stablecoin payments

Visa’s new onchain lending initiative targets a structural financing gap in its stablecoin settlement business, where card programs must fund daily obligations before customer payments arrive. The program demonstrates how blockchain infrastructure can be embedded into traditional payment settlement while keeping underwriting authority and risk assessment with the network operator.

• Visa reported 160 stablecoin-linked card programs in fiscal Q2 2026, with payment volume nearly 200% higher than year-earlier levels.
• Stablecoin settlement reached a $20 billion annualized run rate, more than 15 times the pace from the prior year.
• Credit Coop facilities have financed $2.5 billion in cumulative settlement volume since 2023 with zero reported defaults to date.

• $2.5B Cumulative settlement volume financed through Credit Coop since 2023
• 160 Stablecoin-linked card programs on Visa network in fiscal Q2 2026
• $20B Annualized stablecoin settlement run rate versus $1.3B prior year
• 30% Claimed reduction in borrowing costs through increased lender participation

Visa announced its onchain lending initiative on September 8, pairing its payment settlement infrastructure with Credit Coop, an onchain credit protocol, to address a persistent timing mismatch in card processing. Every card transaction creates a funding gap: the card network must settle obligations to Visa on its schedule, while cardholder payments arrive on a different timeline. For young or fast-growing stablecoin card programs, this gap can create acute capital constraints. Credit Coop’s revolving stablecoin facilities bridge that gap by allowing programs to draw funds for settlement obligations, with repayment automatically prioritized through a programmable contract called Spigot that intercepts incoming cardholder proceeds.

Stablecoin Payment Volume Accelerates Settlement Financing Demand

The financing need has grown sharply alongside Visa’s stablecoin business. The company reported more than 160 stablecoin-linked card programs in its fiscal second quarter of 2026, with payment volume on those programs nearly 200% higher than a year earlier. Stablecoin settlement had also recently exceeded a $20 billion annualized run rate, more than 15 times the prior-year pace, according to Visa’s disclosure.

Each metric captures a different dimension of growth: program count measures network reach, the volume growth rate covers card-payment activity, and the settlement run rate annualizes a recent flow.

The expansion reflects broader momentum in stablecoin adoption for payments, particularly among fintech and blockchain-native card programs seeking to move value across borders and settle faster than traditional banking rails allow. As transaction volumes grew, many newer programs lacked sufficient access to bank credit or warehouse financing to fund the daily settlement obligations that card operations require. This financing bottleneck could constrain growth for promising programs without institutional banking relationships, making onchain credit facilities an increasingly important component of the stablecoin payment infrastructure.

Hybrid Credit Model Combines Onchain Execution With Permissioned Underwriting Data

The Credit Coop structure introduces a hybrid credit mechanism where execution becomes transparent and verifiable on the blockchain, while decisive commercial risk assessment remains controlled by Visa. When a participating program draws from its revolving facility, stablecoins move to Visa’s settlement address. As cardholders make payments, those proceeds flow through Spigot, which automatically services interest, replenishes the credit line and routes remaining cash to the borrower’s operating account. This design brings a conventional form of receivables finance onto blockchain infrastructure, with smart contracts handling draws, cash-flow control and repayment mechanics.

Visa characterizes the model as secured only by settlement receivables, a departure from typical DeFi lending structures where borrowers post more liquid collateral than the loan is worth. Here, the asset supporting the advance is the payment stream generated by cardholders. The blockchain records all draws and repayments with timestamps and token movement history, creating an auditable ledger of contract execution. Visa said Credit Coop had processed more than 3,000 borrow events and 9,000 repayment events across participating facilities as of the announcement date.

A second evidence layer sits within Visa’s own systems. Credit Coop receives each program’s authorized daily settlement files through a secure pipeline, then combines those records with the onchain transaction history for facility sizing, disbursement and repayment verification. Public blockchain data documents token movements, while Visa’s internal feed connects those movements to specific settlement obligations and the program’s operating performance, giving Visa an expanded role as both the network that creates the timing gap and the data provider that helps lenders assess credit quality. This dual-layer approach reflects how blockchain-native finance can complement rather than replace traditional financial infrastructure.

Rain Demonstrates Operating Scale But Limited Risk Transparency Remains

Rain, a payments company and Visa principal member, accounts for most disclosed activity in the Credit Coop program. Visa said Rain has used a Credit Coop revolving facility since August 2023 and financed approximately $2 billion of cumulative settlement volume through more than 2,000 borrow events and 7,000 repayments as of August 19, 2026. Three years of repeated draws and repayments demonstrate an operating system with meaningful real-world usage, but publicly available figures reveal little about the shape of underlying credit risk.

Starting facility sizes, current exposure, lender concentration and performance through a loss period remain outside Visa’s disclosure.

Visa also cited Karta as a case study showing the model’s potential as a bridge to conventional capital. Visa said the card company launched and scaled with Credit Coop financing before moving to a larger institutional facility. Karta’s June announcement confirmed a $15 million Series A and $125 million credit facility from Community Investment Management, though Karta’s own announcement did not mention Credit Coop. The sequence suggests one possible role for onchain credit: repeated settlement draws and repayments can help a smaller program build an operating history before it seeks conventional institutional capital, making the blockchain facility a stepping stone into private credit rather than a replacement for it.

Programmable Execution Cannot Eliminate Underlying Credit Loss Risk

Credit Coop’s secured-line documentation identifies multiple lenders and assigns them priority repayment through Spigot-controlled cash flows. The smart contract enforces the configured money route, providing technical certainty over execution. However, the protocol’s own technical materials identify multiple human and software dependencies around that promise. The protocol assigns important powers to an arbiter and a Spigot owner, and its edge-case documentation describes possible revenue-contract changes, diverted cash flows, malicious control and complications in post-default execution.

These are design risks with no indication they occurred in the Visa-linked facilities, but the facility-specific legal protections remain out of view. Public disclosures do not name every lender behind the Visa-linked programs or provide the complete waterfall governing losses. They leave unanswered whether borrowers contribute first-loss equity or reserves, whether guarantees or insurance apply, and how far a lender’s claim extends after controlled receivables run short. A programmable lockbox improves a lender’s control over incoming value, but it cannot create value when customers fail to pay or when a receivable is disputed.

For investors and participants in onchain credit markets, the Credit Coop initiative demonstrates credible product-market fit: it solves a recurring financing need created by card settlement timing and strengthens Visa’s position inside the market by combining network infrastructure, crucial underwriting data and the context that turns a token transfer into a credit signal. The open question is whether Visa will disclose additional facility-level data including borrower first-loss contributions, current principal outstanding, lender composition and loss history as the program scales beyond Rain and other early participants.