Snowflake’s upbeat AI outlook is turning into a broader software trade, with a wave of enterprise names rallying alongside it and Jim Cramer flagging more room to run.
The move adds to a stretch of earnings this season where AI-linked spending has repeatedly rewarded shareholders, even as some investors question how long richly priced software names can keep climbing.
AI is Driving the Software Firm
Snowflake shares jumped 23% on Thursday after the cloud data platform lifted its fiscal 2027 product revenue forecast to $6.07 billion, up from $5.84 billion, alongside a 37% year-over-year jump in second-quarter product revenue.
Snowflake jumped as much as 23% on its earnings. Image Source: Trading View
CEO Sridhar Ramaswamy said artificial intelligence (AI) tools are now driving growth across Snowflake’s core platform, not just its standalone AI products, calling it a compounding “flywheel effect” for the business.
Shares hit their highest level since December 2021, adding roughly $25 billion in market value in the move. The stock has now climbed 39% for the year, more than triple the S&P 500’s 12% gain over the same stretch.
Software Stocks Move Together
The rally spilled into peers. ServiceNow, Salesforce’s record earnings run, Atlassian, Adobe, and Intuit all climbed between 3.5% and 6%, while the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF added 3%.
Morgan Stanley analysts said the pattern of consistently faster growth in recent quarters shows AI is meaningfully driving usage of Snowflake’s own platform, beyond its dedicated AI tools.
At least 34 brokerages raised their price targets following the results, according to data compiled by LSEG, with Wells Fargo issuing a Street-high call of $525. Snowflake now trades near 15 times forward revenue, well above the software-sector ETF’s 7.4 times, and its 121.8 times forward earnings dwarfs Datadog’s 72.7 times and MongoDB’s 52.1 times.
CNBC’s Jim Cramer weighed in after the report, flagging a huge move still ahead for the stock, and calling it the cleanest way for cautious enterprises to buy AI compute on demand.
So Snowflake remains the best way for the uncertain to get compute but Broadcom tells a story of an explosion of business coming. Snowflake will have a huge move…
So Snowflake remains the best way for the uncertain to get compute but Broadcom tells a story of an explosion of business coming. Snowflake will have a huge move…. Broadcom? More nuanced…
Whether that momentum holds may depend on how quickly Snowflake and its peers can turn rising AI demand into durable margin, rather than just top-line growth.
Palantir Technologies’ stock jumped approximately 8% on Thursday, recovering from the previous session’s nearly 6% decline and trading near $183.
The rebound came even as prominent short-seller Michael Burry, known for his role in “The Big Short,” renewed his long-standing bearish critique of the company.
In a detailed post on X early Thursday, Burry reiterated that Palantir is back in the stratosphere and that the facts have not changed. He described the firm as a consultant riding a bubble of AI FOMO demand and warned that its market cap could eventually fall well below $100 billion.
Burry focused on accounts receivable trends, noting that receivables had grown faster than revenue in 9 of the last 12 quarters, with one customer accounting for about 25% of receivables while contributing less than 10% of revenue.
He also highlighted rising days sales outstanding, deferred revenue patterns resembling those of consulting firms like Accenture rather than pure SaaS peers, elevated stock-based compensation, and large net operating losses. Burry disclosed that he remains short the stock and holds put options.
“…Any way I slice it, Palantir is losing either bargaining power or it is channel stuffing, or both. The former is a weak business position, and the latter a crime. Do not laugh. That latter possibility is actually not so far out there. The pattern supports potential channel stuffing, perhaps even more than a loss of bargaining position, and again they are not mutually exclusive…,” Michael Burry said on X.
Why the PwC Deal Sent the Stock Higher, at Least for a Day
Despite the high-profile criticism, investors largely shrugged it off. The primary catalyst for the sharp rebound was the announcement of an expanded strategic alliance between Palantir and PwC US.
The collaboration combines Palantir’s Foundry and Artificial Intelligence Platform with PwC’s industry expertise, engineering capabilities, and managed services.
The main focus of this deal is an AI-native deals platform. It’s designed to execute transactions up to 50% faster while reducing one-time costs by up to 45%.
That momentum held through the close. PLTR finished the session at $183.03, up 8.01%, or $13.57, from the previous close of $169.46, according to TradingView data.
Over a longer horizon, the stock is down 1.36% over the past five days but remains up 25.69% for the month and 21.27% over six months. Year-to-date, shares sit modestly positive, up 0.63%, a far cry from the essentially flat picture seen just weeks earlier.
Have you heard of AGI? Artificial General Intelligence. It’s the idea that AI can handle cognitive work at a human level. For years, it was just hypothetical, a Hollywood movie concept at best. Now, OpenAI says they have achieved it – with ChatGPT 6 Astra.
In theory, an AGI could read a legal document, write an article, solve a maths problem, plan a trip, learn a new software tool, and explain its reasoning – all at the same time. OpenAI just showed this exact thing in a ChatGPT 6 demo video.
In plain English, Astra is designed to do more than answer questions. It can use a computer, browse websites, work across software, and keep going through long tasks with less hand-holding.
OpenAI’s own benchmarks show the biggest gains in areas where AI has traditionally struggled: acting on its own.
What is being tested?
GPT-6 Astra
GPT-5.6 Sol
Claude Fable 5.1
Completing multi-step tasks
41.4%
18.1%
31.4%
Advanced coding
74.1%
70.8%
67.4%
Scientific computer work
64.6%
22.4%
52.6%
Extremely difficult maths
97.6%
83.0%
87.8%
Turning images into 3D designs
95.9%
83.3%
84.3%
The comparisons come from OpenAI and vendor-reported evaluations, so independent testing will matter.
So if you’re a ChatGPT user, what does this new model provide? Astra should be better at actually doing things for you.
OpenAI says it can browse webpages, fill forms, work through spreadsheets, and complete multi-step tasks faster than earlier models. It is also the first OpenAI model to reach the company’s “critical” cybersecurity threshold.
What are ChatGPT Users Getting for $20?
Astra is rolling out first to selected enterprise and cybersecurity customers. OpenAI says Plus, Pro, Business and Enterprise users will receive it over the coming days. Free access has not been announced.
That makes the $20-a-month ChatGPT Plus plan more interesting. Standard Astra will be included within existing Plus allowances.
Astra Pro, the higher-end version, is reserved for Pro, Business and Enterprise customers.
Does that make Astra AGI? OpenAI has stopped short of a formal declaration.
Welcome to AGI. ChatGPT 6 Astra just released
In the announcement, Greg Brockman claims this is the AGI era, and Astra might be the first model there
Here is everything you need to know:
1. It is rolling out to businesses now. Personal accounts over the next few days
OpenAI president Brockman called AGI a “gray, fuzzy thing,” while saying he personally believes people may later look back at this model as the moment it arrived.
There is still reason for skepticism. Astra’s eye-catching ARC-AGI-3 result was produced using an OpenAI agent setup with memory and tools around the model, making it harder to isolate Astra’s raw intelligence from the system supporting it.
So, is this the end of human creativity? Perhaps not. But Astra does push ChatGPT further toward something that can increasingly do the work, rather than simply tell you how.
ZEC and XMR are among the market’s top performers over the past 30 days, both experiencing double-digit price increases.
The former remains the largest in the privacy coin sector, so we wanted to check whether it will keep its throne by the end of 2026 or be replaced by some of its competitors. Here’s what three widely used AI-powered chatbots said on the matter.
ZEC Has a Solid Chance
As of this writing, Zcash has a market capitalization of more than $14 billion, making it the 10th-biggest cryptocurrency, and ChatGPT expects the token to finish the year as number one in its niche for various reasons.
First, it noted that ZEC has better exchange accessibility, stating that it is available on major platforms like Binance and Coinbase. In contrast, its biggest competitor, XMR, was removed from the biggest crypto exchange in 2024 and has never been listed on Coinbase.
“This gives ZEC deeper liquidity and easier access for speculative and institutional capital,” the chatbot said.
Another positive development is the recent launch of the first Zcash ETF. The product is issued by Grayscale and represents a conversion from the existing Trust to an exchange-traded fund.
The financial product saw the light of day on August 25, and the social buzz prior to the launch drove a rally to a historic peak above $870. In the following days, ZEC experienced heightened volatility, briefly surpassing that record after reaching nearly $890 before retracing to the current $847 (per CoinGecko).
It is important to note that ChatGPT also praised XMR as a “strong privacy product,” but gave it a 33% chance of topping the ranking by the end of 2026. ZEC, in turn, has a 65% likelihood of keeping its first spot.
Perplexity also ranked Zcash’s token as the leading candidate on this front, giving particular attention to XMR:
“Monero will almost certainly remain the go-to for maximal privacy, but it’s unlikely to outperform ZEC on price and access by year-end under the current regulatory regime.”
More in Favor
Google’s Gemini agreed with the theories presented by the aforementioned chatbots. It claimed that the existence of a ZEC ETF could capture Wall Street liquidity, making it really difficult for XMR to keep pace. Additionally, it noted that the current market cap gap between the two coins is nearly $5 billion.
“For Monero to overtake Zcash by the end of 2026, it would need a massive surge to overcome major hurdles like centralized exchange delistings, slower P2P liquidity, and ZEC’s strong lead from institutional ETF capital. With only a few months remaining, XMR would have to drastically outpace ZEC’s growth – an unlikely scenario barring an unexpected regulatory shift,” Gemini concluded.
Gabriela Santos, J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s chief market strategist for the Americas, said true diversification from the artificial intelligence (AI) trade is now hard to find.
Speaking on CNBC’s “Closing Bell Overtime,” Santos said the AI capital expenditure buildout has grown so large that its effects now touch nearly every asset class, from equities to fixed income and private markets.
A Summer of Hard Lessons
Santos said the summer’s momentum unwind hit AI-linked stocks hardest in July and continued into August. The episode underscored a key lesson for AI-bullish investors.
“You can be really really bullish AI and still need to think really really carefully about portfolio construction.”
She said that means paying closer attention to position sizing, leverage, and diversification. That holds even for investors who remain convinced AI will keep driving an extended earnings cycle.
Santos added that the AI buildout keeps shifting shape, making old sector groupings less reliable. Hyperscalers, chipmakers, and software companies increasingly diverge within their own groups, rather than moving as one block.
The concern echoes warnings elsewhere on Wall Street. One prominent investor has said the market now behaves like a single AI trade.
Where Diversification Still Works
J.P. Morgan built an AI factor basket to test how closely assets and portfolios track the broader AI trade. Santos said the results show most assets now moving together.
Genuine diversification is mostly limited to treasuries, gold, core real estate, and European equities. That scarcity echoes recent warnings about a broader stock-bond diversification collapse.
Historically, bonds reliably cushioned portfolios whenever a recession hit. For two decades after the financial crisis, low yields meant bonds alone did the job.
However, Santos said that dynamic has changed. Competition for capital has returned alongside supply shocks, inflation, and rate volatility. She said investors now need additional inflation-resistant assets to round out their positioning.
Whether that mix holds may depend on how AI-related capital spending evolves through the rest of the year.
Google is entering a multi-year partnership with Beast Industries. The deal brings Gemini and Google Health into Jimmy Donaldson’s MrBeast videos starting September 5.
Donaldson’s crew will lean on the AI assistant to navigate the jungle, desert, and Arctic in a survival challenge. Beast Industries CEO Jeff Housenbold calls it a bet on AI as both a creative engine and a business tool.
A Survival Challenge Built Around Gemini
Donaldson, the first creator to pass 500 million YouTube subscribers, already runs one of the best-funded operations in online video. The new deal extends that reach into Google’s consumer AI push.
Teams in the September 5 video will race through the jungle, desert, and Arctic. Gemini will help them flag dangers and track sudden weather changes.
A separate Gemini ad campaign will show Donaldson using the app to plan the logistics behind his stunts. Google’s new Fitbit Air will appear in a later challenge.
How Much of This Is Actually AI
Housenbold was more measured off camera about what Gemini actually does. Asked directly whether AI drives the video production itself, he drew a clear line.
“What we’re not doing is using it to make the content.”
He said Gemini instead supports research and feasibility work, like figuring out how to pull off stunts. Humans still write, shoot, and edit every video. That is a narrower role than Google’s campaign language implies.
It also echoes how Google is folding AI into other consumer platforms, mostly behind the scenes rather than on screen. Housenbold declined to disclose financial terms. He did note the partnership had sign-off from Google CEO Sundar Pichai.
For now, viewers get a demonstration of Gemini’s planning ability, framed as a survival story. That is a smaller claim than the creative partnership Google’s campaign describes.
The wallet makes USDT and TON spendable through familiar bank QR codes. The shortcut is genuinely useful, but users give up self-custody and accept opaque third-party settlement.
At a café in Bangkok or Hanoi, the merchant sees a familiar local bank QR code. The customer sees a crypto balance. Antarctic Wallet is built to make both sides of that checkout work without asking the merchant to learn anything about USDT, TON, wallets, or blockchains.
That is the product’s sharpest idea. The merchant still receives fiat through the payment rail it already uses. The customer scans the code, approves an amount, and the equivalent crypto leaves an Antarctic balance. The complexity moves out of the checkout and into the settlement layer.
The convenience is real. So is the trade-off.
Antarctic is not a self-custody wallet, the merchant is not receiving crypto, and a payment can depend on the wallet, an unnamed service provider, a local payment system, and the underlying blockchain all working at once.
Key features in the Antarctic Wallet
Is Antarctic Wallet Any Different?
Antarctic describes the service as a direct crypto payment. There are no P2P transfers, and only direct QR payments. After a user scans a QR code, a request goes to a verified counterparty, that counterparty pays the fiat invoice, and Antarctic deducts crypto from the user.
The company calls this P2C and defines service providers as third parties that make fiat payments to sellers in exchange for a user’s digital currency. For a virtual card, a partner bank issues the card and the merchant again receives fiat.
Antarctic provides the interface and technical connection; it does not issue the card.
This structure is why Antarctic can work with QR systems that were never designed for crypto. The customer gets a familiar checkout while the merchant continues to receive fiat through its normal payment rail.
Note: Antarctic does not make a merchant accept crypto. It coordinates a crypto sale and a third-party fiat payment behind an ordinary merchant QR code. That distinction matters for fees, failures, disputes, and regulatory responsibility.
Why the Model Fits its First Markets
Antarctic says the service is available across a CIS grouping, Vietnam, and Thailand, with 12 more markets planned. The choice of Southeast Asia is logical because users and merchants are already trained to scan. Bank of Thailand data recorded 2.53 billion PromptPay transactions worth THB 4.66 trillion in May 2026.
In Vietnam, official figures show QR transaction volume rose 61.63% and value 150.67% in the first nine months of 2025.
Vietnam’s regulatory direction is tightening, though: Reuters reported in March 2026 that authorities were preparing locally licensed exchanges and rules that would prohibit nationals from trading on overseas platforms. Digital assets are not recognized as money or legal tender there.
Our card has already been used in 77 countries 🌏
From Turkey, the UAE to Japan, the Maldives, South Africa, and Paraguay – our card is accepted for: ➖ cafes and restaurants ➖ clothing and souvenir shops ➖ duty-free shops ➖ hotels, booking services, and transportation pic.twitter.com/mLUuuhODMU
The wallet supports USDT and TON over TON and TRC20, with access through the web, mobile apps, and a Telegram Mini App. Its wider menu includes card top-ups and withdrawals, virtual cards, AliPay, Steam and mobile top-ups, mass transfers, AML checks, and a referral program.
There are positive controls on paper. Antarctic requires KYC, names Sumsub as its verification provider, screens deposits and withdrawals under its AML policy, and offers passcode and two-factor protections.
There are visible signs of usage. Google Play showed more than 50,000 downloads at review time. Telegram displayed roughly 148,000 monthly users. The Apple App Store showed a 4.6 rating, but from only 10 ratings.
BeInCrypto confirmed that the public web onboarding loaded and offered email and Telegram sign-in. It did not complete account creation, KYC, or a funded payment.
Google Play Store Shows 50k+ Downloads for Antarctic Wallet
The five-second figure, live exchange rate, checkout fee, and end-to-end settlement therefore remain company-reported rather than independently reproduced in this review.
Custody is the Biggest Trade-Off
Antarctic’s company page says users control their assets and that the company has no access to their funds. The terms say the opposite in an operational sense. They describe an omnibus wallet controlled by Antarctic and state that the company manages and retains control of private keys to transact on a user’s instructions.
For risk assessment, the terms should prevail. Users own a contractual balance, but Antarctic controls the keys and can suspend access, freeze assets, reject deposits, or request enhanced due diligence.
A Telegram-only account carries an additional warning: the terms say deleting the linked Telegram account can cause irreversible loss of access if no email was attached.
Who the Antarctic Wallet is Best For — and Who It Is Not
BEST SUITED TO
NOT IDEAL FOR
Stablecoin holders making small, routine purchases through local QR rails
Anyone storing savings or keeping a large balance
Users in supported markets who already pay merchants by bank QR code
Users who require self-custody and direct control of private keys
Users comfortable with KYC and a custodial spending account
Privacy-sensitive users or anyone who needs audited reserves and clearer local authorization
The Verdict: Useful Spending Wallet, Lacks Maturity
Antarctic Wallet addresses a real gap. Many crypto users can hold USDT more easily than they can spend it, while merchants have little reason to add a crypto checkout. Antarctic connects those worlds through payment behavior that already exists. That is a more practical proposition than asking every café, shop, or online seller to adopt a new rail.
For small, routine purchases in a supported market, the convenience may justify the KYC, custody, and partner risk. The interface is accessible across web, mobile, and Telegram; the asset and network choices are focused; and the official Kyrgyz license is verifiable.
The wallet is harder to recommend for savings, large balances, or users who expect self-custody.
Antarctic needs to reconcile its custody language, name or clearly classify settlement and card partners, publish a fee schedule and service-level data, align its privacy labels, and release a credible security audit. It should also distinguish a Kyrgyz VASP license from authorization or partnership arrangements in each market where it operates.
Bottom Line: Interested users should consider Antarctic Wallet like a funded spending account: keep only what you expect to spend, verify the rate and fee before each transaction, attach an email recovery method, and withdraw surplus funds. The product’s idea is stronger than its present disclosure layer.
Antarctic Wallet FAQ
Is Antarctic Wallet self-custodial?
No. Antarctic’s terms define custodial wallet services and say the company controls the private keys and omnibus wallet infrastructure. Users instruct transactions but do not hold the keys themselves.
Which assets and networks does Antarctic Wallet support?
The public FAQ lists USDT and TON, using the TON and TRC20 networks. Supported assets, limits, and services can vary by jurisdiction, so users should confirm the current in-app route before sending funds.
How fast are Antarctic QR payments?
Antarctic advertises a five-second average, while its FAQ says a payment takes about eight seconds. BeInCrypto did not execute a funded payment, and the company has not published an independently audited latency or success-rate report.
Is Antarctic Wallet licensed?
Yes, Antarctic Wallet LLC holds an active license as a virtual-asset exchange operator in the Kyrgyz Republic. The official registry limits the license territory to Kyrgyzstan. That should not be read as proof of local authorization in every market the product serves; availability and legal treatment depend on local rules and partner arrangements.
Strategy is buying Bitcoin (BTC) again, but according to President and CEO Phong Le, the decision has little to do with where Bitcoin’s price sits.
Le said the math behind Strategy’s renewed purchases comes down to cost of capital, not market timing.
Why Bitcoin Buying Comes Down to Capital Costs
Strategy’s resumed Bitcoin purchases followed a 10-week pause spent shoring up its balance sheet. Le compared the underlying calculation to financing a data center buildout.
Land and energy costs have climbed, he said, even as the cost of raising capital stayed low.
“We don’t really make decisions on Bitcoin specific to Bitcoin price.”
I joined Bloomberg @crypto to discuss Strategy’s return to buying Bitcoin, building a fortress balance sheet, MSCI’s index proposal, and equity market demand for Bitcoin. $MSTR
00:24 – Back to buying bitcoin:native and why the decision was not price-driven 00:43 – Fortress… pic.twitter.com/YoO8U5FIvf
He said the trade only works when selling shares or debt costs less than Bitcoin’s expected return. Strategy ranked fourth among public companies for equity capital raised this year, behind only SpaceX, Google, and Intel, Le said.
Why Strategy Still Sells, Occasionally
Le rejected the idea that Strategy only accumulates Bitcoin, calling it a “two way strategy” instead. Earlier this year, the company sold about 7,000 BTC, under 1% of holdings, to fund dividends and buybacks.
He said debt holders and ratings agencies expect a company willing to sell assets when needed. A firm that never sells, he argued, is not a “fully operating” company.
Betting on a Sustained Bull Market
Le’s comments suggest he expects Bitcoin’s rally to continue well beyond current levels. He said Strategy would keep buying at $80,000, $90,000, or $100,000, and even at a $130,000 all-time high, arguing today’s purchases would look justified if Bitcoin later climbs to $260,000.
“I don’t foresee us holding Bitcoin as we enter into what I consider a heavy bull market.”
Phong Le, President and CEO, Strategy
That conviction also sits behind Strategy’s fight against an MSCI index removal proposal. MSCI is an index provider whose benchmarks guide passive fund flows.
The proposal would exclude companies with large Bitcoin treasuries, and Le has called it discriminatory.
He argues Bitcoin functions as an operating asset on Strategy’s balance sheet, not a passive holding. That distinction could decide whether Strategy stays in MSCI’s indexes when a ruling arrives October 16.
Wall Street logged its third consecutive losing session Tuesday. Fresh U.S. strikes on Iran sent oil surging, and CNBC’s Jim Cramer says three forces now keep the market, including Bitcoin, volatile.
The Dow fell 419 points and the Nasdaq dropped 1%. Both slides reflect geopolitical shocks, bond market stress, and a hawkish new Fed chair. The 10-year Treasury yield climbed to 4.79%.
Three Forces Rattling Wall Street
The first of the three factors is Iran. Renewed U.S. strikes near the Strait of Hormuz pushed Brent crude up 4.6% to $95.70 a barrel Tuesday evening. U.S. crude closed above $90 for the first time in over a month.
The second factor is the Federal Reserve. Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh has signaled he would raise rates even at the cost of a recession.
Cramer compares him to former Fed Chair Paul Volcker, another inflation hawk. Traders now put the odds of a September rate hike at 66%, up from about 40% a week earlier.
The third is the president himself. Cramer estimates a provocative post on Iran shaves about a quarter point off major indexes. An actual strike can cut markets by half a percent and add two percentage points to oil. He calls it a volatility premium with no fixed expiration.
Cramer’s team also trimmed data center exposure ahead of the November election, wary of political risk to AI names. They kept core holdings in Nvidia and Apple.
Bitcoin has slipped below $77,000 briefly. Image Source: BeInCrypto
Investors trimmed exposure across both stocks and crypto. Ether slid alongside bitcoin as traders cut risk broadly across the sector. Cramer’s investing club raised cash to more than 15%, the highest level in its 25-year history.
He is betting the whipsaw continues until Iran’s conflict eases or the Fed’s path becomes clearer. The next test arrives Friday, when the August jobs report could reshape rate-hike expectations further.
The anonymous leaker behind CyberLeek has reportedly pocketed roughly $350,000, according to on-chain analyst Conor Grogan. The funds allegedly came entirely from liquidity fees rather than direct sales.
The withdrawal coincided with a sharp price decline for the CYBERLEEK meme coin.
The Mastermind Strategy Behind CyberLeek
Grogan stated on September 1 that the person behind CyberLeek withdrew the funds through various OTC providers, a route that converts digital assets into conventional money without requiring large open-market token sales.
That structure differs meaningfully from a typical launch-and-dump scheme. Rather than offloading large CYBERLEEK holdings directly, the wallet tied to the project reportedly profited by collecting fees whenever other traders transacted in its liquidity pool.
The GTA 6 hacker, responsible for the Cyberleek coin, has cashed out about $350k, entirely from LP fees. They have washed funds through a variety of OTC providers
This mechanism depends entirely on sustained trading activity. The viral GTA VI leaks appeared to provide exactly that fuel, drawing in buyers and speculators with each new clip, even as rising volume exposed participants to greater volatility and potential losses.
CyberLeek Launch Timeline
Blockchain researchers traced the CYBERLEEK token’s launch to August 15. The Solana-based asset accompanied each new leak as part of a broader campaign, though the identity behind the controlling wallets remains publicly unconfirmed.
Rockstar Games acknowledged the leaks on August 26, calling the situation heartbreaking, but did not publicly name CyberLeek or draw a definitive conclusion about the leaks’ origin. The studio has since filed federal subpoenas targeting Microsoft and Discord to further the case.
As of the latest reading, CYBERLEEK traded near $0.002959, down 25.6% over 24 hours, according to CoinGecko data, with a market cap of $2.17 million and 24-hour trading volume of $2.69 million.
The token’s price has swung sharply in a single day, ranging from $0.0024 to $0.0041. It now trades roughly 91% below its all-time high, reached on August 23.
