CFTC sues Louisiana to block state court order shutting down derivatives firms

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed suit against the state of Louisiana today, seeking to stop the state from barring CFTC-regulated exchanges and clearinghouses from offering event contracts. The filing came one day after a Louisiana state court order shut down more than 30 companies tied to CFTC-regulated derivatives trading without giving them notice or a hearing.

• Louisiana state court order issued Thursday shut down over 30 firms with no notice or opportunity to be heard.
• Louisiana is the 12th state the CFTC has sued to defend federal jurisdiction over derivatives markets.
• Watch for how fast a federal court acts on the CFTC’s request to preserve the status quo.

• 12 state sued by CFTC over derivatives jurisdiction disputes
• 30+ companies shut down by Louisiana’s state court order
• 4 federal Courts of Appeal where CFTC has filed amicus briefs
• 1 state Supreme Court where CFTC has filed an amicus brief

The CFTC announced in a release that it filed suit against Louisiana to block the state from prohibiting designated contract markets, futures commission merchants and derivatives clearing organizations it regulates from offering event contracts. The agency said the action responds directly to a Louisiana state court order obtained Thursday, November 12, 2026, that it says shut down “more than 30 companies in the state connected to the trading of CFTC-regulated derivatives products without giving the defendants notice or an opportunity to be heard.”

Selig calls the state action “naked lawfare”

CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig attacked the Louisiana order in sharp terms, framing it as a political move rather than a legal one. The release quotes him directly on both the substance and the state’s timing.

“Event contracts have traded openly in Louisiana for years, in compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations. The state’s eleventh-hour ’emergency’ lawsuit seeking to shut down the entire prediction market industry is naked lawfare and a cynical political stunt.”

Michael S. Selig, CFTC Chairman

Selig said the Commission’s lawsuit “seeks to maintain the status quo while the federal courts decide this issue in an orderly manner.” The release does not specify which federal court the CFTC filed in, what form of relief it is requesting, or a timeline for a ruling.

A pattern across a dozen states

Louisiana is the 12th state the CFTC has sued over what the agency describes as its “exclusive jurisdiction over derivatives markets as granted by Congress under the Commodity Exchange Act.” The agency has also filed amicus briefs in four federal Courts of Appeal and one state Supreme Court on the same jurisdictional question, according to the release.

The document does not name the other 11 states, identify the more than 30 companies affected by the Louisiana order, or describe the legal theory Louisiana used to justify shutting down the firms without notice. It also does not say whether Louisiana has responded to the CFTC’s lawsuit or whether any of the affected companies have sought separate relief.

What a federal win or loss changes

For designated contract markets and clearing firms offering event contracts, a favorable federal ruling would reinforce that state regulators cannot unilaterally shut down CFTC-licensed products, a protection that currently rests on 12 separate active disputes rather than a single settled precedent. A loss, or a slow federal response, leaves exchanges exposed to the kind of same-day enforcement Louisiana used this week, which named firms learned about only after the fact.

For state attorneys general watching this fight, the Louisiana case tests whether state courts will grant “emergency” shutdown orders against federally regulated markets without an adversarial hearing, a procedural shortcut the CFTC is now explicitly challenging in federal court rather than simply the underlying policy question.

The BlockWest read. The number that matters here is 12, not 30. A dozen states pushing parallel shutdown efforts against CFTC-licensed event contracts means this is no longer a one-off state dispute but a jurisdictional fight the CFTC is fighting on multiple fronts simultaneously, and the Louisiana no-notice order raises the stakes by testing how far states will go procedurally before a federal court intervenes.

The next concrete event is a ruling from the federal court where the CFTC filed, which will determine whether Louisiana’s shutdown order stays blocked or the more than 30 named companies remain halted while the underlying jurisdictional question is litigated.

BlockWest is a news publication. Nothing here is investment advice. Read our disclaimer and editorial policy.