Menu

monetary policy

Fed confronts bond market pressure for more rate hikes than projected

Fed confronts bond market pressure for more rate hikes than projected

, , , , , ,

Treasury yields climbed further on Thursday (September 24, 2026), forcing the Federal Reserve to confront inflation pressure and market skepticism at the same time. Chairman Kevin Warsh, who has said he wants markets to help guide policy, now faces a bond market pushing him toward more rate hikes than the central bank projected just months ago.

  • Traders have raised the odds of a Fed rate hike in October, roughly a month after last week’s quarter-point increase.
  • RSM’s Joseph Brusuelas says the Fed may need five or six rate hikes, not the two or three he initially expected.
  • The 30-year Treasury bond has climbed to its highest level since 2004, reshaping the debate over how far the Fed must go.
  • 5.15% 10-year Treasury yield Thursday, closing in on RSM’s 5.5% stress case
  • 4.7% unemployment rate RSM models if the 10-year yield reaches 5.5%
  • 2004 last year the 30-year Treasury bond traded at today’s yield levels
  • 5 to 6 rate hikes Brusuelas says may be needed, up from an earlier call of three

The bond market is sending the Federal Reserve conflicting signals as officials try to avoid derailing the economy, according to CNBC. Treasury yields rose again Thursday as investors weighed inflation still running well above the Fed’s 2% target, another jump in energy prices, and heavy debt issuance tied to a global hyperscaler spending race in artificial intelligence.

Fed officials have historically looked past inflation spikes from temporary shocks such as energy price swings or tariffs. Not long ago, the AI investment boom was widely described as a short-lived, ultimately disinflationary trend.

That view is now shifting inside the central bank, which is reassessing whether these forces could produce more durable inflation. At the same time, Warsh’s Fed has offered little forward guidance, leaving investors uncertain whether policymakers or the market itself are setting the pace of rate moves.

Traders Price In An October Hike Just Weeks After September’s Move

Markets have moved quickly to price in a firmer Fed response to inflation. Over the past day, traders raised the probability of a rate hike in October, which would follow last week’s quarter-point increase by only about a month.

Traders also see a third hike landing either late this year or in early 2027, with additional hikes possible in subsequent months. That marks a sharp reversal from June, when the Fed projected it might hike once this year and then be done before starting to cut in the next couple of years.

RSM’s Brusuelas Says the Fed Needs Five or Six Hikes, Not Three

Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM, said his own outlook shifted after his firm modeled the effects of sustained AI-driven investment combined with sharply higher long-term yields. The modeling found that even a 10-year yield of 5.5%, above Thursday’s 5.15%, would slow growth to 1.5% and push unemployment to 4.7% while core inflation stayed stuck at 2.4%.

The Fed is underestimating what’s going to be necessary to restore price stability — that we’re probably not talking two or three hikes. We’re talking five or six.

Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist, RSM

Brusuelas argued the era of the Fed looking past supply shocks has ended. “The bias has to be towards restoring price stability, and they should take what’s going on seriously,” he said.

Not every economist agrees with that read. Citigroup economist Andrew Hollenhorst wrote in a note that the yield rise reflects investors pricing in higher policy rates rather than fears the Fed will let inflation run hot. “The rise in yields has not been due to expectations of a too-dovish Fed allowing inflation to persistently exceed target,” Hollenhorst wrote, adding that it should not be surprising this has lifted both short- and long-term yields together.

Warsh’s Market-Guided Approach Faces Its First Real Test

Several senior Fed officials who back near-term hikes are also urging caution against locking in a preset path. New York Fed President John Williams, who serves as FOMC vice chair, said Thursday it is “reasonable” to expect another hike by year-end but stressed the need to keep watching incoming data rather than commit to forward guidance. Philadelphia Fed President Anna Paulson likewise signaled more tightening is likely, but described it as “modest.”

Krishna Guha, head of economics and central bank strategy at Evercore ISI, said weak guidance leaves the Fed exposed either way. Delivering back-to-back hikes without explaining them risks an outsized hawkish repricing, he said, while skipping a hike the market has already priced in could trigger an equally sharp dovish swing.

The dilemma matters because Warsh has pushed the Fed to let market signals shape policy, a marked break from the forward-guidance approach used since the 2008 financial crisis. UBS economist Jonathan Pingle wrote that Warsh’s “framework appears significantly less rooted in economic measurement details and significantly more reflective of market narratives,” adding that no Fed chair has leaned on market signals this heavily before. Pingle also noted that after last week’s press conference, Warsh’s views appeared closer to those of Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, one of the more hawkish voting members this year, than to anyone else on the FOMC. Warsh had called for rate cuts before taking the chair’s job in May, underscoring how far the bond market has pulled him toward a hawkish stance.

The BlockWest read. A Fed chair who explicitly follows Treasury signals turns bond desks into de facto policymakers, and that raises the stakes for anyone holding rate-sensitive crypto and AI-adjacent equities. If Warsh keeps deferring to the 10-year, allocators should expect policy volatility to track hyperscaler debt issuance and oil headlines as much as CPI prints, a dynamic balance sheets built for a data-dependent Fed were not designed to price.

The next test comes at the Fed’s October meeting, where officials must decide whether to deliver a second hike within roughly a month of September’s move or pause and risk disappointing a market already pricing in tightening. Brusuelas maintains that markets, not the Fed’s own projections, are correctly reading the inflation risk, while Guha and Hollenhorst caution that traders may be getting ahead of the data. How Warsh resolves that split, without the forward guidance his predecessors relied on, will shape whether the FOMC ends 2026 with three hikes or the five to six Brusuelas now expects.

Philadelphia Fed’s Paulson says more rate increases may be needed to reach 2% inflation target

Philadelphia Fed’s Paulson says more rate increases may be needed to reach 2% inflation target

, , , , ,

Philadelphia Federal Reserve President Anna Paulson said Thursday (September 24) that policymakers may still need to raise interest rates further to bring inflation back to the Fed’s 2% target. Her remarks, delivered a week after the Federal Open Market Committee’s latest quarter-point hike, land as bond markets are already pricing in more tightening than the Fed has publicly committed to.

  • The FOMC raised its benchmark rate to a target range of 3.75%-4% at its most recent meeting
  • Underlying inflation is running at 2.5%-3%, Paulson said, well above the Fed’s 2% goal
  • Traders are pricing a 64% chance of another rate hike at the October FOMC meeting
  • 3.75%-4% current Fed funds target range after last week’s quarter-point hike
  • 2.5%-3% underlying inflation rate versus the Fed’s 2% target
  • 64% market-implied odds of an October rate hike from the FOMC
  • 4.8% futures-implied Fed funds rate by end of 2027, four hikes above current level

Speaking in prepared remarks at a fintech conference in her home district, Paulson said the Fed’s most recent quarter-point increase “brings policy closer to what I believe is needed to return inflation to 2% at a pace that balances inflation with risks to the labor market.” She added that “if conditions evolve as I expect, some modest further tightening may be warranted,” according to reporting by CNBC.

Paulson Says Underlying Inflation Still Sits Near 2.5%-3%

Paulson acknowledged that price pressures eased somewhat over the summer. But she said core inflation trends remain stuck well above the central bank’s stated goal.

“The best I can say about underlying inflation this year is that it hasn’t gotten worse,” Paulson said.

The best I can say about underlying inflation this year is that it hasn’t gotten worse.

Anna Paulson, President, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

She noted that the gap between the 2.5%-3% underlying rate and the Fed’s 2% target “has shown little signs of closing.” That framing suggests Paulson views last week’s hike, which lifted the funds rate to 3.75%-4%, as insufficient on its own to close the gap without further action.

Treasury Yields Hit Levels Not Seen Since 2004

Paulson’s comments arrived as bond markets moved further ahead of the Fed’s own guidance. Longer-duration Treasury yields climbed again this week, reaching levels not seen since 2004, a stretch of more than two decades.

Traders are now pricing a 64% probability that the FOMC hikes again at its October meeting. A further move is expected in January, according to market pricing referenced in CNBC’s report.

Fed funds futures contracts imply a rate of 4.8% by the end of 2027. That level would represent four additional quarter-point increases from the current 3.75%-4% range, a materially steeper path than the Fed has laid out in its own public commentary to date.

Williams Calls Another Hike Before Year-End ‘Reasonable’

New York Fed President John Williams added to the hawkish tone earlier Thursday. He said it is “reasonable” to expect another rate hike before the end of the year.

Neither Paulson nor Williams specified whether their preferred timing lines up with the October meeting that markets are currently favoring at 64% odds, or with the January move traders also expect. Their comments and the CNBC report do not include a response from FOMC members who have publicly favored a slower pace, leaving that side of the debate unaddressed in this reporting.

The BlockWest read. A funds rate path toward 4.8% by 2027 raises the discount rate applied to every long-duration asset, digital or otherwise, and tightens the funding backdrop for leveraged crypto positions and treasury-heavy balance sheets alike. Firms holding Bitcoin or other reserve assets on corporate books should be modeling carrying costs against a higher-for-longer rate regime, not the pause many had priced in earlier this year.

The next data point arrives at the FOMC’s October meeting, where futures markets currently assign a 64% probability to another quarter-point hike, with a subsequent move already expected by traders in January.

Swiss National Bank holds rates at 0% as traders bet on 2027 hikes

Swiss National Bank holds rates at 0% as traders bet on 2027 hikes

, , , , ,

The Swiss National Bank held its policy rate at 0% on Thursday (September 24), holding out against a global tightening cycle already underway at the Fed, ECB and Bank of Japan. Traders in interest rate markets now assign better than 90% odds that the SNB will start raising rates by early 2027, betting Switzerland’s exception cannot last.

  • Swiss annual inflation rose to 0.8% in August, still well below the 2% targets used by the Fed, ECB and Bank of England.
  • LSEG data show traders pricing close to 50-50 odds of a December hike and better than 90% odds of one by early 2027.
  • Traders are betting the SNB’s key rate reaches at least 0.75% by next September, according to LSEG data.
  • 0% current SNB policy rate versus rising rates at Fed, ECB, BOJ
  • 0.8% August Swiss inflation versus 2% Fed and ECB targets
  • 90%+ odds SNB hikes by early 2027, per LSEG trader pricing
  • 12% franc’s 2025 gain against the dollar before a 4% pullback this year

Switzerland’s central bank left its benchmark rate unchanged at 0% on Thursday, September 24, breaking with a tightening pattern now underway at its largest trading partners. The European Central Bank, the U.S. Federal Reserve and the Bank of Japan have all begun raising rates this year to fight inflation, and the central banks of Canada and the U.K. are expected to join them before year end, according to CNBC. The SNB’s holdout position is not expected to last: LSEG pricing cited by CNBC puts the odds of a hike versus a hold at roughly 50-50 in December, rising to better than 90% by early 2027.

Swiss Inflation At 0.8% Still Trails Fed, ECB Targets

Switzerland’s annual inflation rate climbed to 0.8% in August, driven by higher gasoline, diesel and heating oil costs. That is still far below the roughly 2% inflation now facing the U.S., U.K. and euro zone economies, whose central banks target 2% against an SNB range of 0% to 2%.

Antonio Fatás, a professor of economics at INSEAD business school and an external consultant for the IMF, told CNBC that Switzerland’s long run of low inflation keeps expectations anchored. “When a shock hits, a central bank that can rely on low inflation expectations will have an easier time managing inflation and keeping it low, that’s the case [for the likes of] Switzerland or Japan,” he said.

Fatás cautioned that the picture looks different once real rates, meaning nominal rates adjusted for inflation, are compared. “[An] interest rate at 0% and inflation around 0.8% means a real interest rate of -0.8%,” he told CNBC. “In the Euro area, an interest rate of 2.5% and inflation of around 3.2% means a real interest rate of -0.7%, so very similar. The U.K. and U.S. numbers are also similar even if slightly higher.”

Franc’s Safe-Haven Rally Cooled By 4% This Year

The Swiss franc’s status as a safe-haven currency has helped suppress inflation by making imports cheaper as the currency strengthens. As investors sought protection from widespread market volatility in 2025, the Swiss franc rose more than 12% against the dollar, but the greenback has clawed back around 4% against the franc so far this year.

Gedeon Tumong, head of finance specialization at Switzerland’s HIM Business School, told CNBC that Switzerland benefits from a “safe haven dividend.”

Unlike the U.S., the U.K. and the euro zone, Switzerland imports credibility as much as it imports goods. Consequently, foreign capital inflows support the Swiss franc, the strong Swiss Franc by extension curbs imported inflation and low inflation provides enough arguments for the central bank to maintain lower rates than the Fed, the Bank of England or the European central Bank.

Gedeon Tumong, head of finance specialization, HIM Business School

Tumong added that energy accounts for only about 3.5% of the Swiss inflation basket, versus roughly 7% in the euro zone, helped by hydropower and nuclear generation. He also pointed to Switzerland’s constitutional debt brake, which requires balanced budgets and keeps the government from having to offer higher bond yields to attract investors.

UBS Sees Hike Risk Moving Earlier Than June 2027

UBS economists had penciled in a preliminary SNB hike for June 2027, but a note earlier this month flagged reasons the move could come sooner. The bank cited the franc’s recent depreciation alongside elevated oil prices and resilient growth in the U.S. and euro zone economies.

“Swiss franc depreciation of more than 2% against the euro and more than 1% against the US dollar since the last SNB meeting in June could increase concerns that inflation will accelerate more than previously anticipated,” UBS economists wrote in the note. They added that while inflation is unlikely to breach 2% over the next 12 to 18 months, “the SNB has a history of surprising markets.”

LSEG data cited by CNBC show traders positioning for the SNB’s key rate to reach at least 0.75% by next September, a level still low by international standards but a marked shift from the current 0% floor. The SNB has intervened in currency markets before to manage franc strength and has signaled it would do so again if needed.

The BlockWest read. A 0% Swiss rate against a tightening world has kept the franc a magnet for capital fleeing volatility elsewhere, including flows that have touched digital asset allocators using Switzerland’s crypto-friendly banking corridors. If the SNB starts hiking by early 2027 as traders now expect, that carry advantage narrows, and treasuries parked in franc-denominated instruments for safety will face a genuine opportunity cost for the first time in years.

The SNB’s next scheduled policy decision will show whether the roughly 50-50 odds priced for December harden into an actual move, with UBS economists already flagging that a hike could land well before their original June 2027 estimate.

Christopher Phelan argues Fed rate hike would be mistake given lower inflation

Christopher Phelan argues Fed rate hike would be mistake given lower inflation

, , , , ,

White House economic adviser Christopher Phelan has directly challenged the Federal Reserve ahead of today’s rate decision, arguing that inflation data no longer supports tightening monetary policy. The statement adds political pressure to an already divided FOMC and signals potential conflict between the Trump administration and Fed Chair Kevin Warsh over the direction of interest rates.

  • Christopher Phelan, CEA chairman, told CNBC that a Fed rate hike would be a mistake given recent inflation trends.
  • Phelan cited lower inflation across major gauges including CPI and PCE over the past three months as justification.
  • The FOMC is expected to be closely divided, with markets pricing in rising odds of a hike today.
  • 9-3 Vote margin holding rates steady at July FOMC meeting, signaling committee splits
  • Today Federal Reserve announces rate decision following week-long FOMC committee meeting

According to reporting by BeInCrypto, Christopher Phelan, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, warned on CNBC’s Closing Bell Overtime that the Federal Reserve should not raise rates at today’s announcement. The Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s rate-setting body, concludes its meeting this week. Phelan argued that declining inflation across all major measures contradicts the case for tightening, while noting the Fed had declined to hike rates months earlier when price pressures were more acute.

Phelan Cites Falling Inflation Across All Major Measures

Phelan pointed to inflation trends across the Consumer Price Index and Personal Consumption Expenditures index to support his position against a rate increase. He stressed the logical inconsistency of holding rates steady when inflation ran hotter while considering a hike now that price growth has cooled. His argument directly contradicts Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s earlier signals that the central bank still has work to do on inflation.

No matter how you measure it, inflation is coming down. They didn’t choose to raise rates 3 months ago when inflation was higher. It doesn’t make sense to raise rates now in my view.

Christopher Phelan, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, on CNBC

Political Pressure Aligns With Trump Administration’s Rate Preferences

Phelan’s public pushback reflects President Donald Trump’s stated preference for lower interest rates rather than hikes. A rate increase would reverse the direction of monetary policy the administration has publicly favored, creating friction between the White House and the central bank at a sensitive moment. Fed watchers expect the committee to remain internally divided on the decision.

Market Impact Hinges on Warsh’s Vote and Forward Guidance

Bitcoin and broader risk assets face headwinds if the Fed raises rates, as traders have priced higher borrowing costs as a drag on non-yielding assets relative to bonds. The July FOMC meeting produced a nine-to-three vote to hold rates steady, demonstrating the committee’s split opinion. Fed Chair Warsh’s position on inflation and his remarks during today’s press conference will determine whether the committee votes to hike or hold, directly influencing borrowing costs and risk appetite in the sessions ahead.

The BlockWest read. Phelan’s intervention signals deepening friction between fiscal and monetary authorities over inflation’s trajectory. Markets read this as administration confidence that price pressures have cooled enough to justify holding or even cutting rates, a view the Fed’s own leadership has not yet endorsed. How Warsh frames inflation risk today will determine whether the White House gets the policy outcome it seeks.

Traders should watch Warsh’s press conference immediately following the rate announcement for clarity on the committee’s inflation assessment and any signals regarding the vote count. A hike would validate the hawkish faction despite Phelan’s public opposition, while a hold would suggest Warsh’s view has shifted toward the administration’s position.

Trump demands Fed cut rates to 1% after Warsh raises them to 3.75%

Trump demands Fed cut rates to 1% after Warsh raises them to 3.75%

, , , , ,

Trump’s public demand for steep rate cuts collides directly with the Federal Reserve’s decision to raise borrowing costs for the first time since 2023, reigniting a long-running conflict over central bank independence. The clash sets up a high-stakes test of whether presidential pressure can influence monetary policy as officials signal more hikes ahead.

  • Fed Chair Kevin Warsh raised rates to 3.75%-4% on Wednesday in the central bank’s first increase since 2023.
  • Sixteen of 18 Federal Open Market Committee officials project another rate hike before year-end, versus a different outlook in July.
  • Trump demanded rates fall to 1% or lower and threatened trade cuts against surplus countries if the Fed refuses to ease policy.
  • 1% Target rate Trump demanded, down from current 3.75%-4% range.
  • $1.5T Annual federal revenue Trump claims trade restrictions could generate.
  • 16 of 18 Fed officials projecting another rate hike before 2026 year-end.
  • 3.75%-4% New Fed funds rate after Warsh’s first hike as chair.

President Donald Trump demanded the Federal Reserve slash interest rates to 1% or lower on Wednesday, September 17, just hours after Fed Chair Kevin Warsh announced the central bank’s first rate increase since 2023, raising the benchmark rate to 3.75%-4%. BeInCrypto reported the immediate clash, which reopens a conflict Trump had allowed to simmer since Warsh replaced Jerome Powell at the helm of the central bank. The Federal Open Market Committee voted unanimously to raise rates, and updated projections show 16 of 18 officials expect another increase before year-end, a marked shift from the committee’s July outlook.

Trump’s Public Pressure Campaign Escalates Within Hours of Rate Decision

Trump took to Truth Social within hours of the announcement to air his frustration, arguing that the United States deserves near-zero borrowing costs because of its creditworthiness. In his post, Trump wrote: “LOWER THE INTEREST RATES FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND FAST!”

LOWER THE INTEREST RATES FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND FAST!

President Donald Trump, Truth Social

Trump also claimed that cutting trade with surplus countries could add at least $1.5 trillion annually to federal coffers, a figure fact-checkers have previously called overstated when Trump made similar claims. He had already threatened to restrict trade with surplus countries if the Fed refused to ease policy, a threat that touches most of the country’s largest trading partners.

White House Maintains Fed Independence While Trump Pressures Publicly

White House spokesman Kush Desai told Fox News that Trump still “absolutely” believes in the Federal Reserve’s independence, even as the president continues to pressure the institution publicly.

The contradiction between Trump’s stated commitment to Fed autonomy and his direct public demands highlights the tension between institutional norms and executive influence. Trump raised similar demands earlier in September as rate hike odds climbed, with the midterm elections adding political pressure to the central bank’s deliberations.

Markets React Amid Signals of More Tightening Ahead

Bitcoin’s price jumped in the minutes after Wednesday’s decision, even as it remained down for the day overall, while gold spiked at the same time before giving back its gains.

With traders still pricing in another rate hike this year, Warsh’s next press conference may determine whether Trump’s pressure campaign escalates further or moderates. The outcome will also depend partly on economic data between now and the Fed’s next meeting, and whether inflation trends give Warsh cover to pause or reverse course despite Trump’s demands.

The BlockWest read. Investors should focus on the substance of the Fed’s inflation case, not the noise. The committee explicitly dropped language blaming supply shocks for inflation and now frames rate hikes as supporting a faster return to its 2% target. This shift in reasoning, not Trump’s rhetoric, determines whether the rate path holds or bends.

Warsh’s next scheduled press conference will be the key moment to watch for any signal that Trump’s public pressure is influencing the Fed’s messaging or rate trajectory. Market participants and policy watchers should also monitor the next employment and inflation data releases before the committee’s next meeting, as those figures will likely determine whether officials hold firm on their projection of additional hikes this year.

Oil Outpaces Bitcoin and Gold as Fed Decision Looms on Wednesday

Oil Outpaces Bitcoin and Gold as Fed Decision Looms on Wednesday

, , , , ,

Oil prices rallied on Middle East supply disruptions while cryptocurrencies and precious metals fell ahead of the Federal Reserve’s Wednesday rate decision, revealing a divergence in how assets respond to geopolitical risk versus monetary policy shifts. The split highlights how investor positioning ahead of a major central bank announcement is reshaping traditional market correlations.

  • 2.75% Brent crude weekly gain versus same-week bitcoin decline percentage
  • 86.3% Probability traders assign to Fed rate hike, up from 59.4% one week prior
  • $2.62T Total crypto market capitalization after 4.32% decline in 24 hours
  • 4% Portion of global oil supply at risk from Saudi pipeline outage

Crude oil extended a rally that began in July, posting an 8% weekly gain that pushed prices above $100 per barrel for the first time since July, as geopolitical turmoil in the Middle East offset broader market anxiety over US interest rates. Bitcoin, ethereum, gold, silver, and copper all moved lower on Monday, signaling that investors are rotating away from traditional hedges and risk assets alike as the probability of tighter monetary policy climbs sharply.

The market divergence reflects a fundamental shift in how traders are weighing competing macroeconomic forces. Typically, rising interest rate expectations hurt both commodities and cryptocurrencies simultaneously, as higher borrowing costs reduce demand for speculative assets and increase opportunity costs for holding non-yielding instruments like digital currencies or precious metals. Yet the acute geopolitical crisis in the Middle East has created a supply shock powerful enough to sustain oil prices independent of monetary policy headwinds, creating a rare split in traditional correlations.

Saudi Pipeline Damage Lifts Oil Supply Risk Into Fed Week

Saudi Arabia shut its East-West pipeline late last week after drone strikes originating from Iraq caused damage to the critical infrastructure. The pipeline allows the kingdom to export crude without routing shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, making it essential to global supply security. The outage threatens up to 4% of global oil supply at a time when regional tensions are already elevated.

Fresh attacks from Yemen’s Houthis on Saudi territory and an assault on a vessel transiting the Strait of Hormuz compounded the supply squeeze in recent days.

The Houthi advance to Perim island on Friday strengthened their control over the Bab el-Mandeb corridor, which carries 4% to 5% of global supply. Crude’s gains reflect these supply-side pressures independent of Fed policy, creating a rare split between energy and traditional safe-haven assets that typically trade together during monetary tightening cycles. Energy traders view pipeline outages and regional conflict as immediate threats to crude availability, warranting premium prices regardless of longer-term economic slowdown risks from higher rates.

Fed Rate Expectations Trigger Broad Selloff Across Crypto and Metals

Inflation data hotter than expected over the weekend hardened the case for the Federal Reserve to raise rates, sending market participants’ pricing of a rate hike to 375-400 basis points to 86.3% from 59.4% just one week earlier. Bitcoin’s weekly decline of 4.4% reflected this shift in rate expectations, with the asset trading near $76,718 on Monday. Ethereum fell 1.79% to $2,478.43, while total crypto market capitalization dropped 4.32% to $2.62 trillion in 24 hours alone.

Precious metals provided no refuge, with gold easing 0.22% to $4,340.58, silver declining 0.25% to $64.11, and copper falling 1.08% to $6.40.

The moves mirror last week’s selloff in both gold and crypto, suggesting that higher interest rate expectations are weighing on all speculative and inflation-hedging assets simultaneously. Cryptocurrencies appear particularly vulnerable to Fed tightening, as digital assets lack cash flows or dividends to offset the impact of rising discount rates used by investors to value future returns. Precious metals, historically purchased as inflation hedges, lose appeal when higher interest rates reduce long-term inflation expectations and increase the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets. Crude’s independence from this dynamic underscores how supply-driven rallies can temporarily override broader macro trading flows.

The magnitude of the shift in Fed expectations reflects the market’s sensitivity to inflation data ahead of the central bank’s decision. The rapid increase in rate hike probability from 59.4% to 86.3% demonstrates how quickly consensus shifts when new economic data arrives, particularly in a risk environment where inflation remains sticky despite months of monetary tightening. This volatility in rate expectations creates uncertainty for asset managers trying to position portfolios heading into the Fed announcement.

Wednesday’s Fed Decision Will Test Whether Market Splits Hold

The divergence between oil and other risk assets hinges on whether geopolitical pressures sustain crude’s rally independent of monetary policy outcomes. A Fed rate increase could trigger broader risk-off sentiment that eventually pulls oil prices lower, even as Middle East tensions persist. Conversely, if the Fed signals a pause in tightening or begins considering rate cuts in coming months, the relief rally could benefit crypto and metals while potentially capping further crude gains absent additional supply shocks.

Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG, warned in a Sunday note that without progress from planned talks between Gulf states and Iran in Oman, crude could extend gains toward the $119.48 high reached in early March. Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi announced Monday that those talks had been postponed, removing a near-term catalyst for de-escalation. The delay eliminates a potential pressure valve for regional tensions and reduces the likelihood of quick diplomatic resolutions that might ease supply concerns.

Wednesday’s Federal Reserve rate decision will clarify whether crypto and metals can stabilize despite tighter policy, or whether the selloff deepens; simultaneously, the market will watch whether crude sustains its supply-shock gains or retreats if geopolitical tensions ease or if recession concerns from higher rates override inflationary oil concerns. The outcome will test whether traditional market correlations reassert themselves or whether supply-driven energy rallies can remain decoupled from broader monetary policy shifts for an extended period.

Federal Reserve Likely to Raise Interest Rates as Trump’s Economic Policies Face Scrutiny

Federal Reserve Likely to Raise Interest Rates as Trump’s Economic Policies Face Scrutiny

, , , , ,

Fed Chair Kevin Warsh faces a critical rate decision Wednesday amid mounting inflation data that contradicts Trump’s campaign for lower borrowing costs. The outcome will test whether Trump’s preferred Fed leader will diverge from the rate-cut agenda that secured his appointment.

  • Traders assign 86.9% probability to a Fed rate hike at next week’s meeting, defying Trump’s explicit pre-condition for cheaper money.
  • Core inflation rose 0.3% in August versus economist expectations of 0.2%, providing ammunition for officials arguing rate increases are necessary.
  • Warsh has held rates steady through two meetings since his May 22 swearing-in, after Powell cut three times in late 2025 before departing.
  • 86.9% Probability of Fed rate hike next meeting according to CME FedWatch Tool
  • 0.3% Monthly core inflation reading in August versus 0.2% consensus forecast
  • 4.1% August unemployment rate, unchanged from prior month with rising participation
  • 162,000 Jobs added in August, tepid labor market growth amid inflation concerns

President Trump spent months attacking Jerome Powell as a bottleneck to monetary easing, ultimately securing the departure of the previous Fed Chair and engineering the appointment of Kevin Warsh as his replacement. The strategy hinged on a straightforward premise: a Trump-friendly Fed leader would cut rates aggressively to stimulate the economy before the 2026 midterms. Powell did deliver three rate cuts in the final months of 2025, finishing on December 10. Warsh, who took office on May 22 after a spring campaign in which Trump called Powell tardy and overly cautious, has held rates steady through his first two meetings in June and July. The latest inflation data now threatens to demolish Trump’s rate-cut narrative entirely.

The political stakes reflect a fundamental tension in Federal Reserve governance. Presidents cannot legally direct monetary policy, yet the appointment power provides significant influence over long-term policy direction. Trump’s explicit linkage of Warsh’s nomination to an expectation of rate cuts represented an unusually transparent version of this dynamic. By publicly stating that lower rates were a condition for Warsh’s confirmation, Trump created a accountability mechanism that would make any rate increase appear to violate an implicit campaign promise.

CME FedWatch Tool Shows 86.9% Probability of Rate Increase

Market pricing on Friday placed near-certain odds on a Fed rate hike at the September meeting, contradicting the entire premise of Trump’s Fed Chair selection strategy. Analysts at the Kobeissi Letter framed the paradox bluntly: Trump had made rate cuts a precondition for his Fed Chair appointment, yet Warsh now faces mounting pressure to raise rates at his first major policy decision since assuming office.

The tension reflects a deeper bind for Warsh. No FOMC chair has cast a dissenting vote since 1939, meaning any rate move carries the weight of consensus backing. With three officials voting to raise rates at the July meeting, and inflation data now disappointing on the upside, the political calculus has shifted sharply against the low-rate environment Trump promised during his campaign. Warsh’s colleagues have signaled discomfort with the current rate level relative to inflation trends, creating institutional pressure that transcends Trump’s political preferences.

The broader economic backdrop adds complexity to Warsh’s decision. Financial conditions have tightened considerably since Powell’s final rate cut in December, with credit spreads widening and equity volatility rising in recent weeks. Some economists argue that the Fed’s effective tightening through market dynamics may already be restraining growth without an official rate increase. This technical debate provides intellectual cover for either a rate hold or a hike, depending on how policymakers weight forward-looking risks.

Core Inflation Beats Expectations Higher, Triggering Hike Fears

Friday’s consumer price report delivered the data point Warsh apparently hoped to avoid. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and fuel, climbed 0.3% in August when economists had forecast 0.2%. Gasoline prices spiked 3.9% in a single month, adding to headline inflation pressures that extend beyond the Fed’s direct control. Fed Governor Christopher Waller had previously signaled that a hot core inflation reading would place a rate increase on his agenda, and Friday’s miss in the dovish direction supplied exactly that trigger.

The inflation surprise carries particular significance because core price growth had been moderating in recent months. A reacceleration in the core rate suggests that the disinflationary trend Powell relied upon may be reversing. UBS now expects two rate increases this year, a significant revision upward from prior guidance. Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, argued that Warsh may fear repeating Powell’s error of waiting too long to tighten policy. A rate hike could cool price pressures and ultimately benefit lower-income Americans by reducing inflation, she contended.

Other voices, including Daniel Lacalle, chief economist at Tressis, countered that hiking into a labor market still posting only 162,000 jobs in August and 4.1% unemployment would violate the Fed’s dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment. This disagreement reflects genuine uncertainty about whether current inflation reflects persistent demand pressures or temporary supply-side factors that will fade without policy tightening.

Kevin Hassett, who leads the National Economic Council, offers the White House counterargument by pointing to a three-month core inflation rate of 1.6%, a shorter window that paints a less alarming picture than the standard Federal Reserve methodology.

Warsh’s Wednesday Vote Tests Trump’s Real Influence Over Monetary Policy

Warsh casts his first major rate-setting vote on Wednesday, and the outcome will definitively answer whether Trump’s appointment of a sympathetic Fed Chair translates into actual policy shifts. The President explicitly made rate cuts a condition of Warsh’s hiring, yet market expectations now suggest his first move may go in the opposite direction. Trump has repeatedly stated his preference for rates near 1%, a target that assumes sustained monetary easing regardless of inflation trends.

Warsh sent carefully prepared remarks at Jackson Hole laying out his intentions, including hawkish language about inflation. If he does vote to raise rates, it would suggest that the inflation reality supersedes political pressure. If he holds steady or cuts despite Friday’s data, it would vindicate Trump’s bet that personnel changes at the Fed matter more than economic conditions. The labor market data complicates either narrative: 162,000 jobs and rising participation suggest enough economic momentum to absorb a hike, yet still fall short of the robust expansion that would clearly justify tightening.

Historical precedent provides limited guidance for this scenario. Fed Chairs typically resist overt political pressure while remaining sensitive to broader policy coordination. Warsh’s background in financial markets and prior Fed service gives him credibility with both the administration and the broader central banking community, potentially allowing him to navigate this minefield more gracefully than his predecessor.

Bitcoin and gold both declined on the Friday CPI reaction but recovered almost immediately, suggesting crypto markets are pricing in rate uncertainty rather than conviction. Warsh’s decision on Wednesday will establish whether Trump’s preferred Fed Chair becomes the rate-cutting instrument he appointed, or whether inflation dynamics override political calculations. The answer carries consequences well beyond asset prices: it will determine whether the White House can engineer the 1% federal funds rate Trump has publicly targeted and whether future presidents can realistically expect their Fed appointees to prioritize electoral cycles over price stability.

Three Central Banks May Increase Interest Rates Over the Next Eight Days: Details on Which Banks and Their Timing

Three Central Banks May Increase Interest Rates Over the Next Eight Days: Details on Which Banks and Their Timing

, , , , ,

Three major central banks face imminent decisions on interest rates within eight days, with two appearing likely to raise and one still in genuine doubt. The outcomes will signal whether global policymakers view recent energy shocks as temporary or as a harbinger of persistent inflation.

  • The European Central Bank is widely expected to raise its deposit rate by 0.25 percentage points to 2.5% on Thursday.
  • The Bank of Japan faces 97% odds of a 0.25 percentage point increase to 1.25% on September 18, according to swap contracts.
  • The Federal Reserve shows 61.2% probability of a hike to 375-400 basis points, with the August jobs report on Friday potentially moving markets.
  • 97% Probability of Bank of Japan rate hike versus 61% odds for the Federal Reserve
  • 3.4% Headline US inflation in July, down from 3.5% in June but above 2% target
  • 100 bps Cumulative European Central Bank rate increase since May versus zero for the Fed
  • 1.1% to 2.5% Bank of Japan’s estimated neutral rate range versus current 1% policy rate

Rate markets are bracing for a sequence of monetary tightening across the Group of Seven this month as central banks grapple with energy shocks tied to the war in Iran. The European Central Bank decides Thursday in Berlin, the Bank of Japan convenes September 18, and the Federal Reserve follows in between. All three institutions face pressure from higher fuel and chemical prices, though the urgency and conviction behind rate moves varies sharply across the Atlantic and Pacific.

The concentrated timing of these decisions reflects the interconnected nature of global monetary policy and markets. When major central banks move in close succession, their actions amplify signals about the global economic outlook and can influence currency markets, bond yields, and capital flows across borders. The divergence in conviction levels among the three institutions underscores deeper questions about the health of their respective economies and the staying power of current inflationary pressures.

ECB All But Certain to Raise to 2.5% After Six-Week Hiatus

The European Central Bank is expected to lift its deposit rate by 0.25 percentage points to 2.5% from 2.25%, with consensus among policymakers and economists nearly unanimous. All but one analyst in a Bloomberg poll forecasts the move, and all 65 economists surveyed by Reuters between August 31 and September 3 expect a quarter-point hike. Support for the decision has hardened since August, when 83% of economists backed a hike, compared to 72% ahead of the July meeting when the ECB held rates steady.

The ECB’s shift toward greater hawkishness reflects mounting concern about price pressures in the euro area. Euro area inflation climbed above 3% last month, reaching its highest level in nearly three years, and price pressures show little sign of easing in the near term. Energy costs have surged following geopolitical tensions, feeding through into transportation, manufacturing, and consumer prices across the region.

A rate increase would position the ECB as the most hawkish central bank among the Group of Seven, cementing its position as the region most committed to fighting inflation through monetary restraint. The ECB has raised rates by 100 basis points cumulatively since May, a pace that stands in stark contrast to the Federal Reserve’s unchanged stance over the same period. This divergence reflects the ECB’s determination to prevent inflation from becoming entrenched in wage-setting behavior and pricing expectations.

Bank of Japan Signals Resolve Despite Narrow Economic Slack

Swap contracts show roughly 97% odds that the Bank of Japan will raise its policy rate by 0.25 percentage points to 1.25% on September 18, moving from its current 1% setting. Board member Kazuyuki Masu stated that the BOJ will continue raising its policy rate, and explicitly tied the urgency to energy shocks from the war in Iran.

The BOJ’s near-certain rate increase represents a significant milestone in its gradual exit from ultra-loose monetary policy. The bank has maintained accommodative conditions for years as Japan struggled with persistent deflation and weak growth, making any tightening cycle a notable shift in approach.

If inflation accelerates here, there is a risk that the Bank might inevitably need to implement a rapid policy interest rate hike.

Kazuyuki Masu, Bank of Japan Board Member

The BOJ estimates its neutral rate sits between 1.1% and 2.5%, suggesting policymakers still have meaningful room to tighten before reaching equilibrium. Masu pointed to higher shipping fees and fertilizer costs feeding into food prices and broader goods inflation, and warned that “there are concerns that the price hikes in these goods may not be temporary shocks but rather represent more enduring trends that risk pushing up overall prices.”

This language reflects the central challenge facing all three institutions. Energy and commodity shocks are inherently difficult to parse: temporary supply disruptions that fade as markets rebalance, or structural shifts that permanently reset price levels and inflation expectations. The BOJ’s emphasis on risk management suggests it is preparing for the possibility of more persistent inflation, even if current data do not yet prove that case conclusively.

Fed Decision Hinges on Friday’s August Inflation Report

The Federal Reserve carries the widest range of outcomes, with CME FedWatch showing a 61.2% probability of a rate increase to 375-400 basis points from the current 350-375 range. A hold registers 38.8% probability, and futures assign zero probability to a cut, marking a full reversal from January when most economists still forecast at least one cut in 2024.

Three Federal Reserve officials dissented in favor of a quarter-point hike at the July 29 meeting, but the committee ultimately held steady. The case for action rests on persistent inflation above target, offset by a resilient labor market that gives policymakers flexibility to move cautiously. Headline inflation eased to 3.4% in July from 3.5% in June, still well above the 2% target, while employers added 162,000 jobs in August against forecasts near 53,000 and unemployment held at 4.1%.

The Fed faces a genuine dilemma. Raising rates risks cooling an economy that has shown surprising strength even as inflation remains elevated. Holding steady risks allowing expectations to drift upward if energy-driven price increases persist or accelerate further. The committee’s hesitation to move thus far, despite higher inflation than either the ECB or BOJ faced, suggests concern about growth risks that its counterparts may view as less pressing.

The August consumer price index lands Friday, September 11, five days before the Federal Reserve’s decision. A hotter-than-expected print would strengthen the case for a hike; a cooler reading would give the committee room to postpone action and await further clarity on whether energy-driven price increases will persist or fade.

A Repeated US Treasury Action Previously Propelled Bitcoin From $65K to $80K, Yet Failed to Produce Similar Results Today

A Repeated US Treasury Action Previously Propelled Bitcoin From $65K to $80K, Yet Failed to Produce Similar Results Today

, , , , , , ,

The Treasury Department’s second round of bond buyback expansion failed to lift bitcoin as its first did, revealing that market sentiment now depends on macro conditions rather than policy announcements alone. Rising yields, inflation concerns, and hawkish Fed expectations are overwhelming the supportive signal that Treasury intervention once sent.

  • Treasury doubled buybacks to $4 billion on August 19, sending Bitcoin from $65,000 to $80,000 within days.
  • Treasury tripled buybacks to $6 billion on September 9, but Bitcoin dipped below $78,000 and remained flat.
  • Wall Street had expected buybacks to reach $10 billion, making the $6 billion increase appear insufficient to markets.
  • $4B Initial Treasury buyback increase announced August 19 from prior $2B baseline
  • $6B Second Treasury buyback increase announced September 9, below $10B market expectations
  • 4.85% 10-year Treasury yield after September 9 announcement, highest in almost three years
  • 5.30% 20-year and 30-year Treasury yields reached following latest buyback announcement

On August 19, Treasury Department official Scott Bessent announced an unexpected policy shift: the government would at least double its liquidity-support buybacks for longer-dated government debt, raising the maximum operation size from $2 billion to $4 billion. Financial markets responded immediately. Bitcoin surged alongside gold and other risk assets, while long-term Treasury yields declined sharply. By purchasing older long-term Treasuries, the government aimed to improve liquidity in a bond market facing rapidly rising yields. Declining yields typically reduce bond appeal and ease overall financial conditions, creating a more favorable environment for bitcoin and other risk-sensitive assets.

The August announcement came at a critical moment when the Treasury bond market was experiencing significant strain. Long-term yields had climbed sharply as the Federal Reserve maintained its restrictive interest rate posture through the summer. The Treasury’s buyback program, formally known as operations to smooth the maturity structure of the debt, is designed to address temporary liquidity dislocations in the secondary bond market. However, the scale of intervention on August 19 suggested the government was concerned about deeper structural issues in the bond market. This concern, combined with the policy response, signaled to investors that officials were willing to support financial conditions. Asset prices rallied on the perception that this Treasury action represented a shift toward accommodation.

The Second Announcement Failed To Replicate August’s Price Surge

Less than a month later, on September 9, the Treasury announced it would triple the buyback size to $6 billion.

This time, markets reacted very differently. The 10-year Treasury yield jumped to 4.85%, its highest level in nearly three years, while 20-year and 30-year yields climbed to around 5.30%. Bitcoin did not rally as it had in August. Instead, it dipped below $78,000 and has struggled to reclaim that level since the announcement.

The policy action was ostensibly identical in character to the August move. Yet the market response diverged sharply, signaling that the underlying conditions driving asset prices had shifted in the interim. This divergence illustrates a fundamental principle in financial markets: the same policy action produces different outcomes depending on the macroeconomic environment and what investors have already priced into asset valuations.

Market Expectations and Macro Headwinds Overwhelmed the Policy Signal

The September 9 announcement lacked the element of surprise that amplified markets’ August reaction. Bessent’s August statement had signaled an unexpected policy shift, prompting investors to reprice the likelihood that the government would intervene more aggressively as borrowing costs surged. By September, the market had already priced in buyback support and had moved its expectations higher. Wall Street analysts had estimated the Treasury could raise buybacks to as much as $10 billion based on Bessent’s earlier comments, making the $6 billion figure appear insufficient rather than bullish. When the announcement fell short of this anticipated level, it created disappointment that offset any supportive impact from the increased commitment.

Simultaneously, the macroeconomic backdrop deteriorated significantly between the two announcements.

Oil prices surged past $100 per barrel amid escalating US-Iran tensions, reigniting inflation concerns across financial markets. Strong employment data released in early September and hawkish commentary from Federal Reserve official Kevin Warsh raised the prospect of a rate hike when the Fed meets on September 16. These factors pushed Treasury yields higher faster than the government’s buyback operations could push them down. The Kobeissi Letter characterized the dynamic as the bond market actively “fighting” the Treasury’s efforts, warning that the 10-year yield could exceed 5% if current conditions persisted. This framing reflects how inflation expectations and Fed policy expectations have become the dominant drivers of long-term bond yields in recent years.

Why The Same Policy Produced Opposite Market Outcomes

The critical distinction lies not in the Treasury’s actions themselves but in what those actions signaled about financial conditions and asset valuations. In August, the buyback announcement reshaped market expectations about yields, liquidity, and risk appetite. The policy action arrived without preparation and represented a genuine shift in government positioning. By September, the Treasury’s doubled commitment to buybacks was already incorporated into market pricing and was being overwhelmed by stronger hawkish signals from other parts of the policy landscape.

The divergence between the two market reactions also highlights how bitcoin has become increasingly sensitive to macro factors that determine overall financial conditions. Early in its history, bitcoin was often treated as a pure speculative or monetary asset, responding primarily to supply conditions and technical factors. Today, bitcoin’s price moves correlate more closely with real interest rates, inflation expectations, and the Fed policy outlook. When these macro headwinds are strong, even supportive policy announcements from the Treasury cannot overcome the broader sentiment shift.

Bitcoin’s price action ultimately reflects the net effect of competing forces. When the August announcement alone dominated sentiment, it lifted bitcoin alongside risk assets. When the September announcement arrived in a macro environment marked by higher inflation expectations, oil price spikes, and the prospect of Fed rate increases, those headwinds proved stronger than the supportive signal from Treasury intervention. Markets will continue testing whether the Fed’s September 16 decision introduces new clarity about the path of monetary policy, or whether inflation and geopolitical risks will keep pushing yields and crushing speculative appetite regardless of Treasury support. The experience demonstrates that even aggressive policy support cannot sustainably drive asset prices higher if underlying macro conditions are deteriorating.

Bitcoin Retreats Under $80K While Federal Reserve Rate Increase Probability Rises: Bitfinex Alpha

Bitcoin Retreats Under $80K While Federal Reserve Rate Increase Probability Rises: Bitfinex Alpha

, , , , , , ,

Bitcoin’s dip below $80,000 reflects rising expectations for Federal Reserve rate hikes following robust US employment data, a headwind for risk assets that could reverse if sustained ETF inflows prove resilient. The strength of upcoming inflation readings and ETF demand will likely determine whether higher rates remain a ceiling on Bitcoin’s near-term upside.

  • Bitcoin fell below $80,000 as markets priced a 60% probability of a Fed rate hike on September 16.
  • The US added 162,000 jobs in August with unemployment holding steady at 4.1%, signaling labor market resilience.
  • Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded nearly $1 billion in net inflows last week despite elevated short-term interest rates.
  • $80,000 Level Bitcoin dipped below, down from $82,400 peak reached September 3
  • 60% Market odds of a Federal Reserve rate hike on September 16
  • 4.34% Two-year US Treasury yield after rising on strong jobs data
  • 42% Bitcoin’s gain above its July low despite recent pullback

Bitcoin traded below the psychologically significant $80,000 level this week as strong US labor market data shifted market expectations toward another Federal Reserve rate hike. The August jobs report showed the US economy added 162,000 positions while unemployment remained at 4.1%, reinforcing perceptions that the central bank has less urgency to cut rates. Market pricing now places the probability of a rate increase on September 16 at roughly 60%, up from lower expectations earlier in the month.

The robust employment figures pushed two-year Treasury yields above 4.34%, making safer fixed-income assets more competitive with volatile digital assets. In the broader context of monetary policy expectations, this shift represents a meaningful reassessment by markets of the Fed’s trajectory. Earlier in the year, investors had anticipated a more aggressive series of rate cuts beginning in summer, but persistent inflation and labor market strength have extended the timeline for monetary easing.

Treasury Yields Rise as Bonds Challenge Bitcoin’s Recovery

Higher interest rates traditionally pressure Bitcoin because government bonds and money market instruments offer improved risk-adjusted returns without the volatility of cryptocurrencies. When Treasury yields climb, the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like Bitcoin increases, potentially redirecting capital toward fixed-income investments. Yet Bitcoin proved more resilient than might be expected given the headwinds, oscillating between roughly $77,200 and $82,100 after reaching an intraweek high of $82,400 on September 3.

The cryptocurrency nonetheless remains approximately 42% above the lows it hit in July, indicating a measurable recovery despite rate pressures. This resilience suggests that investors view Bitcoin’s longer-term value proposition as distinct from near-term interest rate dynamics. Historically, Bitcoin has often performed well in periods of monetary expansion, but it has also demonstrated the ability to attract capital during phases of monetary tightening when investors seek portfolio diversification.

The persistence of elevated short-term rates has not deterred institutional capital flows into the cryptocurrency space. US spot Bitcoin ETFs pulled in nearly $1 billion in net inflows during the past week, suggesting that some investors view current prices as attractive entry points even with rate hike odds climbing. This pattern reflects the growing maturation of crypto markets, where institutional investors increasingly participate alongside traditional hedging strategies.

ETF Demand May Prove Decisive as Inflation Data Looms

The introduction of spot Bitcoin ETFs in early 2024 fundamentally altered the dynamics of institutional capital allocation in cryptocurrencies. These products provided a simplified mechanism for traditional asset managers to gain Bitcoin exposure without managing custody or navigating direct market participation. Analysts at Bitfinex flagged this week’s inflation report as a critical test for Bitcoin’s trajectory, particularly whether ETF inflows can sustain momentum while short-term interest rates remain elevated.

Should large fund flows into spot Bitcoin ETFs persist under those conditions, it would suggest that higher rates are no longer the dominant factor constraining a broader recovery. A sustained pipeline of institutional capital could support further gains if other macroeconomic conditions remain supportive. The relationship between ETF flows and price action has become increasingly important for understanding Bitcoin’s market mechanics.

Bitcoin also sits near a historical inflection point on its profit distribution. Currently, more than 71% of Bitcoin’s supply trades in profit, approaching the long-term average of 74.7% at which market regime shifts have historically occurred. A weekly close above $82,100 could reinforce momentum toward recovery, while an unexpected inflation print could intensify pressure on Bitcoin if it prompts Fed officials to signal more aggressive rate action.

The interplay between Fed monetary policy and cryptocurrency valuations remains complex and multifaceted. While higher rates traditionally hurt risk assets, Bitcoin’s scarcity and role as a potential inflation hedge create countervailing forces. Some analysts argue that the cryptocurrency’s 15-year track record of appreciation despite various rate cycles demonstrates its positioning as a separate asset class with its own fundamental dynamics.

The cryptocurrency market is now waiting for the US inflation report and any signals from Federal Reserve communications before the September 16 rate decision. A cooler-than-expected inflation number could ease rate hike expectations and remove near-term headwinds, while stronger inflation could validate the 60% probability now priced into futures markets and potentially test Bitcoin’s resolve around the $77,200 support level. Investors should monitor both macro data releases and ETF flow patterns as indicators of institutional sentiment.

Load More

Back To Top
© BlockWest 2026
BlockWest Media LLC

Equities, AI, and blue-chip crypto, covered as one connected market.

Sections

Company

Legal

Follow

𝕏 ▶ in

© 2026 BlockWest. All rights reserved.