Menu

Binance

Binance closes Ukrainian hryvnia trading pair and fiat gateway on September 28.

Binance closes Ukrainian hryvnia trading pair and fiat gateway on September 28.

, , , , , ,

Binance is cutting off a key link between Ukraine’s currency and its exchange just as the platform faces mounting regulatory pressure in Europe and a fresh sanctions probe in the United States. The delisting, first detailed by CryptoPotato, will hit one of Binance’s largest user bases at a sensitive moment for the exchange.

  • Binance will close UAH deposits and withdrawals via Fiat Trade UAH after Monday, September 28.
  • The USDT/UAH spot trading pair will be delisted the same day, with open orders automatically removed.
  • Remaining UAH balances convert automatically to USDT by Wednesday, September 30, requiring no user action.
  • Sep 28 deadline to close UAH deposits, withdrawals and the trading pair
  • Sep 30 date Binance auto-converts leftover UAH balances into USDT
  • $4.3B penalty Binance paid in 2023 over US money-laundering and sanctions violations
  • $50M fine paid by former CEO Changpeng Zhao alongside a four-month sentence

Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange by trading volume, announced it will shut down the Fiat Trade UAH gateway and delist the USDT/UAH spot pair after Monday, September 28, according to a company announcement. UAH is the ticker for the Ukrainian hryvnia. Any UAH balances users have not moved out will be converted automatically into USDT by Wednesday, September 30.

Ukrainian traders lose a direct fiat on-ramp

Binance’s notice instructed users to settle their positions ahead of the cutoff. “All open orders on the USDT/UAH Spot trading pair will be automatically removed after trading ceases. Users are advised to manage their UAH balances and open orders before the above deadlines,” the exchange said in its announcement.

The change removes one of the few direct channels linking Ukraine’s domestic banking system to crypto markets through Binance. Ukraine has been one of Binance’s strongest markets, with millions of users on the platform, and the exchange launched a dedicated WhatsApp channel for Ukrainian users earlier this year as part of a broader push into seven of its top markets. Losing the fiat gateway is likely to push some hryvnia-holding users toward alternative on- and off-ramps.

Greece rejected Binance’s MiCA license amid ECB pressure

The Ukraine delisting lands as Binance works through separate regulatory setbacks across the European Union. The bloc’s Markets in Crypto-Assets framework, known as MiCA, took full effect on July 1, requiring exchanges to hold a license in an EU member state to keep serving local customers. Binance applied through Greece but was rejected, and users across the bloc have since reported service disruptions.

The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month that European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde personally asked Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis to block Binance’s license bid. The paper cited Binance’s 2023 guilty plea and concerns that admitting the exchange could push more users toward dollar-backed stablecoins while the ECB pursues its digital euro project.

A new US sanctions probe follows the 2023 settlement

Binance is also facing a fresh US investigation into whether it enabled trading tied to Iran, according to Bloomberg. That case echoes the exchange’s 2023 settlement, when it pleaded guilty and agreed to pay $4.3 billion to resolve US anti-money-laundering, sanctions and money-transmission violations, a sum far larger than typical crypto enforcement penalties of that era.

Former CEO Changpeng Zhao served four months in prison and paid a $50 million fine as part of that resolution. Donald Trump later granted Zhao a presidential pardon.

The BlockWest read. For Binance, the Ukraine wind-down looks less like a compliance footnote and more like a signal that the exchange is quietly de-risking fiat rails in jurisdictions with volatile currencies while its legal exposure in Brussels and Washington grows. Ukrainian users losing a bank-linked on-ramp will likely lean harder on stablecoins and peer-to-peer channels, the same dollar-denominated flows the ECB says it wants to limit.

Binance has not said whether it will pursue a renewed MiCA license application in another EU member state after Greece’s rejection, and the outcome of the US sanctions inquiry into alleged Iran-linked trading remains pending.

Ethena backs USDe stablecoin with Binance tokenized stocks

Ethena backs USDe stablecoin with Binance tokenized stocks

, , , , , ,

Ethena has started backing its $4.9 billion USDe stablecoin with tokenized Binance stock positions, extending the same funding-rate arbitrage it has run on Bitcoin, Ether and Solana into equity markets for the first time. The expansion, which Ethena says could eventually dwarf the $15 billion crypto perpetuals opportunity it captured last cycle, comes as USDe’s supply sits well below its October 2025 peak.

  • Ethena began backing USDe with Binance’s tokenized bStocks on Friday (September 25, 2026), per its own announcement.
  • Binance’s equity basis trade has averaged roughly 11% annualized over the past six months, according to Ethena.
  • Seventeen of Binance’s 67 pairs qualified for the strategy, including Nvidia, Tesla and SpaceX.
  • $4.9B USDe’s current supply, the base being extended into equities
  • 11% Binance equity basis trade’s six-month annualized average return
  • $14.8B USDe’s peak supply on October 4, 2025, versus today’s total
  • $250B July equity perpetual volume, of which Binance handled 76%

Ethena, the decentralized finance protocol behind USDe, said it began backing the synthetic dollar with Binance’s tokenized stocks on Friday (September 25, 2026), according to CryptoPotato. The move applies the delta-neutral basis trade that has underpinned USDe since launch, and that Ethena already runs on Bitcoin, Ether and Solana, to equities for the first time.

Binance’s equity basis trade has averaged 11% annualized

The mechanics mirror Ethena’s crypto strategy. The protocol buys a bStock, a token issued by Binance affiliate BTech Holdings Limited and backed one-for-one by custodied shares, then shorts the matching equity perpetual to collect the funding that leveraged longs pay.

Ethena said Binance’s equity basis has averaged about 11% annualized over the past six months. The exchange also gives eligible delta-neutral accounts, including Ethena’s, lower priority in auto-deleveraging, reducing the odds its hedge gets forcibly unwound.

Ethena announced the partnership in a post on X, calling Binance its first venue for extending the basis trade into equity perpetuals. “We expect the market opportunity size for equity perpetuals to far exceed the $15b+ of crypto perpetuals captured by Ethena last cycle,” the company wrote, framing the shift as one of the most significant additions to USDe’s collateral mix since launch.

Seventeen of Binance’s 67 stock pairs cleared Kairos Research’s bar

The allocation follows a framework Kairos Research wrote for the Ethena Risk Committee. To qualify, a name needs $25 million of perpetual open interest over 14 days, 30 days of funding history, and a matching tokenized stock listed on the same venue, among other conditions.

Seventeen of Binance’s 67 pairs passed, Nvidia, Tesla and SpaceX among them, on a venue that holds $2.14 billion of the $2.9 billion measured across four exchanges. Across 37 earnings events studied, the underlying stocks gapped 9.9% on average while Ethena’s hedged position moved just 20.3 basis points, evidence the short leg absorbs most single-name volatility.

The report flagged a caveat: carry on the approved Binance names had already halved over the prior month to about 7%, with two names turning negative. Kairos also made bStock approval conditional on a side letter with the issuer, since holders have no proprietary interest in the underlying custodied shares and every bStock contract sits behind a single upgrade key, a concentrated operational risk in the arrangement, as detailed in Ethena’s post.

Binance handled 76% of $250 billion in equity perpetual volume in July

CryptoQuant data cited in the announcement shows Binance handled 76% of the $250 billion in equity perpetual volume traded in July, well ahead of the other three exchanges in the sample. Binance’s tokenized U.S. equities, launched in June, reached $100 million in assets within two weeks, indicating fast early uptake on the exchange side of the trade.

ENA traded at $0.24 on Friday, up 12% in 24 hours, according to CoinGecko. USDe’s supply, at $4.9 billion, remains well below the $14.8 billion peak it hit on October 4, 2025, per DefiLlama.

Ethena last widened USDe’s collateral base this way in April 2024, when it added Bitcoin backing with supply at roughly $2 billion, a fraction of today’s $4.9 billion base.

The BlockWest read. For USDe holders and allocators, this trade is a bet that equity funding rates diversify collateral risk away from crypto perpetuals, not that returns are guaranteed. Kairos’s own numbers show approved-name carry halved in a month to about 7%, and the single upgrade key behind every bStock concentrates custody risk in one Binance-linked contract. Anyone treating USDe’s yield as passive income should read that fine print before the next collateral push.

Ethena has not said whether it plans to add equity perpetuals from other exchanges beyond Binance, or how it will respond if approved-name carry keeps compressing below the roughly 7% level Kairos flagged last month. The next test will be whether Binance’s tokenized stock lineup grows past its current 17 qualifying pairs as more names clear the $25 million open-interest threshold.

Anthropic releases Claude Opus 5.5 with tighter safeguards against containment escape

Circle sells $100 million in stock to Binance in expanded USDC deal

, , ,

Circle Internet Group disclosed in an 8-K filing that its subsidiaries signed new commercial arrangements with Binance on September 17, 2026, expanding a partnership to promote USDC through Circle’s Modular Smart Contract Wallet infrastructure service. Concurrently, Circle sold Binance $100 million of Class A common stock in a private placement, with the shares locked up for up to two years.

  • New five-year commercial arrangement supersedes prior deals from November 2024 and August 2025
  • Circle issued 1,237,011 shares to Binance at $80.84 per share, a discount to market price
  • Watch for how Circle discloses the incentive fee percentage and termination triggers in future filings
  • $100M aggregate proceeds from Binance stock sale
  • $80.84 per-share price, below market at closing
  • 5 yrs term of new USDC promotion arrangement
  • 2 yrs maximum lock-up on Binance’s shares

Circle Internet Group filed an 8-K on September 22, 2026, Tuesday, disclosing that certain subsidiaries entered arrangements with Binance on September 17, 2026 that “expand the parties’ existing strategic partnership relating to the promotion of USDC held through Circle’s Modular Smart Contract Wallet infrastructure service.” The filing states the new pact “supersedes and replaces the agreements the Company previously entered into with Binance in November 2024 and in August 2025.”

Five-Year Fee Arrangement Replaces Two Prior Deals

Under the new terms, Circle will pay Binance a monthly incentive fee tied to a percentage of USDC held through the Modular Smart Contract Wallet service. Binance in turn agreed to undertake unspecified “other activities to promote USDC on its platform.”

The arrangement runs five years, with either party able to terminate early “upon the occurrence of certain specified events.” The filing does not describe what those events are.

$100 Million Placement at a Discount

Circle also entered a Subscription Agreement with Binance on September 17, 2026, issuing 1,237,011 shares of Class A common stock at $80.84 per share for aggregate proceeds of $100 million. The filing says the price reflected “$100 million, reflecting a discount to the market price of the Class A common stock prior to the closing,” without stating what that market price was.

The shares were sold in a private placement exempt from Securities Act registration and closed immediately following execution of both the subscription agreement and the commercial arrangements.

Two-Year Lock-Up, Full Voting Rights

Binance agreed not to sell, transfer, pledge or hedge the shares until the earlier of the second anniversary of closing or a termination of the commercial deal by Binance under specified circumstances. Exceptions apply for transfers among Binance affiliates, tender offers, board-approved business combinations and legally required dispositions.

The filing states Binance retains all of its rights as a stockholder of the Company during that period, including the right to vote the Subscribed Shares.

Binance retains all of its rights as a stockholder of the Company during that period, including the right to vote the Subscribed Shares.

Circle 8-K filing

Analysis: A Repriced Exchange Relationship

The filing replaces two prior Binance agreements within roughly ten months, suggesting Circle is renegotiating stablecoin distribution terms as competition for exchange placement intensifies. Tying a monthly fee to USDC balances on Binance, rather than a flat payment, shifts more of Circle’s cost structure toward variable, volume-linked spending, which matters to allocators modeling Circle’s margins on reserve income.

The equity component gives Binance a locked-in stake with voting rights but no near-term liquidity, a structure that aligns Binance’s incentives with USDC growth without immediate market pressure on CRCL float. For other exchanges evaluating similar stablecoin promotion deals, the $100 million placement at a stated discount sets a visible benchmark for how issuers may now pay for distribution partly in equity rather than cash alone.

The BlockWest read. Circle is effectively paying Binance twice: a recurring fee tied to USDC balances and a discounted equity stake locked up for two years. The filing withholds the fee percentage and the termination triggers, the two variables that will determine whether this deal actually costs Circle more or less than the arrangements it replaces.

Circle has not disclosed the incentive fee rate or the specific termination events in the 8-K; a subsequent filing or the company’s next quarterly disclosure should show whether those terms surface.

Binance Wallet and PancakeSwap launch tokenized pre-IPO exposure through Pre-Access campaigns

Binance Wallet and PancakeSwap launch tokenized pre-IPO exposure through Pre-Access campaigns

, , , , ,

Binance Wallet and PancakeSwap are now offering tokenized exposure to private companies ahead of their IPOs through Pre-Access campaigns, extending the exchange’s move into traditional assets. The offering carries significant restrictions: holders receive no voting rights, dividends, or shareholder protections, and valuations remain uncertain.

  • Binance launched perpetual futures for pre-IPO exposure in May, with SpaceX as the first contract offered to users.
  • The number of tokenized stockholders reached 3.7 million on September 19, up 86 percent over the prior 30 days.
  • Pre-Access allocations depend on Alpha Points, bStocks tier level, and Trencher Badge status, with PancakeSwap setting final rules.
  • 3.7M Tokenized stockholders reached record high on September 19
  • 86% Growth in tokenized stockholders over 30 days through September 19
  • $3B+ Distributed value in tokenized equities reached record level
  • June 1 Date Binance opened US equities trading for all users

According to reporting by BeInCrypto, Binance Wallet and PancakeSwap have jointly launched Pre-Access campaigns that grant users on-chain exposure to unlisted private companies before they go public. The first company to be offered through the program has not yet been disclosed. The initiative caps a year in which Binance has systematically expanded beyond cryptocurrency into traditional financial products, rolling out stock trading, tokenized securities, and derivatives contracts tied to private company valuations.

Binance Expands Pre-IPO Derivatives After Adding Stock Trading

The exchange’s move into pre-IPO exposure began in May when Binance launched perpetual futures for pre-IPO market exposure, starting with SpaceX. That initial contract, SPCXUSDT, gave users leveraged exposure to the private aerospace company ahead of what many observers expected would be a public listing.

Binance broadened its traditional asset offerings in the subsequent months. The exchange launched US stocks trading on June 1 and previewed bStocks tokenized securities on June 12. The expansion reflects wider industry movement: competitors including Robinhood and Kraken have already launched tokenized stock products. Growth in the sector has accelerated sharply. The number of tokenized stockholders reached 3.7 million on September 19 (Saturday), a record, after climbing 86 percent over the prior 30 days.

Distributed value in tokenized equities exceeded $3 billion for the first time, according to RWA.xyz data.

Pre-Access Allocations Tied to Alpha Points and Platform Tier Status

The Pre-Access campaigns operate on an allocation system with three weighted inputs. Holders’ Alpha Points balance increases their allocation size, as does their tier level within the bStocks on-chain system. Users holding a Trencher Badge receive an additional allocation boost. PancakeSwap will set the final rules for the campaign, Binance Wallet disclosed.

Binance Wallet framed the launch around access, saying “Everyday people have never had access to this kind of early-stage exposure.”

The tokenized offerings carry substantial structural limits. Holders receive no voting rights, dividends, or shareholder protections of any kind. Binance warns that the tokens carry high risk, carry no guarantee of returns, liquidity, or settlement, and may not suit all users. Private company valuations remain uncertain and subject to change.

First Campaign Identity Still Undisclosed, Demand Uncertain

Binance Wallet said that the first Pre-Access campaign will be revealed soon but has not yet named the company. That disclosure will serve as an early test of whether tokenized pre-IPO exposure attracts the same level of user interest that the SpaceX perpetuals contract did earlier this year. The reveal will also clarify whether allocations based on Alpha Points and tier status can generate sufficient participation to justify the operational complexity and risk warnings the program requires.

The BlockWest read. Binance’s movement into pre-IPO tokens follows successful perpetual futures adoption but now transfers settlement risk from the exchange to users holding restricted instruments with no corporate rights. Allocators should weigh whether early-stage private company exposure justifies accepting tokens stripped of voting power and shareholder protection.

The name of the first Pre-Access campaign company will be released soon, providing the market with a signal of whether demand for early-stage private equity exposure remains strong or whether it narrows to repeat participants in the perpetual futures market.

Lagarde asked Greece to block Binance’s EU license application

Lagarde asked Greece to block Binance’s EU license application

, , , , , ,

The European Central Bank president’s alleged intervention in Binance’s EU licensing process raises questions about regulatory independence and the limits of unelected officials’ influence over crypto market access. The episode underscores tensions between central bank digital currency ambitions and established crypto platforms seeking legitimacy in Europe.

  • Christine Lagarde personally asked Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis to block Binance’s EU license application.
  • Binance’s application had cleared technical review by early June and the mandatory 40-day assessment period without objections.
  • Lagarde cited Binance’s prior US money laundering plea and concerns that approving the exchange would boost dollar stablecoins over the ECB’s digital euro.
  • 1,500 Binance compliance team members since its 2023 US settlement
  • 27 EU member states covered by a MiCA license approval from any single country

According to a Wall Street Journal report, ECB President Christine Lagarde directly intervened in Binance’s application for a Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) license through Greece’s Hellenic Capital Market Commission (HCMC), asking Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis to reject the exchange’s bid. The move came despite Greek regulators having effectively cleared the application for approval, and raises a fundamental question about the formal authority the ECB president holds over licensing decisions that legally belong to independent national regulators. The story was first reported by CryptoPotato.

The Application Clears Technical Review Before Lagarde’s Intervention

Binance submitted its MiCA application through Greece in pursuit of a license that, once granted by any EU member state, extends automatically across all 27 member states. By early June, the application had completed its technical assessment, the mandatory 40-day objection period had expired without challenge, and the HCMC’s anti-money laundering officer had signed off favorably, according to the Journal’s reporting.

Notifications to other member states were reportedly already in preparation when the process stalled between June 7 and June 15.

Lagarde’s Position Overrides Greece’s Own Finance Ministry Support

An HCMC official subsequently informed Binance that Lagarde opposed the license. The Journal reported that Lagarde had signaled this position directly to Mitsotakis during a May meeting, effectively overriding the support of Greece’s own finance minister. Lagarde cited two rationales: Binance’s 2023 guilty plea to US money laundering and sanctions violations, and her concern that approving the exchange would encourage adoption of dollar-denominated stablecoins at a moment when the ECB was launching its digital euro initiative.

A legal expert characterized the intervention as “political interference” in a licensing process that falls entirely within the jurisdiction of independent national regulators, since the ECB holds no formal authority over MiCA approvals. The episode raised questions about the practical limits of regulatory independence when an unelected central bank leader can influence decisions beyond her stated purview.

Binance Abandons Greece and Pursues France Instead

Reuters broke news of the Greek rejection risk in mid-June. Binance initially disputed the development, noting that the HCMC’s technical review had found its application compliant and highlighting its compliance team, which has grown to roughly 1,500 people since its 2023 settlement with US authorities.

The pushback proved unsuccessful, and Binance withdrew its Greek application in favor of seeking authorization elsewhere.

Regulators in Ireland and Latvia also rejected Binance’s applications, citing the exchange’s historical penalties and organizational complexity. Coinbase secured a MiCA license based in Luxembourg, while Kraken already held EU approval. Binance has pivoted to France, where it holds a smaller registration and is in discussions with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), the country’s financial markets regulator, as its remaining path to a bloc-wide MiCA license covering all member states.

The BlockWest read. Lagarde’s intervention signals that central bank concerns about stablecoin competition are now shaping crypto market access in ways that bypass formal regulatory channels. The ECB’s digital euro agenda is not merely a monetary policy question but a competitive constraint on which platforms can operate in Europe, a shift that allocators should weigh when assessing regulatory risk across jurisdictions.

Binance’s path to an EU-wide MiCA license now depends entirely on France’s AMF, which has not yet signaled approval or rejection of the exchange’s application. The outcome will determine whether Binance can operate across the bloc or remains confined to smaller registrations in individual countries, and whether central bank digital currency ambitions will continue to shape crypto licensing decisions outside formal legal channels.

ECB president Lagarde personally asked Greece to reject Binance’s EU license application

ECB president Lagarde personally asked Greece to reject Binance’s EU license application

, , , , , ,

The ECB president’s personal intervention in a crypto exchange’s EU licensing bid reveals how central bank leadership can shape digital asset regulation outside formal authority channels. For market participants seeking European footholds, the episode underscores the political and compliance risks that extend beyond statutory frameworks.

  • ECB President Christine Lagarde personally asked Greek PM Kyriakos Mitsotakis to reject Binance’s EU crypto license application, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal.
  • Lagarde cited Binance’s prior guilty plea to US money-laundering and sanctions violations, and concerns that dollar stablecoin adoption would undermine the ECB’s digital euro project.
  • Binance withdrew its application in mid-June before Greece’s securities regulator could render a formal decision, and halted EU marketing after missing the July deadline.
  • June Month when Greek authorities signaled intent to approve Binance’s license application to ESMA.
  • Mid-June Timing of Binance’s withdrawal of its EU crypto-asset service provider license bid.

The European Central Bank president directly intervened to block Binance’s entry into Europe, according to reporting by The Wall Street Journal. Lagarde asked Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis to reject the exchange’s application for a crypto-asset service provider license under the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets regulatory framework. An official at Greece’s Hellenic Capital Market Commission later confirmed to Binance that Lagarde opposed the bid, according to people familiar with the discussions cited by the Journal. The story was first reported by BeInCrypto.

Lagarde’s Intervention in a Formal Process Beyond Her Mandate

Binance had applied through Greek regulators for a license that, once granted by any single EU member state, extends across the entire bloc. In early June, Greek authorities informed the European Securities and Markets Authority that they intended to approve the application. The exchange had begun preparing for a formal European launch, including planning an Athens visit by chief executive officer Richard Teng.

The ECB holds no formal authority over exchange licensing decisions under MiCA. National regulators control that power, and approval in one member state automatically covers all others.

Binance’s US Compliance History and Stablecoin Concerns Drove Lagarde’s Opposition

Lagarde’s objections centered on two distinct risks, according to the Journal’s account of her reasoning. First, she viewed Binance’s guilty plea to US money-laundering and sanctions violations as a material compliance red flag that warranted blocking the firm’s European entry.

Her second concern reflected the ECB’s strategic interest in its digital euro project. Lagarde reportedly feared that Binance’s presence in Europe would accelerate adoption of dollar-denominated stablecoins among consumers, undermining demand for the ECB’s own proposed digital currency.

Binance Withdraws and Halts EU Operations After Informal Rejection

Binance withdrew its application in mid-June before the Greek securities regulator could issue a formal decision.

The exchange also ceased marketing its services to EU users after missing a July licensing deadline. BeInCrypto initially reported the rejection in June, when Binance stated it would pursue a license through another EU member state. No such application has been publicly announced in the months since.

The BlockWest read. Lagarde’s intervention illustrates how institutional preferences within the ECB hierarchy can override formal regulatory channels. For institutions seeking EU licensing, the episode suggests that compliance records and alignment with central bank digital currency strategies carry weight in informal pre-approval screening, regardless of who holds formal decision authority.

Whether Binance will reapply through another EU member state remains unresolved. The firm has not publicly committed to pursuing alternative routes, and no other member state has announced a pending Binance application since mid-June.

Binance’s pre-IPO contract values Anthropic at an implied $2.1 trillion

Binance’s pre-IPO contract values Anthropic at an implied $2.1 trillion

, , , , ,

Binance’s pre-IPO perpetual contract for Anthropic reached an implied valuation exceeding $2.1 trillion on September 9, a figure that depends entirely on the exchange’s estimated one-billion-share denominator and the contract’s leverage mechanics. Understanding how this valuation diverges from Anthropic’s last disclosed private financing and what could reset it matters for traders pricing exposure to a major AI company ahead of a planned public offering.

  • Binance contract traded above $2,100 per unit on September 9, implying $2.1 trillion company value using the exchange’s estimated one-billion-share denominator.
  • Anthropic’s most recent disclosed valuation was $965 billion in May 2024, making the current contract price imply roughly a 2.2x premium to that private financing round.
  • The contract’s price and implied valuation remain unanchored to any public share price or official offering terms, making them dependent on derivatives market participants, leverage rules, and Binance’s estimated share count.
  • $2,168 Contract mark price recorded at 14:45 UTC on September 9, per DefiLlama snapshot
  • $26.1M Open interest in the perpetual contract on the same date and time
  • $965B Anthropic’s Series H post-money valuation from May 2024 financing
  • $47B Anthropic’s disclosed run-rate revenue as of May 2024

The September 9 Price Action And Market Snapshot

On September 9, traders were actively pricing exposure to Anthropic on Binance’s ANTHROPICUSDT perpetual contract, with the mark trading above $2,100 per unit. Using Binance’s estimated denominator of one billion shares, that price produces an implied enterprise value exceeding $2.1 trillion. A DefiLlama snapshot captured at 14:45 UTC that day recorded the contract at $2,168.26, with $26.1 million in open interest and $24.76 million in 24-hour volume. A separate ByKaranteli reading showed the mark at $2,122.74, open interest up 6.1% over the previous 24 hours, and approximately $243,000 in liquidations over that span.

The contract’s trading activity reflects genuine capital commitment and risk-taking by derivatives traders, yet the scale of both volume and open interest remains modest relative to major cryptocurrency perpetuals. This liquidity constraint is important because it means large trades can move the price more substantially than would occur in a deeper market, and the price discovery process itself depends heavily on the specific participants active at any moment.

How A Perpetual Contract Generates A Trillion-Dollar Valuation

The $2.1 trillion figure emerges from a specific calculation: the contract’s per-unit price multiplied by Binance’s assumed total share count. That share count, however, is an estimate published by the exchange, not a confirmed figure from Anthropic’s corporate filings. Binance Research noted that the contract briefly produced an implied value near $2 trillion in August and closed that month at approximately $1.9 trillion, already positioning the contract at roughly double Anthropic’s Series H valuation of $965 billion from May. At the $2.1 trillion level reached in early September, the valuation is around 30 times Anthropic’s disclosed run-rate revenue of $47 billion.

This structure reveals a critical distinction: one side of the equation is a continuously traded derivative quote shaped by real leverage, collateral rules, and market participants, while the other is Anthropic’s privately negotiated May financing valuation. Binance’s contract announcement specifies an estimated one billion shares and explicitly warns that the actual total may differ and that the exchange does not endorse the resulting implied value. The derivatives market price is genuine and reflects traders willing to commit real capital at those levels, but the valuation multiple it produces depends entirely on an unverified share-count assumption.

Pre-IPO derivatives markets for private companies have grown as institutional and retail traders seek exposure to high-profile ventures before they reach public markets. Exchanges including Binance, Coinbase, and OKX have launched perpetuals for companies like OpenAI and Stripe ahead of expected public offerings. However, these markets function without the price anchors that traditional equity markets rely on, creating both opportunity and risk for participants.

Leverage, Liquidations, And The Absence Of An Underlying Index

Binance permits up to 20x leverage on ANTHROPICUSDT, with funding intervals every eight hours at +0.005% per period. Adverse price moves or unmet margin calls can trigger liquidations, and the September 9 snapshots showed both positions being opened and collateral being force-closed. Leverage allows traders to control positions larger than their committed capital, turning price moves into forced transactions when margin cushions erode. The $243,000 in liquidations recorded on that date demonstrates measurable forced selling, though the data does not establish whether those liquidations drove the price or simply followed it.

The contract lacks a stable external reference point because Anthropic has no publicly traded shares.

Binance’s price-discovery mechanism uses a 10-second average of transactions, reaches further back when trading is sparse, and limits the mark’s 1% per-second movement. This is price discovery shaped by Binance’s own market structure, not by an equity index. Coinbase’s documented explanation of pre-IPO perpetuals notes that private-share liquidity is fragmented, physical shorting is difficult, and a pre-IPO contract can diverge substantially from private-market quotes or indicative IPO pricing, particularly when trading is thin. Without a public share price pulling the contract mark back toward a redeemable underlying asset, the valuation remains a product of leverage and market participants rather than an anchor to company fundamentals.

For investors accustomed to traditional equity markets, this represents an unfamiliar dynamic. Traditional stocks converge toward intrinsic value through arbitrage and rebalancing, but pre-IPO perpetuals have none of those stabilizing forces. Price can persist at levels that seem extreme relative to private-market transactions or analyst estimates, and conversely can swing sharply when major positions are unwound or forced liquidated.

What An IPO And A Revised Share Count Could Change

Anthropic disclosed on June 1 that it had confidentially submitted a draft Form S-1 to the Securities and Exchange Commission, though the number of shares to be offered and the offer price remain unset. Reports from September 4 indicated that marketing was expected to begin in mid-October at the earliest and that a public prospectus was expected in late September, though that timeline remained subject to change and Anthropic declined further comment.

A change to the share-count denominator can reset the contract’s screen price mechanically without necessarily altering the economic value of a position. OKX announced that it would rescale its own ANTHROPICUSDT contract from one billion to 10 billion shares, calling the adjustment value-neutral and unrelated to Anthropic’s actual share count. Binance has documented that it may rescale both mark price and position quantity when a revised denominator becomes available, aiming to preserve notional value. A trader who treats the perpetual quote as a stable share price could misread such a technical change as an economic loss or gain.

The larger reset will arrive through official IPO filings and an observable market price. Public disclosures of the capital structure, a marketed price range, and eventually a listed share price will provide external anchors that the current derivatives market lacks. Binance states it may transition ANTHROPICUSDT to a standard TradFi perpetual once a stable third-party index becomes available, with the mark gradually converging to that reference after notice.

Traders are currently pricing Anthropic at extraordinary levels using real leverage and capital, yet the $2.1 trillion implied valuation remains a product of Binance’s own market mechanics and an estimated share count. The path forward depends on Anthropic’s actual IPO timing and disclosed terms: when a public prospectus appears and an official share count is released, Binance’s share denominator is likely to adjust, the contract’s per-unit price will rescale, and the perpetual’s price will eventually anchor to the public market’s reference price rather than to derivatives trading alone.

Binance expands traditional finance strategy by launching physically settled options across more than 1,000 American stocks

Binance expands traditional finance strategy by launching physically settled options across more than 1,000 American stocks

, , , , ,

Binance is integrating physically settled options on over 1,000 US equities and ETFs into its unified trading account, extending its traditional finance expansion beyond crypto and tokenized stocks. The move relies on third-party infrastructure from Nest Trading and Alpaca Securities while keeping Binance as the customer-facing platform for non-US eligible users.

  • Binance launches physically settled options on more than 1,000 US stocks and ETFs for eligible non-US users.
  • Nest Trading Limited acts as introducing broker, routing orders to Alpaca Securities for execution and custody.
  • Users must submit exercise instructions by 30 minutes before expiry or face auto-liquidation of in-the-money positions.
  • $342.9B Equity-linked perpetuals volume in August, up 800-fold from January
  • 79% Share of Binance TradFi perpetual activity from equity-linked products
  • 1,000+ US equities and ETFs now available via physically settled options
  • Sept. 1 Date Binance announced the physically settled options product launch

Binance announced on September 1 that it would offer physically settled options on more than 1,000 selected US stocks and exchange-traded funds, accessible through the same account that already houses cryptocurrency, direct equity holdings, and tokenized securities. The product is available only to eligible users outside the United States. Rather than building the infrastructure itself, Binance has structured the offering through Nest Trading Limited, which acts as an introducing broker, and Alpaca Securities LLC, which handles execution, clearing, settlement, and custody of any shares delivered upon exercise.

The expansion into traditional equity options represents Binance’s latest step in diversifying beyond its cryptocurrency core into regulated financial products. Since launching equity perpetuals in early 2024, the exchange has built significant momentum in traditional finance offerings, with equity-linked derivatives alone generating nearly 80 percent of the exchange’s total derivatives volume by mid-year. Options trading extends this reach into one of the most widely used risk management and speculation tools in global capital markets.

Three-Tier Infrastructure Separates Customer Access From Regulated Operations

The arrangement divides responsibilities across three entities. Binance serves as the customer-facing platform where users place orders, Nest Trading introduces those orders to Alpaca, and Alpaca executes and settles the trades while holding any delivered shares on the user’s behalf. This structure allows Binance to consolidate multiple asset classes within a single interface without becoming the entity responsible for securities clearing or custody.

Nest Trading’s Abu Dhabi Global Market register entry lists the firm as active under financial services permission 260000, with permitted activities including arranging deals, dealing as an agent, and arranging custody. However, the register explicitly states that Nest cannot hold or control client money. Alpaca Securities holds SEC and FINRA approval, with its BrokerCheck profile confirming it conducts options activity, securities clearing and settlement, and electronic trading, and can hold or maintain customer funds and securities.

This multi-entity model reflects a broader industry trend in which offshore cryptocurrency exchanges partner with regulated US securities firms to access traditional market infrastructure without obtaining US broker-dealer licenses themselves. The arrangement provides users with the convenience of a single integrated account while ensuring compliance with US securities regulations through licensed intermediaries. Alpaca has increasingly positioned itself as a technology partner to platforms seeking to offer US equities and options to international customers.

Physical Settlement and Exercise Mechanics Require Active User Instruction

Unlike standard equity positions, options contracts require explicit action before expiry. Exercising a call option results in delivery of the underlying shares, while exercising a put requires the holder to deliver them. Users must submit an exercise instruction through Binance’s platform no later than 30 minutes before the option expires.

In-the-money positions that receive no exercise instruction face automatic liquidation before market close; if the position cannot be sold, it may expire worthless and the premium is lost entirely.

Binance states that eligible retail users may buy calls and puts, with maximum potential loss limited to the premium paid. The exchange notes that option-writing strategies are subject to additional review and do not carry the same defined-loss guarantee. Alpaca requires all customer accounts to be approved before the first options trade, with applicants supplying financial circumstances, experience, risk tolerance, investment objectives, and a signed options agreement.

These approval and instruction requirements reflect regulatory safeguards designed to protect retail investors from the risks inherent in options trading. Options can be more complex and volatile than underlying equities, and regulators impose suitability requirements and disclosure standards to ensure that investors understand what they are purchasing.

Four Distinct Equity Products Now Coexist in a Single Binance Account

The options launch adds a fourth route to equity exposure within Binance’s platform. Direct US stocks give users ownership held through a US-regulated clearing broker. bStocks, which Binance previewed in June, are tokenized securities that do not confer direct ownership of underlying company shares. Equity-linked perpetuals provide derivative exposure without delivery of the underlying share. The new stock options grant a contractual right to buy or sell, with underlying shares delivered or received upon exercise and held by Alpaca.

Equity-linked perpetuals generated approximately $342.9 billion in volume during August, representing about 79 percent of Binance’s total TradFi perpetual activity, and grew more than 800-fold from January.

Shunyet Jan, Binance’s head of exchange and trading, described stock options as an “important next step” toward building a “fuller multi-asset platform.” The consolidated account experience creates convenience for users, but also requires them to understand which firm holds each asset, which regulatory rules apply, and what action is required before expiry or settlement.

The proliferation of equity product types reflects Binance’s strategy of capturing different user preferences and trading styles within a single ecosystem. Some users may prefer direct ownership, others may favor tokenized representations or leveraged derivatives, and still others may seek the hedging or income-generation strategies that options enable. By offering multiple routes to the same underlying assets, Binance increases the likelihood that any given user will find a product matching their risk appetite and strategy.

The launch demonstrates Binance’s strategy of centralizing product discovery and user experience while delegating operational responsibility for securities execution, clearing, and custody to regulated third parties. The practical success of the offering will depend on whether users can distinguish between Binance’s role as platform and Alpaca’s role as custodian, and whether demand for physically settled equity options justifies the infrastructure complexity compared to the exchange’s existing 800-fold growth in perpetuals during 2024. As regulatory scrutiny of cryptocurrency exchanges intensifies globally, Binance’s reliance on licensed intermediaries may also insulate the platform from direct liability for securities operations while testing the limits of how far offshore exchanges can distribute regulated products.

Back To Top
© BlockWest 2026
BlockWest Media LLC

Equities, AI, and blue-chip crypto, covered as one connected market.

Sections

Company

Legal

Follow

𝕏 ▶ in

© 2026 BlockWest. All rights reserved.