SEC sues four entities over alleged $15 million WhatsApp crypto fraud

The Securities and Exchange Commission filed two civil fraud complaints in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against four entities it says ran online confidence scams that took at least $15 million from retail investors. The agency alleges the schemes used WhatsApp groups, fabricated AI trading tools and falsified SEC filings to convince victims their money was safe.

• Cryptoaiml Ltd. and Cryptoaiml Capital Foundation allegedly misappropriated more than $12.5 million from August 2024 through March 2025
• TSAI Pro Ltd. and TSAI Capital Foundation allegedly misappropriated more than $2.8 million from September 2024 to March 2025
• Forms D that both entities filed with the SEC have been removed from the agency’s website

• $15M+ total alleged losses across both complaints
• $12.5M alleged misappropriation in the Cryptoaiml complaint
• $2.8M alleged misappropriation in the TSAI complaint
• 2 separate SDNY complaints

The SEC announced the charges in a press release stating the entities are “likely operated by individuals located overseas” and describing the victims as “hundreds of retail investors, including many in the U.S.” Both complaints remain contested civil actions; the release does not state that any defendant has settled, appeared, or admitted the allegations.

Fabricated signals and a falsified Form D

The SEC’s complaint against Cryptoaiml alleges the entities formed WhatsApp group chats, impersonated investment professionals, and issued fake AI-generated trading “signals” to steer victims onto a trading platform where no actual trading occurred. The agency says the defendants posted “a screenshot on their website of a falsified Form D filed by Cryptoaiml Ltd. with the SEC” to lend the operation false regulatory credibility.

When investors tried to withdraw funds, the complaint alleges, “investors who attempted to withdraw funds were told that their accounts were frozen until they paid fraudulent advance fees.” The SEC also alleges some victims were induced to sign investment management agreements they were told were legitimate.

A second scheme built around rented AI bots

In the TSAI complaint, the SEC alleges the entities marketed a program that let investors “rent” AI-programmed trading bots through a website, WhatsApp chats and a public Facebook page, promising guaranteed profits. Investors were also allegedly told they could earn money by recruiting other investors into the bot program, a structure the complaint frames as part of the fraud rather than a legitimate referral incentive.

TSAI allegedly posted a “phony certificate from the agency on their website that referenced a falsified Form D filed by TSAI Pro Ltd.” The SEC states flatly that “the entire AI-trading bot program was a fraud: there were no AI trading bots and deposited funds never were used to earn returns for investors.”

“Although the methods used to bilk innocent investors in these fraudulent investment scams varied, the goal was the same – promise potential investors outsized returns, claim that they were legitimate entities regulated by the SEC, and then steal their money.”

David Woodcock, Director, SEC Division of Enforcement

What the release leaves unanswered

The SEC’s announcement does not name any individual defendants, only the corporate and foundation entities, despite stating the operations are likely run by people overseas. It also does not disclose what relief the SEC is seeking, whether any assets have been frozen, or whether any parallel criminal referral has been made, leaving open how much of the alleged $15 million investors might ever recover.

The BlockWest read. Falsified Form D filings and doctored SEC certificates are becoming a standard prop in offshore crypto confidence scams, and the fact that both fraudulent Form D references were pulled from EDGAR only after the SEC acted shows the filing system remains reactive rather than preventive. For allocators and compliance desks, the case is another reminder that a Form D number alone confirms nothing about legitimacy.

The BlockWest read. With defendants named only as offshore entities and no individuals identified, allocators should expect any recovery to hinge on frozen assets that may not exist, and banks processing WhatsApp-sourced deposits face fresh pressure to flag rented-bot and signal-group referral structures as fraud indicators rather than novel fintech products. Regulators may also face calls to verify Form D filings before publication, not just remove them after victims have already relied on the false credibility they lent these schemes.

Both cases proceed as contested litigation in the Southern District of New York, and the SEC has not indicated a hearing date or disclosed whether the underlying individuals behind Cryptoaiml and TSAI have been identified or located.

BlockWest is a news publication. Nothing here is investment advice. Read our disclaimer and editorial policy.