Menu

Inflation

Fed Governor Cook warns AI investment risks broadening inflation

Fed Governor Cook warns AI investment risks broadening inflation

, ,

Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook said artificial intelligence investment is adding to inflation that has run above the Fed’s target for five straight years, and that broader price pressure tied to AI may not ease before year end. Cook laid out the analysis in a speech Monday, September 28, 2026, at the Oakland Tech Week Opening Keynote in Oakland, California, an event cohosted by the Kapor Center.

  • Cook said companies have spent only a small fraction of $2 trillion in announced AI investment plans
  • Electricity and water costs are each up about 5 percent over the past year, core goods prices over 3 percent
  • Watch whether AI-linked price pressure broadens further in coming inflation data before year end
  • $2T announced AI investment, only a small fraction spent
  • 5% rise in electricity and water costs over past year
  • 3%+ core goods price pace versus pre-pandemic decline
  • 71% of AI-using small firms reporting productivity gains

Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook told the audience that AI-related price pressure is spreading beyond the technology sector itself and into inputs used across the economy. In the speech, titled “An Update on AI and the Economy,” Cook said inflation has stayed above the Fed’s 2 percent target for the past five years and that AI-driven investment has been a factor over the past year, with prices for AI-related chips, computers and software surging.

Cook says data-center buildout is bleeding into broader inflation

Cook said data-center investment relies on construction labor and energy that are used broadly across the economy, which could push prices up in sectors well outside AI itself. She cited electricity and water costs each up about 5 percent over the past year and core goods prices running above a 3 percent annual pace, both trends she linked in part to AI-related demand and to equity gains from AI enthusiasm feeding into household spending.

She said even more capital is queued up behind what has already been deployed. Cook noted that “companies have only spent a small fraction of the $2 trillion in announced plans,” and separately said “I do not expect those effects to arrive in time to offset the broadening inflationary pressure later this year,” referring to any disinflationary boost from AI-driven productivity gains.

Cook rules out using rate policy to chase sector-specific prices

Cook said narrowly concentrated price surges in AI-related goods should resolve on their own as supply chains adjust, without a monetary policy response.

“Our tools are too blunt to target narrow sectors, and addressing relative price shifts is not our role.”

Lisa Cook, Federal Reserve Governor

She distinguished that narrow effect from the broader, economy-wide pressure she said AI investment and related wealth effects are now generating, which she said falls squarely within the Fed’s purview.

Labor market has held steady, but coding, translation and entry-level jobs show strain

Cook said the unemployment rate and layoffs have remained low and relatively flat over the past two years even as AI adoption has accelerated. She said there is evidence AI may be reducing labor demand in coding jobs in software and in simultaneous translation, and that recent college graduates are facing more difficulty finding first jobs, which she said is possibly linked to AI absorbing entry-level tasks.

She flagged a scenario in which AI produces a temporary rise in unemployment driven by a mismatch between workers’ skills and available jobs rather than a shortfall in demand. In that case, she said the Fed would have limited tools, since cutting the federal funds rate to address unemployment in that scenario could risk fueling inflation instead.

Small firms outpacing the large-company narrative, survey shows

Cook pointed to the Federal Reserve’s Small Business Credit Survey, released earlier this year, which found nearly half of small employer firms are using AI and 71 percent of those report increased productivity as a result. She said AI tools have made it cheaper and easier to start businesses, which she linked to a recent boom in new business formation, and said this challenges the assumption that only large, resource-rich firms can deploy AI effectively.

The BlockWest read. Cook is telling markets the Fed will not lean against AI capex inflation with rate hikes, which keeps financing conditions for data-center and GPU buildouts unchanged for now even as electricity costs and core goods prices climb. For allocators and banks underwriting AI infrastructure debt, the signal is that a supply-mismatch labor scenario, not sector-specific price spikes, is the risk that would actually move policy.

Cook did not say whether other FOMC members share her read on AI-driven inflation or how it will factor into the committee’s next rate decision, leaving that assessment for upcoming inflation and employment data to answer.

Diesel hits second nominal record in a week, pressuring Fed inflation outlook

Diesel hits second nominal record in a week, pressuring Fed inflation outlook

, , , , , , ,

US on-highway diesel touched a fresh nominal high of $6.529 a gallon on Monday (September 21), extending a run of record readings that raises the stakes for the Federal Reserve’s next inflation call. The move matters for crypto markets because a sustained freight-cost squeeze could keep interest rates elevated longer, a headwind for assets like Bitcoin that are sensitive to financing conditions.

  • US on-highway diesel hit $6.529 a gallon on Sept. 21, up 24.4 cents from the prior week (approximately $6.285), per EIA data.
  • US distillate stockpiles fell to 107.431 million barrels for the week ended Sept. 18, down from 107.859 million barrels a week earlier.
  • BLS producer-price data show diesel fuel prices jumped 24.1% in August from July, while its truck freight transportation index rose 2.0%.
  • $6.529 diesel price per gallon Sept. 21, a new nominal record
  • 24.4¢ weekly diesel price gain, up from about $6.285
  • 24.1% August jump in diesel producer prices from July
  • 3.75%-4% Fed funds target range set Sept. 16 on inflation concerns

According to reporting by CryptoSlate, US on-highway diesel climbed to $6.529 a gallon on Sept. 21, according to the Energy Information Administration’s Gasoline and Diesel Fuel Update. The reading was up 24.4 cents from the week before, and it landed just days after the EIA had already flagged the lower Sept. 14 print as a nominal-dollar record.

That means the Sept. 21 figure marks a second consecutive nominal high across consecutive weeks. The EIA’s record designation applies strictly to the dollar amount paid at the pump, with no adjustment for inflation.

Diesel sets a second nominal record in a week, EIA data show

The distinction between a nominal record and an inflation-adjusted one matters for how the number should be read. A nominal high simply means diesel has never cost this many dollars per gallon before, not that it is historically expensive once broader price growth since past spikes is factored in.

Even so, two consecutive weekly records in the EIA’s own dataset signal that the increase is not a one-day anomaly. Diesel is the fuel that moves the bulk of US freight by truck and rail, so a sustained climb feeds directly into shipping costs across the supply chain.

Distillate stocks fall to 107.431 million barrels as EIA cites tight global supply

The EIA’s weekly petroleum data, published Sept. 23, put US distillate stocks at 107.431 million barrels for the week ended Sept. 18, down from 107.859 million barrels the week before. The roughly 428,000-barrel draw narrows the buffer available to absorb further demand or supply shocks.

The agency traces the price surge to tight global distillate supply combined with elevated crude oil prices, a dynamic it has detailed in its Today in Energy analysis. Whether trucking and rail operators pass higher fuel costs on to customers, and how fast, depends on existing contracts, competitive pressure and how long the fuel squeeze lasts.

A single expensive week at the pump is not the same as a sustained rise across freight billing cycles. The latter poses the larger inflation risk that would matter to rate-setters.

Producer prices already show pass-through, next CPI print due Oct. 14

Upstream data suggest the pressure was already building before the latest retail record. The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ producer price index release showed diesel fuel producer prices jumped 24.1% in August from July, while its truck freight transportation price index rose 2.0% over the same period. Both readings predate the Sept. 21 diesel record.

The Federal Reserve raised its target range to 3.75%-4% on Sept. 16, citing elevated inflation, a decision made before the latest diesel print. August consumer prices, the most recent CPI data available, rose 0.4% from July, but that report also predates the new diesel high.

The next releases will offer a more direct test. BLS is scheduled to publish September CPI on Wed Oct 14 and September producer prices on Thu Oct 15, followed by the BEA’s Personal Income and Outlays report, which includes PCE price data, on Oct. 29.

What the diesel and distillate data leave open is whether the fuel-cost pressure actually shows up in those September and October figures, or fades if crude and global distillate supply loosen. The EIA’s own dataset does not forecast pass-through; it only confirms the price and inventory levels through Sept. 21 and Sept. 18 respectively.

The BlockWest read. The diesel print is not a Bitcoin story yet, it is a rate-path story that crypto allocators cannot ignore. If September CPI and PPI on Oct. 14 and Oct. 15 confirm freight-cost pass-through, the Fed’s 3.75%-4% range looks more like a floor than a peak, and leveraged crypto positions built on rate-cut bets carry more downside than their holders may be pricing in today.

Bitcoin’s reaction to the diesel data has not yet been established in the reporting reviewed here. The next concrete checkpoints are the BLS’s September CPI release on Wed Oct 14, its producer price data on Thu Oct 15, and the BEA’s PCE price data on Oct. 29, any of which could confirm or undercut the case that fuel costs are feeding into broader inflation.

Philadelphia Fed’s Paulson says more rate increases may be needed to reach 2% inflation target

Philadelphia Fed’s Paulson says more rate increases may be needed to reach 2% inflation target

, , , , ,

Philadelphia Federal Reserve President Anna Paulson said Thursday (September 24) that policymakers may still need to raise interest rates further to bring inflation back to the Fed’s 2% target. Her remarks, delivered a week after the Federal Open Market Committee’s latest quarter-point hike, land as bond markets are already pricing in more tightening than the Fed has publicly committed to.

  • The FOMC raised its benchmark rate to a target range of 3.75%-4% at its most recent meeting
  • Underlying inflation is running at 2.5%-3%, Paulson said, well above the Fed’s 2% goal
  • Traders are pricing a 64% chance of another rate hike at the October FOMC meeting
  • 3.75%-4% current Fed funds target range after last week’s quarter-point hike
  • 2.5%-3% underlying inflation rate versus the Fed’s 2% target
  • 64% market-implied odds of an October rate hike from the FOMC
  • 4.8% futures-implied Fed funds rate by end of 2027, four hikes above current level

Speaking in prepared remarks at a fintech conference in her home district, Paulson said the Fed’s most recent quarter-point increase “brings policy closer to what I believe is needed to return inflation to 2% at a pace that balances inflation with risks to the labor market.” She added that “if conditions evolve as I expect, some modest further tightening may be warranted,” according to reporting by CNBC.

Paulson Says Underlying Inflation Still Sits Near 2.5%-3%

Paulson acknowledged that price pressures eased somewhat over the summer. But she said core inflation trends remain stuck well above the central bank’s stated goal.

“The best I can say about underlying inflation this year is that it hasn’t gotten worse,” Paulson said.

The best I can say about underlying inflation this year is that it hasn’t gotten worse.

Anna Paulson, President, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

She noted that the gap between the 2.5%-3% underlying rate and the Fed’s 2% target “has shown little signs of closing.” That framing suggests Paulson views last week’s hike, which lifted the funds rate to 3.75%-4%, as insufficient on its own to close the gap without further action.

Treasury Yields Hit Levels Not Seen Since 2004

Paulson’s comments arrived as bond markets moved further ahead of the Fed’s own guidance. Longer-duration Treasury yields climbed again this week, reaching levels not seen since 2004, a stretch of more than two decades.

Traders are now pricing a 64% probability that the FOMC hikes again at its October meeting. A further move is expected in January, according to market pricing referenced in CNBC’s report.

Fed funds futures contracts imply a rate of 4.8% by the end of 2027. That level would represent four additional quarter-point increases from the current 3.75%-4% range, a materially steeper path than the Fed has laid out in its own public commentary to date.

Williams Calls Another Hike Before Year-End ‘Reasonable’

New York Fed President John Williams added to the hawkish tone earlier Thursday. He said it is “reasonable” to expect another rate hike before the end of the year.

Neither Paulson nor Williams specified whether their preferred timing lines up with the October meeting that markets are currently favoring at 64% odds, or with the January move traders also expect. Their comments and the CNBC report do not include a response from FOMC members who have publicly favored a slower pace, leaving that side of the debate unaddressed in this reporting.

The BlockWest read. A funds rate path toward 4.8% by 2027 raises the discount rate applied to every long-duration asset, digital or otherwise, and tightens the funding backdrop for leveraged crypto positions and treasury-heavy balance sheets alike. Firms holding Bitcoin or other reserve assets on corporate books should be modeling carrying costs against a higher-for-longer rate regime, not the pause many had priced in earlier this year.

The next data point arrives at the FOMC’s October meeting, where futures markets currently assign a 64% probability to another quarter-point hike, with a subsequent move already expected by traders in January.

Christopher Phelan argues Fed rate hike would be mistake given lower inflation

Christopher Phelan argues Fed rate hike would be mistake given lower inflation

, , , , ,

White House economic adviser Christopher Phelan has directly challenged the Federal Reserve ahead of today’s rate decision, arguing that inflation data no longer supports tightening monetary policy. The statement adds political pressure to an already divided FOMC and signals potential conflict between the Trump administration and Fed Chair Kevin Warsh over the direction of interest rates.

  • Christopher Phelan, CEA chairman, told CNBC that a Fed rate hike would be a mistake given recent inflation trends.
  • Phelan cited lower inflation across major gauges including CPI and PCE over the past three months as justification.
  • The FOMC is expected to be closely divided, with markets pricing in rising odds of a hike today.
  • 9-3 Vote margin holding rates steady at July FOMC meeting, signaling committee splits
  • Today Federal Reserve announces rate decision following week-long FOMC committee meeting

According to reporting by BeInCrypto, Christopher Phelan, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, warned on CNBC’s Closing Bell Overtime that the Federal Reserve should not raise rates at today’s announcement. The Federal Open Market Committee, the Fed’s rate-setting body, concludes its meeting this week. Phelan argued that declining inflation across all major measures contradicts the case for tightening, while noting the Fed had declined to hike rates months earlier when price pressures were more acute.

Phelan Cites Falling Inflation Across All Major Measures

Phelan pointed to inflation trends across the Consumer Price Index and Personal Consumption Expenditures index to support his position against a rate increase. He stressed the logical inconsistency of holding rates steady when inflation ran hotter while considering a hike now that price growth has cooled. His argument directly contradicts Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s earlier signals that the central bank still has work to do on inflation.

No matter how you measure it, inflation is coming down. They didn’t choose to raise rates 3 months ago when inflation was higher. It doesn’t make sense to raise rates now in my view.

Christopher Phelan, Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, on CNBC

Political Pressure Aligns With Trump Administration’s Rate Preferences

Phelan’s public pushback reflects President Donald Trump’s stated preference for lower interest rates rather than hikes. A rate increase would reverse the direction of monetary policy the administration has publicly favored, creating friction between the White House and the central bank at a sensitive moment. Fed watchers expect the committee to remain internally divided on the decision.

Market Impact Hinges on Warsh’s Vote and Forward Guidance

Bitcoin and broader risk assets face headwinds if the Fed raises rates, as traders have priced higher borrowing costs as a drag on non-yielding assets relative to bonds. The July FOMC meeting produced a nine-to-three vote to hold rates steady, demonstrating the committee’s split opinion. Fed Chair Warsh’s position on inflation and his remarks during today’s press conference will determine whether the committee votes to hike or hold, directly influencing borrowing costs and risk appetite in the sessions ahead.

The BlockWest read. Phelan’s intervention signals deepening friction between fiscal and monetary authorities over inflation’s trajectory. Markets read this as administration confidence that price pressures have cooled enough to justify holding or even cutting rates, a view the Fed’s own leadership has not yet endorsed. How Warsh frames inflation risk today will determine whether the White House gets the policy outcome it seeks.

Traders should watch Warsh’s press conference immediately following the rate announcement for clarity on the committee’s inflation assessment and any signals regarding the vote count. A hike would validate the hawkish faction despite Phelan’s public opposition, while a hold would suggest Warsh’s view has shifted toward the administration’s position.

Bitcoin Mining’s Energy Demands Threaten Oil Markets Through 2027, IEA Revises Forecasts Downward

Bitcoin Mining’s Energy Demands Threaten Oil Markets Through 2027, IEA Revises Forecasts Downward

, , , , , , ,

The International Energy Agency’s delayed timeline for Gulf oil supply recovery now extends into 2027, potentially prolonging elevated energy costs and inflation expectations that could defer the interest rate cuts Bitcoin borrowers need for cheaper financing. Energy price persistence directly affects inflation expectations and Fed policy, making the oil outlook a key variable for leveraged Bitcoin positions.

  • IEA cut 2026 global oil supply forecast to 100.7 million barrels daily, down 1.3 million from August projection.
  • Global oil consumption expected to fall 2.5 million barrels daily in 2026 versus 2025, yet inventories fell 95 million barrels in August.
  • Full Gulf supply recovery now forecast for 2027, delaying energy-driven inflation relief that could ease borrowing costs for leveraged investors.
  • 100.7M IEA’s 2026 global oil supply forecast in barrels per day
  • 1.3M Downward revision in barrels per day from August outlook
  • 4.6% University of Michigan year-ahead inflation expectation, up from 4.0% in August
  • 2027 Year IEA now expects full Gulf supply recovery

IEA Extends Supply Normalization Timeline

The International Energy Agency released a Sept. 11 report that materially extended the timeline for oil market normalization, revising its 2026 supply forecast down to 100.7 million barrels a day from 102 million barrels projected in August. The downward adjustment of 1.3 million barrels daily reflects persistent Middle East supply constraints stemming from regional geopolitical tensions and infrastructure challenges that have proven more resilient than initially expected.

The revised outlook signals that energy-driven inflation pressures could linger well into 2026, complicating the Federal Reserve’s path toward rate cuts that would reduce borrowing costs for leveraged Bitcoin investors and other market participants carrying debt. This represents a material shift in the energy supply narrative that underpins broader economic forecasting and monetary policy expectations.

The IEA’s extended recovery timeline reflects mounting evidence that supply disruptions in the Persian Gulf region have deeper structural components than temporary production outages. Beyond immediate production losses, the agency identified ongoing challenges in refined product exports, liquefied petroleum gas shipments, and crude routing decisions that collectively point to a more complicated recovery path than earlier projections assumed.

Weakening Demand Fails To Ease Physical Supply Tightness

While the IEA forecasts global oil consumption will contract by 2.5 million barrels a day in 2026 compared with 2025, that decline alone has not resolved underlying scarcity conditions. Global observed inventories fell by 95 million barrels in August, indicating that reduced demand has not eased the physical tightness in crude markets. The agency noted that increased volumes bypassing the Strait of Hormuz and military-escorted shipments through the waterway narrowed crude export losses in August.

This disconnect between falling demand and persistent inventory draws underscores a critical distinction in oil market dynamics: supply constraints can overwhelm demand destruction when physical availability limitations prevent normal market clearing. The pattern suggests that Gulf production remains sufficiently constrained that even weaker global consumption cannot bring inventories back to comfortable levels.

However, Gulf refined-product and liquefied petroleum gas exports remained nearly 60% below February levels as of August, underscoring uneven recovery across energy product categories. This sectoral fragmentation complicates inflation assessments, as refined products and LPG carry significant weight in transportation and heating costs that directly affect consumer price indices.

Inflation Expectations Rise Ahead Of Fed Decision

The University of Michigan’s preliminary September survey showed year-ahead inflation expectations rising to 4.6% from 4.0% in August, a signal that energy cost concerns are beginning to affect consumer price outlook. Long-run inflation expectations moved to 3.4% from 3.3%, a smaller shift that warrants monitoring but does not yet constitute a sustained change in expectations. The divergence between short-term and longer-term expectations reflects near-term energy concerns without yet cascading into permanent inflation psychology.

Fed Governor Christopher Waller acknowledged the risk in a Sept. 3 speech, noting that renewed energy pressure and rising longer-term expectations posed downside risks to disinflation. Waller stated he could support holding rates if disinflation continued, but would consider a rate increase if August inflation progress reversed. Those comments preceded the IEA’s latest downward revision, meaning the energy outlook may shift his assessment heading into the Sept. 15-16 Fed meeting.

The interplay between energy supply recovery timelines and Federal Reserve decision-making creates a feedback loop that directly impacts asset prices and borrowing costs across financial markets. When energy supply becomes more constrained, inflation expectations rise, the Fed becomes more hawkish on rates, and leveraged positions become more expensive to finance.

For Bitcoin borrowers relying on lower interest rates to reduce financing costs, the relevant connection runs through inflation expectations and Fed policy response to persistent energy pressure. A delayed Gulf supply recovery extends the window during which energy serves as an inflation headwind rather than a deflationary factor.

Critical Test Ahead For Fed Policy Direction

The critical test at the Sept. 15-16 Federal Reserve meeting will be whether weakening consumption and recovering export flows translate into moderating inflation pressure, or whether sustained energy price pressure forces the Fed to hold or raise rates longer than markets currently expect. Sustained supply recovery with limited spillovers into broader goods and services prices would strengthen the case for rate cuts; persistent energy price pressure would weaken it. Falling oil demand alone provides no assurance of financing relief for leveraged Bitcoin positions without corresponding supply normalization. The IEA’s revised timeline suggests markets should prepare for an extended period of elevated energy price risk that could anchor inflation expectations higher than previously anticipated.

Bitcoin maintains its advance while traders assess September rate increase probability at 85%

Bitcoin maintains its advance while traders assess September rate increase probability at 85%

, , , , , , ,

The Federal Reserve faces conflicting inflation signals that have raised September rate hike odds to 85%, even as Bitcoin initially held modest gains following the August CPI report. For digital asset traders, the outcome hinges on whether energy price pressures spread into core inflation and shift Fed expectations away from the rate cuts priced into recent rallies.

  • August core CPI rose 0.3% monthly after 0.2% in July, even as annual core inflation eased to 2.4% from 2.5%.
  • Fed futures moved to 85% probability of a quarter-point rate increase at the September 15-16 meeting, up from 70% before the report.
  • Bitcoin held near $78,683, up 2.08% over 24 hours as of US market close, but the report’s energy component and September oil price moves remain unpriced.
  • 85% Probability of a 25-basis-point Fed rate hike in September, versus 70% before the inflation release
  • 0.3% August monthly core CPI increase, accelerating from 0.2% in July despite annual easing
  • 3.9% August gasoline index rise, accounting for over one-third of the monthly headline increase
  • 2.4% Annual core inflation rate, down from 2.5% but still above the Fed’s 2% target

The August consumer price index delivered a split verdict that kept financial markets on edge. Headline CPI rose 0.4% on a seasonally adjusted basis after a 0.1% increase in July, with the unadjusted 12-month rate holding steady at 3.4%. Gasoline drove much of the monthly move, its index climbing 3.9% and representing more than one-third of the all-items increase, while the broader energy index gained 2.1%. That composition initially offered some relief to Bitcoin traders and rate-cut advocates: a spike concentrated in volatile energy need not signal the same policy urgency as broad-based inflation. Yet the report contained pressures extending well beyond fuel prices.

The inflation data arrives at a critical juncture for monetary policy. The Federal Reserve has held its benchmark interest rate in the 5.25-5.50% range since July 2023, and market participants have increasingly priced in the possibility of rate cuts beginning in late 2024. However, the stickiness of core inflation has prompted debate among policymakers about whether the Fed has truly tamed price pressures or merely paused at an insufficient level. Digital asset markets have traded heavily on rate expectations, as lower interest rates typically reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets like Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Monthly Core Inflation Accelerates Despite Annual Easing

Core CPI, which excludes food and energy, rose 0.3% in August following a 0.2% increase in July. Simultaneously, the annual core inflation rate eased to 2.4% from 2.5%, creating a fundamental tension. The longer-run trajectory improved toward the Federal Reserve’s 2% goal, but the latest monthly pace moved in the opposite direction, signaling renewed underlying inflation pressure that extends beyond energy volatility.

This divergence between monthly and annual metrics illustrates a key challenge facing the Fed. When monthly core inflation accelerates after appearing to stabilize, it raises questions about whether the disinflation process has stabilized or merely paused. Fed policymakers typically examine both time horizons, as monthly figures can be volatile while annual rates capture broader trends, but consistent acceleration in the monthly data warrants serious attention.

Other price components reinforced that mixed signal. Shelter rose 0.3% in August, while services excluding energy services gained 3.0% over the 12-month period. Services inflation remains particularly stubborn and difficult to forecast because it reflects labor market dynamics, wage pressures, and structural demand patterns that cannot easily reverse through commodity price declines. Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller had previously framed his September decision around August inflation data, stating in a September 3 speech that continued progress toward the 2% target would incline him to support holding rates steady, but that a hot report or evidence of reversed progress could lead him to consider a hike at the September 15-16 meeting.

Continued progress toward the Fed’s 2% goal would incline him to support holding the policy rate steady. He also said a hot report, or evidence that progress had reversed, could lead him to consider a hike at the September 15-16 meeting.

Christopher Waller, Federal Reserve Governor

Traders Weight Monthly Risk Over Annual Improvement

Market reaction showed that futures traders gave substantial weight to the monthly core acceleration risk rather than the annual core improvement.

CME FedWatch probabilities, derived from 30-Day Fed Funds futures, moved to an 85% probability of a quarter-point increase in September, up from approximately 70% before the inflation report. Waller described his policy view as a reaction function rather than a commitment, and his comments do not predetermine committee votes. However, they illustrate why the monthly core acceleration cannot be dismissed simply because annual core inflation edged closer to target. Waller noted that core inflation remains useful for seeing through energy volatility and that broader spillovers from earlier energy increases have not appeared so far, yet he identified renewed energy pressure and a possible rise in longer-term inflation expectations as risks warranting Fed attention.

The market’s repricing toward higher rate hike odds reflects rational uncertainty about whether the Fed should remain patient or take defensive action. A quarter-point increase at this stage would represent a hold rather than a true tightening, but it would signal that the Fed retains options if inflation proves more persistent than recent trends suggest. For Bitcoin and other risk assets, such a signal could dampen near-term momentum that has built on expectations of imminent rate cuts.

September Energy Shocks Still Unpriced in Inflation Data

Bitcoin initially held its daily gain near $78,683, up 2.08% over 24 hours as of US market close, yet the August CPI release carries a critical timing constraint. The August report cannot capture the sharper oil price movements that developed in September, creating a gap between the data released and current market conditions. The new energy shock remains outside the August CPI figures and cannot yet be assessed as evidence of broader inflation spread.

Whether September’s energy pressure persists or bleeds into broader price categories remains a separate risk for subsequent inflation data and inflation expectations channels that Waller identified as policy concerns. Oil prices can fluctuate sharply based on supply disruptions, geopolitical events, and demand shocks that may prove temporary. However, if energy costs remain elevated for several consecutive months, they can eventually feed into broader price pressures through transportation costs, manufacturing expenses, and consumer demand patterns.

The August report gave policymakers reason to look through part of the gasoline-led jump, but faster monthly core inflation complicated the case for holding rates. Bitcoin traders must now monitor whether the September oil price shock appears in upcoming inflation expectations measures or broader price data that could shift Fed decision-making away from the rate-cut scenario currently embedded in digital asset valuations.

The tension between monthly and annual inflation metrics, combined with persistent services inflation and energy volatility, creates genuine uncertainty about the Fed’s September decision. For digital asset markets, clarity may not arrive until later inflation reports and forward guidance provide stronger signals about the Fed’s confidence in the disinflationary trend. The next few weeks of economic data and Fed communications will prove critical for determining whether September marks a pause in rate cuts or a signal of persistent policy tightness ahead.

Federal Reserve Likely to Raise Interest Rates as Trump’s Economic Policies Face Scrutiny

Federal Reserve Likely to Raise Interest Rates as Trump’s Economic Policies Face Scrutiny

, , , , ,

Fed Chair Kevin Warsh faces a critical rate decision Wednesday amid mounting inflation data that contradicts Trump’s campaign for lower borrowing costs. The outcome will test whether Trump’s preferred Fed leader will diverge from the rate-cut agenda that secured his appointment.

  • Traders assign 86.9% probability to a Fed rate hike at next week’s meeting, defying Trump’s explicit pre-condition for cheaper money.
  • Core inflation rose 0.3% in August versus economist expectations of 0.2%, providing ammunition for officials arguing rate increases are necessary.
  • Warsh has held rates steady through two meetings since his May 22 swearing-in, after Powell cut three times in late 2025 before departing.
  • 86.9% Probability of Fed rate hike next meeting according to CME FedWatch Tool
  • 0.3% Monthly core inflation reading in August versus 0.2% consensus forecast
  • 4.1% August unemployment rate, unchanged from prior month with rising participation
  • 162,000 Jobs added in August, tepid labor market growth amid inflation concerns

President Trump spent months attacking Jerome Powell as a bottleneck to monetary easing, ultimately securing the departure of the previous Fed Chair and engineering the appointment of Kevin Warsh as his replacement. The strategy hinged on a straightforward premise: a Trump-friendly Fed leader would cut rates aggressively to stimulate the economy before the 2026 midterms. Powell did deliver three rate cuts in the final months of 2025, finishing on December 10. Warsh, who took office on May 22 after a spring campaign in which Trump called Powell tardy and overly cautious, has held rates steady through his first two meetings in June and July. The latest inflation data now threatens to demolish Trump’s rate-cut narrative entirely.

The political stakes reflect a fundamental tension in Federal Reserve governance. Presidents cannot legally direct monetary policy, yet the appointment power provides significant influence over long-term policy direction. Trump’s explicit linkage of Warsh’s nomination to an expectation of rate cuts represented an unusually transparent version of this dynamic. By publicly stating that lower rates were a condition for Warsh’s confirmation, Trump created a accountability mechanism that would make any rate increase appear to violate an implicit campaign promise.

CME FedWatch Tool Shows 86.9% Probability of Rate Increase

Market pricing on Friday placed near-certain odds on a Fed rate hike at the September meeting, contradicting the entire premise of Trump’s Fed Chair selection strategy. Analysts at the Kobeissi Letter framed the paradox bluntly: Trump had made rate cuts a precondition for his Fed Chair appointment, yet Warsh now faces mounting pressure to raise rates at his first major policy decision since assuming office.

The tension reflects a deeper bind for Warsh. No FOMC chair has cast a dissenting vote since 1939, meaning any rate move carries the weight of consensus backing. With three officials voting to raise rates at the July meeting, and inflation data now disappointing on the upside, the political calculus has shifted sharply against the low-rate environment Trump promised during his campaign. Warsh’s colleagues have signaled discomfort with the current rate level relative to inflation trends, creating institutional pressure that transcends Trump’s political preferences.

The broader economic backdrop adds complexity to Warsh’s decision. Financial conditions have tightened considerably since Powell’s final rate cut in December, with credit spreads widening and equity volatility rising in recent weeks. Some economists argue that the Fed’s effective tightening through market dynamics may already be restraining growth without an official rate increase. This technical debate provides intellectual cover for either a rate hold or a hike, depending on how policymakers weight forward-looking risks.

Core Inflation Beats Expectations Higher, Triggering Hike Fears

Friday’s consumer price report delivered the data point Warsh apparently hoped to avoid. Core inflation, which strips out volatile food and fuel, climbed 0.3% in August when economists had forecast 0.2%. Gasoline prices spiked 3.9% in a single month, adding to headline inflation pressures that extend beyond the Fed’s direct control. Fed Governor Christopher Waller had previously signaled that a hot core inflation reading would place a rate increase on his agenda, and Friday’s miss in the dovish direction supplied exactly that trigger.

The inflation surprise carries particular significance because core price growth had been moderating in recent months. A reacceleration in the core rate suggests that the disinflationary trend Powell relied upon may be reversing. UBS now expects two rate increases this year, a significant revision upward from prior guidance. Heather Long, chief economist at Navy Federal Credit Union, argued that Warsh may fear repeating Powell’s error of waiting too long to tighten policy. A rate hike could cool price pressures and ultimately benefit lower-income Americans by reducing inflation, she contended.

Other voices, including Daniel Lacalle, chief economist at Tressis, countered that hiking into a labor market still posting only 162,000 jobs in August and 4.1% unemployment would violate the Fed’s dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment. This disagreement reflects genuine uncertainty about whether current inflation reflects persistent demand pressures or temporary supply-side factors that will fade without policy tightening.

Kevin Hassett, who leads the National Economic Council, offers the White House counterargument by pointing to a three-month core inflation rate of 1.6%, a shorter window that paints a less alarming picture than the standard Federal Reserve methodology.

Warsh’s Wednesday Vote Tests Trump’s Real Influence Over Monetary Policy

Warsh casts his first major rate-setting vote on Wednesday, and the outcome will definitively answer whether Trump’s appointment of a sympathetic Fed Chair translates into actual policy shifts. The President explicitly made rate cuts a condition of Warsh’s hiring, yet market expectations now suggest his first move may go in the opposite direction. Trump has repeatedly stated his preference for rates near 1%, a target that assumes sustained monetary easing regardless of inflation trends.

Warsh sent carefully prepared remarks at Jackson Hole laying out his intentions, including hawkish language about inflation. If he does vote to raise rates, it would suggest that the inflation reality supersedes political pressure. If he holds steady or cuts despite Friday’s data, it would vindicate Trump’s bet that personnel changes at the Fed matter more than economic conditions. The labor market data complicates either narrative: 162,000 jobs and rising participation suggest enough economic momentum to absorb a hike, yet still fall short of the robust expansion that would clearly justify tightening.

Historical precedent provides limited guidance for this scenario. Fed Chairs typically resist overt political pressure while remaining sensitive to broader policy coordination. Warsh’s background in financial markets and prior Fed service gives him credibility with both the administration and the broader central banking community, potentially allowing him to navigate this minefield more gracefully than his predecessor.

Bitcoin and gold both declined on the Friday CPI reaction but recovered almost immediately, suggesting crypto markets are pricing in rate uncertainty rather than conviction. Warsh’s decision on Wednesday will establish whether Trump’s preferred Fed Chair becomes the rate-cutting instrument he appointed, or whether inflation dynamics override political calculations. The answer carries consequences well beyond asset prices: it will determine whether the White House can engineer the 1% federal funds rate Trump has publicly targeted and whether future presidents can realistically expect their Fed appointees to prioritize electoral cycles over price stability.

Inflation Data Rises, Dampening Expectations for Lower Interest Rates and Presenting Bitcoin Investors with a Costly Choice

Inflation Data Rises, Dampening Expectations for Lower Interest Rates and Presenting Bitcoin Investors with a Costly Choice

, , , , , , ,

Stronger-than-expected inflation readings across consumer and producer prices in August have dimmed expectations for near-term interest rate cuts, extending the period of elevated borrowing costs that pressures leveraged Bitcoin positions. The data shift could keep Treasury yields elevated and reward investors holding cash over those financing crypto positions through debt.

  • Consumer prices rose 0.4% in August, double the 0.1% July increase, while annual CPI held at 3.4%
  • Core CPI excluding food and energy accelerated to 0.3% monthly from 0.2%, even as the annual core rate eased to 2.4%
  • Producer prices climbed 0.4% monthly and 5.4% annually, with energy driving over three-quarters of the final-demand goods increase
  • 0.4% August monthly CPI increase versus 0.1% rise in July
  • 0.3% Core CPI monthly gain, up from 0.2% the prior month
  • 5.4% Annual PPI growth, a significant acceleration from the monthly 0.4% reading
  • 3.9% August gasoline price increase, accounting for over one-third of CPI gains

The August inflation data released Friday strengthens the Federal Reserve’s case for maintaining restrictive monetary policy ahead of its September 15-16 meeting. While annual core CPI eased to 2.4% from 2.5%, the monthly acceleration in both headline and core measures signals that disinflationary momentum may be stalling. Energy prices accounted for much of the headline surge, but the pickup in core CPI outside food and fuel indicates that price pressures are broadening across the economy beyond temporary commodity swings.

Market expectations for rate cuts have shifted notably in response to this data. Futures markets that previously priced in multiple cuts through year-end have now adjusted to reflect a more patient Fed stance, with some projecting rates could remain elevated well into 2024. The shift reflects a fundamental reassessment of inflation’s trajectory and the persistence of price pressures that monetary tightening has failed to fully extinguish.

Core Inflation Accelerates Despite Cooling Annual Rate

The monthly core CPI reading presents a particular challenge for rate-cut advocates.

Core prices rose 0.3% in August compared with 0.2% in July, countering the narrative that inflation is steadily easing toward the Fed’s 2% target. While the annual core rate of 2.4% appears closer to that objective than prior months, the acceleration at the monthly level reflects recent pricing behavior more directly. Analysts had expected a 0.2% monthly increase before Friday’s report; the 0.3% reading suggests underlying consumer inflation remains sticky despite the Fed’s restrictive stance since 2022.

This pattern of slowing annual rates paired with accelerating monthly readings has become increasingly common in recent months, frustrating policymakers who need to distinguish between trend and noise. The divergence typically reflects base effects from elevated readings a year prior, as higher prices from earlier in 2022 cycle out of annual calculations. However, when monthly momentum reverses upward, it raises questions about whether the underlying inflation rate has truly cooled or merely benefited from temporary factors.

Producer price data reinforces this picture. The PPI excluding food, energy, and trade services slowed to 0.3% monthly from 0.4%, offering some reassurance that wholesale cost pressures may be moderating. However, services prices rose only 0.1%, a weak contribution that still leaves the broader monthly PPI up 0.4% and the annual PPI up 5.4% compared with a year earlier. Services inflation matters particularly because it tends to reflect wage pressures and labor-intensive activities that monetary policy influences most directly.

Energy Concentration Masks Persistent Cost Pressures

Energy’s dominant role in August’s inflation reports creates an interpretive dilemma for policymakers. Gasoline prices surged 3.9%, accounting for more than one-third of the monthly CPI increase, while energy prices in the producer report rose 4.2% and comprised over three-quarters of the final-demand goods acceleration. This concentration theoretically gives the Fed cover to look past headline numbers, since fuel price movements reflect supply dynamics largely outside monetary policy’s reach.

But sustained energy costs can embed themselves into broader inflation through transport and manufacturing expenses.

Delivery companies facing higher fuel bills may raise customer charges, while manufacturers may pass elevated logistics costs into their selling prices. This secondary transmission mechanism has historically extended the inflationary impact of commodity shocks well beyond the initial energy price spike. The degree to which these cost increases reach consumers hinges on contract terms, competitive pressures, and corporate pricing power in various sectors. Airlines, trucking firms, and chemical manufacturers all face different constraints on passing fuel costs forward.

The challenge for officials is distinguishing between temporary energy shocks and the beginning of a secondary round of price increases that could delay disinflation and necessitate persistently higher rates. Historical precedent shows that commodity-driven inflation waves often prove more persistent than initially expected, as businesses initially absorb costs and later adjust pricing when competitive conditions allow.

Higher Rates Extend the Window of Expensive Borrowing for Bitcoin Investors

For Bitcoin market participants, Friday’s inflation data extends the timeline for elevated financing costs. Investors holding cash can continue earning interest on government securities, making the opportunity cost of holding Bitcoin more explicit when Treasury yields remain elevated. Those borrowing to accumulate or maintain crypto positions face direct drag from interest payments, which reduce potential gains from Bitcoin price appreciation or amplify losses.

This dynamic has significant implications for leveraged trading activity in digital asset markets. When borrowing costs exceed expected returns or when risk-free rates become highly competitive, rational investors shift capital away from speculative positions toward safer alternatives. Margin call risks also increase when positions remain financed at elevated rates over extended periods, potentially forcing liquidations if Bitcoin prices weaken.

Expectations alone move market conditions even before the Fed acts. Inflation releases shape bond yields and lender willingness to extend credit, altering investment calculations immediately rather than waiting for official policy moves. Bitcoin’s long-term narrative as a hedge against currency debasement can coexist with short-term sensitivity to real interest rates and the returns available from alternative assets. The Fed’s September meeting will bring new employment data and guidance that could clarify the central bank’s timing for rate adjustments, directly impacting how investors weigh the carrying costs of leveraged Bitcoin strategies against passive Treasury holdings.

Officials will weigh Friday’s inflation data alongside employment figures and their own assessment of how long current price increases will persist when they convene September 15-16. If energy prices stabilize or decline, policymakers may view the core acceleration as temporary noise and eventually ease policy. Conversely, if core inflation remains elevated or secondary cost pressures begin appearing in transport and manufacturing margins, the Fed could maintain restrictive conditions longer, keeping Treasury yields high and leverage expensive for Bitcoin investors.

Bitcoin approaches key $76,000 support level as macroeconomic volatility increases

Bitcoin approaches key $76,000 support level as macroeconomic volatility increases

, , , , , , ,

Bitcoin has fallen into a crucial support zone as macro headwinds intensify, with oil surging above $100 a barrel and Treasury yields climbing toward 5 percent on renewed inflation concerns. Crypto derivatives are unwinding as traders reprice rate expectations ahead of Friday’s consumer-price report, which could determine whether Bitcoin holds or breaks through key accumulation levels.

  • Bitcoin fell to $76,676.07 intraday on Sept. 10 as the 10-year Treasury yield climbed to 4.93 percent, its highest in weeks amid oil and inflation pressures.
  • More than 161,900 traders were liquidated over 24 hours with $568 million in total forced closures, including $138 million in Bitcoin long positions.
  • Glassnode data show significant buyer accumulation between $76,000 and $82,000, with deeper support clustered around $62,000 to $65,000 if current levels break.
  • $76,676 Bitcoin intraday low on Sept. 10 as macro selloff accelerated
  • 4.93% 10-year Treasury yield, climbing toward the 5 percent threshold
  • $568M Total crypto liquidations in 24 hours through Sept. 10
  • 76% Market pricing for quarter-point Fed rate increase at Sept. 15-16 meeting

Bitcoin tested a critical support cluster on Sept. 10 as global financial markets repriced around inflation data and surging oil prices, threatening to undo weeks of recovery gains. West Texas Intermediate crude rose more than 4 percent to above $100 a barrel for the first time since May, while Brent crude climbed past $105 following escalating attacks on Middle East shipping routes. The energy advance has outpaced official inflation reports, creating a gap between current price data and the actual cost pressures now building through commodity and energy markets.

Oil’s Energy Shock Outpaces Inflation Data Collection

The August producer-price data released during this period ended collection on Aug. 11, before crude’s latest surge above $100. U.S. producer prices rose 0.4 percent in August and 5.4 percent annually, up from 4.8 percent in July. Core PPI increased only 0.2 percent month-over-month, falling short of the 0.3 percent forecast, yet the softer reading did little to calm bond markets as traders looked ahead to future inflation impacts.

Joseph Brusuelas, principal and chief economist at RSM US LLP, said current diesel prices translate to crude trading near $207 a barrel and warned that higher energy costs will likely feed through wholesale prices and core inflation during September. The European Central Bank raised its deposit rate by 25 basis points to 2.5 percent on Sept. 10, its second increase this year, after euro-area inflation moved above 3 percent. This global central bank tightening reinforces expectations for additional U.S. rate increases.

The lag between energy price movements and their appearance in official inflation data creates uncertainty for traders positioning ahead of reports. Oil prices typically feed into consumer prices with a delay measured in weeks to months, meaning the full impact of crude’s move above $100 may not show up until subsequent monthly inflation readings.

The combination of inflation and energy prices strengthens the case for a Fed increase at its Sept. 15-16 meeting, with Friday’s consumer-price report likely to shape the final decision.

Joseph Brusuelas, RSM US LLP

Treasury Yields Push Toward 5 Percent as Auctions Loom

The 10-year Treasury yield moved toward the 5 percent level even after the Treasury expanded its liquidity operation for long-dated debt. The 30-year yield reached 5.35 percent, its highest level in 19 years, ahead of a new auction on Sept. 10. Brusuelas said the combination of inflation data, oil prices and global central-bank action has placed a near-term test of 5 percent on the 10-year yield in the immediate offing, with a hotter-than-expected CPI report potentially sending it well beyond that threshold.

The Treasury tripled the size of its next long-end buyback to as much as $6 billion.

The two-year Treasury yield climbed to about 4.50 percent, nearly a full percentage point above the Fed’s current 3.50-3.75 percent target range as traders repositioned for further rate increases. That repricing immediately spilled into crypto derivatives markets, triggering forced liquidations across Bitcoin and Ethereum positions as leverage unwound. The steepening yield curve reflects market expectations for multiple additional rate increases beyond the September meeting.

Crypto Liquidations Mount as Leverage Unwinds Rapidly

More than 161,900 traders faced liquidation over the 24 hours surrounding Sept. 10, with total forced position closures reaching approximately $568 million according to CoinGlass data. Bitcoin longs accounted for roughly $138 million of that total, while Ethereum long positions suffered another $113 million in losses. These cascading liquidations reflect how tightly leveraged positions in cryptocurrency derivatives respond to macro repricing in traditional financial markets.

Bitcoin taker sell volume on Binance surged above $1.4 billion within one hour as derivatives traders cut exposure or positioned for further declines.

CryptoQuant data showed selling intensifying around macro releases, with more than $60 million of Bitcoin positions liquidated during the same window as prices fell toward $77,000. The selloff pushed Bitcoin back into price zones where recent buyers had been accumulating coins, with Glassnode data showing supply building between roughly $76,000 and $82,000. A much heavier long-term-holder accumulation block sits between $83,000 and $86,000, where approximately 1.07 million BTC were acquired at those levels.

If Bitcoin breaks below the current $76,000 to $82,000 support cluster, Glassnode identifies deeper accumulation support around $62,000 to $65,000. A sustained move below that zone would expose substantially lower cost-basis support if the macro selloff persists and rate expectations continue climbing. The depth of support at various price levels reflects historical accumulation patterns by long-term investors who view dips as buying opportunities.

Friday’s consumer-price report will test this support directly, with economists expecting headline inflation to rise 0.2 percent month-over-month in August and core prices to increase 0.2 percent. A stronger reading could push the 10-year yield through 5 percent and reinforce Fed rate-hike expectations, adding downward pressure to Bitcoin while buyers attempt to defend the $76,000 to $82,000 range. However, even the CPI report will capture only a partial picture of oil’s move above $100, leaving traders to decide how much of September’s energy shock to price in before subsequent inflation data arrives with more complete readings. This disconnect between current energy prices and historical inflation data creates additional volatility as markets adjust expectations across multiple time horizons.

The US Dollar Remains Stalled as Americans Face Potential Economic Hardship Ahead

The US Dollar Remains Stalled as Americans Face Potential Economic Hardship Ahead

, , , , ,

The US dollar’s month-long stagnation masks deepening tension between hawkish Fed policy and rising global yields, creating uncertainty for import costs, asset prices, and capital flows. Investors face conflicting signals on whether the dollar will break higher or resume its longer-term decline, with key inflation and central bank decisions imminent.

  • 99 Dollar Index level, unchanged after one month of sideways movement
  • 70% Futures odds of Fed hike versus economist consensus for no change
  • $1.8T US fiscal deficit through first ten months of fiscal 2026
  • 155 USD-JPY rate after strengthening from 164 in July via intervention

The US dollar has stalled at the Dollar Index near 99 for roughly a month, masking a fundamental dispute about the currency’s trajectory and America’s relative economic position. On the surface, conditions favor a stronger dollar. The Federal Reserve maintains rates at 3.50% to 3.75%, August producer inflation stood at 5.4% year-on-year, the US labor market added 162,000 jobs last month, and Brent crude has recovered above $100 per barrel, all of which could justify continued Fed tightness. Yet that hawkish backdrop faces headwinds from abroad and mounting fiscal concerns that are keeping the dollar pinned.

Global Rate Rises Narrow The Fed’s Yield Edge

Other central banks are tightening in parallel, stripping away the dollar’s traditional advantage. The European Central Bank raised its deposit rate to 2.50% on Thursday, while the Bank of Japan is expected to lift rates to 1.25% next week, narrowing or closing the interest rate premium that typically attracts foreign capital to dollar assets. Currency intervention has also shifted the equation. US-Japan intervention has strengthened the yen from nearly 164 per dollar in July to around 155, reducing the carry trade incentive that had favored dollar borrowing.

When yields rise globally, the dollar’s appeal as a safe-haven asset diminishes significantly. In a synchronized tightening environment, investors have less reason to concentrate holdings in US Treasuries over comparable European or Japanese government bonds. This dynamic represents a structural shift from the post-pandemic period, when the Federal Reserve moved more aggressively than peers, creating a wide yield differential that supported dollar strength. As that gap narrows, historical relationships between interest rates and currency valuations suggest the dollar may struggle to sustain premium valuations.

The fiscal backdrop compounds the tension. Washington is running a roughly $1.8 trillion deficit through the first ten months of fiscal 2026, a structural imbalance that can weigh on long-term currency demand and investor willingness to absorb additional Treasury supply at current rates. Large deficits typically require higher yields to attract bidders, and sustained deficits can erode confidence in a currency’s purchasing power over time.

Technical Charts Split On Direction As Key Tests Loom

The weekly and daily charts offer conflicting signals about the dollar’s next move. The weekly picture remains neutral, with a close above 101.98 needed to restore bullish momentum and a break below 97.63 required to confirm a return to the longer-term downtrend. The daily chart presents a weaker setup. The Dollar Index broke its 2026 rising trendline in August, failed to reclaim it, and now faces resistance in the 100.00 to 100.60 band.

Neither technical posture resolves the fundamental standoff between dollar-positive forces, like Fed hawkishness and strong labor data, and dollar-negative pressures, like rising foreign yields and fiscal deficits. This gridlock explains why the currency has traded in such a narrow band, unable to commit to either direction. The stagnation also reflects broader market uncertainty about whether current US interest rates adequately compensate investors for the combination of inflation risk, fiscal sustainability concerns, and geopolitical instability.

Friday CPI Print And Fed Meeting Could Force Capitulation

Market participants face conflicting guidance on Fed intentions. Futures markets price approximately 70% odds of a rate hike next week, while a Reuters poll published Wednesday found about 70% of economists expecting no change. That disconnect suggests the market and the consensus are reading the data differently, and Friday’s US consumer price inflation report will be critical to resolving it.

Economists expect annual CPI of 3.4%, a level that could either support the case for continued Fed action or signal sufficient progress toward 2% that patience is warranted. The Fed meets September 15 to 16, followed immediately by the Bank of Japan on September 17 to 18, creating a concentrated window of central bank decisions that should finally break the dollar’s month-long stasis. This sequence matters for global markets, since any surprise shift in Fed or BOJ policy could ripple through commodity prices, emerging market currencies, and equity valuations.

Friday’s CPI report will land first and set the tone for whether the Fed enters its meeting under pressure to hike or is given room to hold steady, with the dollar’s direction hinging on which signal prevails. A hotter-than-expected print could trigger a sharp dollar rally and force the market repricing that has been deferred during this sideways period. Conversely, signs of cooling inflation may allow the Fed to pause, narrowing its advantages over rival central banks and opening the door to dollar weakness.

Load More

Back To Top
© BlockWest 2026
BlockWest Media LLC

Equities, AI, and blue-chip crypto, covered as one connected market.

Sections

Company

Legal

Follow

𝕏 ▶ in

© 2026 BlockWest. All rights reserved.