in February 2025

The International Monetary Fund has approved a disbursement worth SDR 101.96 million, equivalent to about $138 million, for El Salvador after granting the government a waiver for failing to meet a Bitcoin accumulation condition tied to its loan program. The IMF Executive Board signed off on the payout after completing the second and third reviews of El Salvador’s Extended Fund Facility arrangement on October 1. The story was first reported by CryptoPotato.

IMF grants waiver over Bitcoin accumulation shortfall

El Salvador’s economy has outperformed expectations, the Fund said, citing improved security conditions and stronger investor confidence. Fiscal consolidation has broadly stayed on track and reserve and liquidity buffers have strengthened.

Even so, the government did not meet every program condition, including a commitment related to its Bitcoin holdings. The IMF granted waivers based on what it described as corrective measures and renewed commitments from Salvadoran authorities, according to the IMF’s press release on the completed reviews.

Under the revised terms, El Salvador is not expected to add to its Bitcoin stockpile beyond donations that are formally documented. The IMF statement said the government is working to shrink its footprint in Bitcoin-related activity, including steps to improve transparency around public-sector crypto holdings and tighten oversight of crypto-asset firms operating in the country. “No further Bitcoin accumulation is envisaged beyond the documented donations,” the Fund said in its release, adding that efforts will continue to reduce the state’s involvement in Bitcoin-related activities, strengthen crypto-asset regulation and governance, and enhance transparency regarding public-sector holdings.

Chivo wallet moves to private control

El Salvador’s state-run Chivo digital wallet, once central to the country’s push to make Bitcoin legal tender, has shifted toward private management. The IMF said majority ownership and control of Chivo have been transferred to a private operator, with remaining public-sector exposure expected to be unwound over time.

The change marks a retreat from the direct government role Chivo played since its 2021 launch alongside El Salvador’s Bitcoin legal-tender law. No timeline for the full unwinding of public exposure was given in the IMF’s statement.

$1.4 billion program still hinges on pension and governance reforms

El Salvador agreed to the 40-month IMF program in February 2025, with total access of about $1.4 billion. The $138 million disbursement now approved is the latest tranche within that broader arrangement, following the completed second and third reviews.

The IMF said further work remains to strengthen public finances, rebuild external reserves and shore up financial-sector resilience. Pension and civil service reforms, which had faced earlier delays, are expected to move forward under the program’s next phase.

The Fund also called for stronger governance, pointing to public-sector reporting, beneficial ownership disclosures, asset declarations and anti-money-laundering rules as priority areas. It described these measures as crucial to maintaining economic stability.

The BlockWest read. The waiver shows the IMF treating Bitcoin policy as negotiable so long as fiscal metrics hold, which gives Bukele room to keep sovereign holdings on the books while outsourcing operational risk through Chivo’s privatization. For allocators watching sovereign Bitcoin exposure as a template, the real signal is that IMF financing now effectively caps future accumulation without forcing disposal of existing coins.

El Salvador’s next test comes as the IMF tracks whether pension and civil service reforms, delayed once already, advance under the remaining reviews of the 40-month program before it concludes.

ESMA asks EU to ban custody services for noncompliant stablecoins

ESMA asks EU to ban custody services for noncompliant stablecoins

, , , , , ,

Europe’s securities regulator wants to close what it sees as a loophole that lets banks and exchanges keep safeguarding and moving stablecoins that have already failed the bloc’s compliance test. If European lawmakers adopt the proposal, holders of noncompliant tokens could lose access to licensed custody and transfer services even if they never intend to trade again.

  • ESMA’s September 30, 2026 submission asks the EU Commission to ban every licensable crypto-asset service for stablecoins that fail MiCA
  • The ban would cover custody and transfer, reversing ESMA’s January 2025 approach that those services could continue after delisting
  • No implementation date, withdrawal exception, or wind-down mechanism appears anywhere in ESMA’s September submission
  • 9/30/26 deadline for ESMA’s response to the EU Commission’s MiCA review consultation
  • 1/17/25 date of ESMA’s statement distinguishing services for delisted stablecoins
  • ~6 pts USDC’s estimated trading-share gain over USDT on EU-facing exchanges
  • ~20% estimated drop in USDT volume on regulated exchanges versus global venues

The European Securities and Markets Authority has asked the European Commission to bar licensed firms from providing custody and transfer services for stablecoins that fail the bloc’s Markets in Crypto-Assets requirements, not just from listing them for trading, according to reporting by CryptoSlate. The request appears in ESMA’s response to the Commission’s MiCA review consultation, filed Wednesday (September 30, 2026), the deadline the Commission had set for input.

The change would reach existing holders who have stopped trading, not just new buyers. That marks a reversal from ESMA’s own position about twenty months earlier.

ESMA’s September filing would turn delisting into a full service ban

ESMA’s submission asks the Commission to prohibit every licensable crypto-asset service involving stablecoins that fail MiCA’s applicable requirements, replacing the current activity-by-activity approach with a single asset-compliance test. Under MiCA’s Article 3 definitions, custody and transfer are both explicitly listed crypto-asset services alongside trading-platform operation and order execution. Custody covers safekeeping or controlling a client’s crypto-assets or their private keys, while transfer covers moving assets between ledger addresses on a client’s behalf.

ESMA argues the absence of a clear prohibition creates disparities between compliant and noncompliant issuers and opens the door to regulatory arbitrage. Article 82 already sets client-agreement requirements specifically for transfer services, underlining that lawmakers treat the activity as distinct from simple trading. ESMA’s September response does not propose an implementation date, an exception for existing balances, or any wind-down mechanism for providers already holding the affected tokens.

Binance’s 2025 delisting shows what the old rule actually allowed

ESMA’s January 17, 2025 statement drew a line between offering a token to the public or admitting it to trading, and simply holding or moving it for an existing customer. Platforms had to stop making noncompliant tokens available for trading, with acquisition restrictions expected by the end of January 2025 and temporary sell-only services permitted through the end of that quarter, but custody and transfer could continue.

Binance illustrated that distinction in practice. CryptoSlate reported in March 2025 that the exchange planned to remove nine tokens’ trading pairs for European Economic Area users by March 31, 2025, while keeping deposits, withdrawals, conversions and custody available.

Separate research underscores how narrow that earlier shift was. A July 2026 paper by Nicola Borri and Kirill Shakhnov, using CryptoCompare daily pair-volume data from January 1, 2024 through December 7, 2025 across 14 exchanges, estimates that around the April 1, 2025 delisting event USDC’s share of combined USDT-USDC trading rose roughly six percentage points on “regulated-facing” exchanges relative to globally oriented venues such as Binance. The gain came mainly from an estimated 20% drop in USDT volume on those regulated venues, while the change in USDC volume itself was not statistically significant, and aggregate USDC-to-USDT ratios across the full sample stayed nearly flat.

What ESMA’s new text does not say about returning client assets

Existing custody rules under MiCA’s Article 75 require providers to segregate client assets from their own holdings and to return clients’ crypto-assets or their means of access as soon as possible. A European Commission answer relayed through ESMA on February 18, 2026 adds that assets returned must match the type held at the time of a withdrawal request, with conversion into fiat or another crypto-asset only available if the client requests it and the provider holds separate permission for that service.

ESMA’s September submission does not reconcile a blanket custody ban with that return obligation. Section 3.2 of the filing leaves the mechanics of any exit untouched.

The Commission’s consultation page notes that its resulting review report may, if warranted, be followed by a legislative proposal, but no text or timetable has been published. Until then, ESMA’s filing remains a policy submission rather than binding law.

The BlockWest read. Custodians and exchanges serving EU customers should start modeling which stablecoin balances sit outside MiCA compliance today, because a ban with no wind-down clause would force rapid, possibly disorderly exits rather than orderly conversions. Compliant issuers gain a distribution edge in European custody and settlement rails regardless of global trading volumes, which the Borri-Shakhnov data suggest have barely moved.

The next concrete marker is whether the European Commission’s MiCA review report, due after the consultation’s September 30, 2026 close, includes a legislative proposal adopting ESMA’s custody-and-transfer ban, and if so, what exception it carves out for balances providers already hold.

FCA’s February 2027 deadline blocks late crypto applicants from new UK customer business

FCA’s February 2027 deadline blocks late crypto applicants from new UK customer business

, , , , , ,

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority has opened applications for crypto regulation, but firms that miss the February 2027 deadline face severe restrictions on serving existing customers. This creates a narrow window for platforms to secure ongoing operations and a sharp dividing line between early and late applicants in the world’s most stringent crypto regime to date.

  • The FCA opened its authorization gateway on September 30, with applications closing February 28, 2027, ahead of the full regime starting October 25, 2027.
  • Existing firms applying by the deadline can continue serving customers and take new business while their application is pending, provided a decision has not yet been made.
  • Platforms applying after February 28 can only serve new contracts necessary to fulfil agreements made before entering transition, blocking all new business with both existing and new UK customers.
  • Feb. 28, 2027 Deadline for applications to qualify for saving provision protecting pending applicants
  • Oct. 25, 2027 Date the full crypto regulatory regime comes into force across the UK
  • 2 years Maximum duration of the saving provision after the regime’s commencement date
  • 2 years Maximum period late applicants can operate under transitional run-off arrangements

CryptoSlate reported that the FCA’s authorization window creates a binary outcome for crypto platforms seeking to operate in the UK. Firms applying by February 28, 2027 gain a form of temporary protection that lets them continue accepting new customers if their approval remains pending when the regime begins in October. Those that miss the deadline face a fundamentally different legal position: they can only fulfill contracts entered before transition, effectively barring them from opening new accounts or expanding relationships with existing customers.

Early applicants retain new business rights while pending approval

Crypto providers that submit applications during the FCA’s gateway window can continue their existing services and take on new business while awaiting a decision, according to the FCA’s announcement. This saving provision is not automatic authorization, however. The protection only covers the specific activities listed in the application and expires two years after October 25, 2027, giving firms a finite window to obtain full permission or exit the market.

The FCA can still terminate this protection if criminal enforcement, consumer protection or regulatory objectives require it, directing firms into restricted run-off arrangements instead.

An application submitted during the window does not guarantee approval. The FCA’s standards require clear demonstration of compliance across consumer protection, asset safeguarding, market integrity and financial resilience. Platforms that cannot meet these standards will not receive authorization and will be required to cease offering regulated crypto services in the UK when the full regime arrives.

Late applicants face near-total prohibition on new customer onboarding

The rules governing late applications create a stark contrast with the protection afforded early filers. Under the statutory framework, a firm that applies after February 28 but before October 25, 2027 enters a transitional provision while its application is assessed. During this period, it can only perform contracts entered into before transition began, effectively freezing its customer base.

Having an existing account with a platform does not, by itself, preserve that customer’s access to new services.

This restriction applies equally to new UK customers and existing UK customers. A late applicant authorized before commencement avoids the transitional phase altogether, but a late applicant still awaiting a decision on October 25 enters run-off mode. The gateway rules specify that transitional provisions last a maximum of two years, after which the firm must complete its UK wind-down. Firms must notify the FCA and all existing contract parties, with customer notices explaining the lack of authorization and any changes to asset protection or compensation arrangements.

Overseas platforms and existing regulated firms face separate compliance paths

Crypto providers based outside the UK that serve UK consumers can fall within the scope of the new regime, though specific intermediary and custody exceptions apply. These firms face the same application deadlines and outcomes as UK-based platforms.

Existing anti-money-laundering registration does not automatically convert into authorization under the new crypto rules.

Firms already authorized under the Financial Services and Markets Act for other activities must apply to vary their permissions if they intend to offer regulated crypto services. According to the FCA’s guidance on how the gateway will operate, an existing registration therefore does not determine whether a provider will hold the required permission, qualify for pending-application protection or face run-off restrictions when the full regime begins. For Bitcoin and crypto trading platforms, the relevant regulated activities include trading platforms, dealing and arranging transactions, and custody.

The BlockWest read. The February deadline creates a cliff-edge for platform balance sheets and customer acquisition strategies. Existing operators have built-in optionality during the assessment period, while new entrants and stragglers lose the ability to grow. UK-focused crypto platforms face a choice: apply now and lock in a two-year protection window even if approval is delayed, or bet they can complete authorization by late October and avoid the run-off trap entirely. The FCA has not clarified how long it expects assessments to take.

The FCA expects to determine applications submitted during the application period before the new regime comes into force on October 25, 2027. The central question remains how many pending applications will still be unresolved at that date and how the FCA’s capacity to assess hundreds of crypto firms will affect approval timelines between now and February 28.

Load More

Back To Top
© BlockWest 2026
BlockWest Media LLC

Equities, AI, and blue-chip crypto, covered as one connected market.

Sections

Company

Legal

Follow

𝕏 ▶ in

© 2026 BlockWest. All rights reserved.